Background As one of the purposes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is to return athletes to their pre-injury activity level, it is critical to understand variables influencing return to sport. Associations between return to sport and variables representing knee impairment, function and psychological status have not been well studied in athletes following ACLR. Purpose The purpose of this review is to summarize the literature reporting on variables proposed to be associated with return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Study Design Systematic Review Methods Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were searched for articles published before November 2012. Articles included in this review met these criteria: 1) included patients with primary ACLR, 2) reported at least one knee impairment, function or psychological measure, 3) reported a return to sport measure and 4) analyzed the relationship between the measure and return to sport. Results Weak evidence existed in sixteen articles suggesting variables associated with return to sport included higher quadriceps strength, less effusion, less pain, greater tibial rotation, higher Marx Activity score, higher athletic confidence, higher pre-operative knee self-efficacy, lower kinesiophobia and higher pre-operative self-motivation. Conclusion Weak evidence supports an association between knee impairment, functional, and psychological variables and return to sport. Current return to sport guidelines should be updated to reflect all variables associated with return to sport. Utilizing evidence-based return to sport guidelines following ACLR may ensure athletes are physically and psychologically capable of sports participation, which may reduce re-injury rates and the need for subsequent surgery.

STUDY DESIGN Feasibility randomized clinical trial BACKGROUND Rehabilitation may be an appropriate treatment strategy for patients with chronic hip joint pain (CHJP), however the evidence related to the effectiveness of rehabilitation is limited. OBJECTIVES Assess feasibility of performing a randomized clinical trial to investigate the effectiveness of movement pattern training (MPT) to improve function in people with CHJP. METHODS Thirty-five patients with chronic CHJP were randomized into two groups, treatment (MPT) or wait-list control (Wait-list). The MPT program included six, one hour supervised sessions and incorporated: 1) task-specific training for basic functional tasks and symptom-provoking tasks; and 2) strengthening of hip musculature. The Wait-list group received no treatment. Primary outcomes for feasibility were patient retention and adherence. Secondary outcomes to assess treatment effects were patient-reported function (Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [HOOS]), lower extremity kinematics, and hip muscle strength. RESULTS Retention rates did not differ between MPT (89%) and Wait-list groups (94%, P = 1.0). Sixteen of the 18 patients (89%) in the MPT group attended at least 80% of the treatment sessions. For the home exercise program, 89% of patients reported performing their home program at least once per day. Secondary outcomes support the rationale for conduct of a superiority RCT. CONCLUSION Based on retention and adherence rates, a larger RCT appears feasible and warranted to assess treatment effects more precisely. Data from this feasibility study will inform our future clinical trial.

Study Design Ancillary analysis, time-controlled randomized clinical trial. Background Movement-pattern training (MPT) has been shown to improve function among patients with chronic hip joint pain (CHJP). Objective To determine the association among treatment outcomes and mechanical factors associated with CHJP. Methods Twenty-eight patients with CHJP, 18 to 40 years of age, participated in MPT, either immediately after assessment or after a wait-list period. Movement-pattern training included task-specific training to reduce hip adduction motion during functional tasks and hip muscle strengthening. Hip-specific function was assessed using the Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS) and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). Three-dimensional kinematic data were used to quantify hip adduction motion, dynamometry to quantify abductor strength, and magnetic resonance imaging to measure femoral head sphericity using the alpha angle. Paired t tests assessed change from pretreatment to posttreatment. Spearman correlations assessed associations. Results There was significant improvement in MHHS and HOOS scores (P≤.02), adduction motion (P = .045), and abductor strength (P = .01) from pretreatment to posttreatment. Reduction in hip adduction motion (r = -0.67, P<.01) and lower body mass index (r = -0.38, P = .049) correlated with MHHS improvement. Alpha angle and abductor strength change were not correlated with change in MHHS or HOOS scores. Conclusion After MPT, patients reported improvements in pain and function that were associated with their ability to reduce hip adduction motion during functional tasks. Level of Evidence Therapy, level 2b. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48(4):316-324. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7810.

IMPORTANCE Chronic low back pain (LBP) is the most prevalent chronic pain in adults, and there is no optimal nonpharmacologic management. Exercise is recommended, but no specific exercise-based treatment has been found to be most effective.OBJECTIVE To determine whether an exercise-based treatment of person-specific motor skill training (MST) in performance of functional activities is more effective in improving function than strength and flexibility exercise (SFE) immediately, 6 months, and 12 months following treatment. The effect of booster treatments 6 months following treatment also was examined. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSIn this single-blind, randomized clinical trial of people with chronic, nonspecific LBP with 12-month follow-up, recruitment spanned December 2013 to August 2016 (final follow-up, November 2017), and testing and treatment were performed at an academic medical center. Recruitment was conducted by way of flyers, physician and physical therapy offices, advertisements, and media interviews at Washington University in St Louis, Missouri. Of 1595 adults screened for eligibility, 1301 did not meet the inclusion criteria and 140 could not be scheduled for the first visit. A total of 154 people with at least 12 months of chronic, nonspecific LBP, aged 18 to 60 years, with modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) score of at least 20% were randomized to either MST or SFE. Data were analyzed between December 1, 2017, and October 6, 2020.INTERVENTIONS Participants received 6 weekly 1-hour sessions of MST in functional activity performance or SFE of the trunk and lower limbs. Half of the participants in each group received up to 3 booster treatments 6 months following treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe primary outcome was the modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) score (0%-100%) evaluated immediately, 6 months, and 12 months following treatment.RESULTS A total of 149 participants (91 women; mean [SD] age, 42.5 [11.7] years) received some treatment and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Following treatment, MODQ scores were lower for MST than SFE by 7.9 (95% CI, 4.7 to 11.0; P < .001). During the follow-up phase, the MST group maintained lower MODQ scores than the SFE group, 5.6 lower at 6 months (95% CI, 2.1 to 9.1) and 5.7 lower at 12 months (95% CI, 2.2 to 9.1). Booster sessions did not change MODQ scores in either treatment.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE People with chronic LBP who received MST had greater short-term and long-term improvements in function than those who received SFE. Person-specific MST in functional activities limited owing to LBP should be considered in the treatment of people with chronic LBP.

No abstract