Contact with HIV-1 envelope protein elicits release of ATP through pannexin-1 channels on target cells; by activating purinergic receptors and Pyk2 kinase in target cells, this extracellular ATP boosts HIV-1 infectivity.

Overall, we provide the first demonstration that RNase H inhibition by DKAs is due not only to their chelating properties but also to specific interactions with highly conserved amino acid residues in the RNase H domain, leading to effective targeting of HIV retrotranscription in cells and hence offering important insights for the rational design of RNase H inhibitors.

BackgroundHIV-1 DNA is found both integrated in the host chromosome and unintegrated in various forms: linear (DNAL) or circular (1-LTRc, 2-LTRc or products of auto-integration). Here, based on pre-established strategies, we extended and characterized in terms of sensitivity two methodologies for quantifying 1-LTRc and DNAL, respectively, the latter being able to discriminate between unprocessed or 3′-processed DNA.ResultsQuantifying different types of viral DNA genome individually provides new information about the dynamics of all viral DNA forms and their interplay. For DNAL, we found that the 3′-processing reaction was efficient during the early stage of the replication cycle. Moreover, strand-transfer inhibitors (Dolutegravir, Elvitegravir, Raltegravir) affected 3′-processing differently. The comparisons of 2-LTRc accumulation mediated by either strand-transfer inhibitors or catalytic mutation of integrase indicate that 3′-processing efficiency did not influence the total 2-LTRc accumulation although the nature of the LTR-LTR junction was qualitatively affected. Finally, a significant proportion of 1-LTRc was generated concomitantly with reverse transcription, although most of the 1-LTRc were produced in the nucleus.ConclusionsWe describe the fate of viral DNA forms during HIV-1 infection. Our study reveals the interplay between various forms of the viral DNA genome, the distribution of which can be affected by mutations and by inhibitors of HIV-1 viral proteins. In the latter case, the quantification of 3′-processed DNA in infected cells can be informative about the mechanisms of future integrase inhibitors directly in the cell context.

Integrase (IN), the HIV-1 enzyme responsible for the integration of the viral genome into the chromosomes of infected cells, is the target of the recently approved antiviral raltegravir (RAL). Despite this drug's activity against viruses resistant to other antiretrovirals, failures of raltegravir therapy were observed, in association with the emergence of resistance due to mutations in the integrase coding region. Two pathways involving primary mutations on residues N155 and Q148 have been characterized. It was suggested that mutations at residue Y143 might constitute a third primary pathway for resistance. The aims of this study were to investigate the susceptibility of HIV-1 Y143R/C mutants to raltegravir and to determine the effects of these mutations on the IN-mediated reactions. Our observations demonstrate that Y143R/C mutants are strongly impaired for both of these activities in vitro. However, Y143R/C activity can be kinetically restored, thereby reproducing the effect of the secondary G140S mutation that rescues the defect associated with the Q148R/H mutants. A molecular modeling study confirmed that Y143R/C mutations play a role similar to that determined for Q148R/H mutations. In the viral replicative context, this defect leads to a partial block of integration responsible for a weak replicative capacity. Nevertheless, the Y143 mutant presented a high level of resistance to raltegravir. Furthermore, the 50% effective concentration (EC 50 ) determined for Y143R/C mutants was significantly higher than that obtained with G140S/Q148R mutants. Altogether our results not only show that the mutation at position Y143 is one of the mechanisms conferring resistance to RAL but also explain the delayed emergence of this mutation.

Purpose Cancer treatments using tumor defects in DNA repair pathways have shown promising results but are restricted to small subpopulations of patients. The most advanced drugs in this field are Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi), which trigger synthetic lethality in tumors with Homologous Recombination (HR) deficiency. Using AsiDNA, an inhibitor of HR and Non Homologous End Joining, together with PARPi should allow bypassing the genetic restriction for PARPi efficacy. Experimental design We characterized the DNA repair inhibition activity of PARPi (olaparib) and AsiDNA by monitoring repair foci formation and DNA damage. We analyzed the cell survival to standalone and combined treatments of 21 tumor cells, and 3 non-tumor cells. In 12 Breast Cancer (BC) cell lines, correlation with sensitivity to each drug and transcriptome were statistically analyzed to identify resistance pathways. Results Molecular analyses demonstrate that olaparib and AsiDNA respectively prevent recruitment of XRCC1 and RAD51/53BP1 repair enzymes to damage sites. Combination of both drugs increases the accumulation of unrepaired damage resulting in an increase of cell death in all tumor cells. In contrast, non-tumor cells do not show an increase of DNA damage nor lethality. Analysis of multi-level omics data from BC cells highlighted different DNA repair and cell cycle molecular profiles associated with resistance to AsiDNA or olaparib, rationalizing combined treatment. Treatment synergy was also confirmed with 6 other PARPi in development. Conclusion Our results highlight the therapeutic interest of combining AsiDNA and PARPi to recapitulate synthetic lethality in all tumors independently of their HR status.

BackgroundGenomic integration, an obligate step in the HIV-1 replication cycle, is blocked by the integrase inhibitor raltegravir. A consequence is an excess of unintegrated viral DNA genomes, which undergo intramolecular ligation and accumulate as 2-LTR circles. These circularized genomes are also reliably observed in vivo in the absence of antiviral therapy and they persist in non-dividing cells. However, they have long been considered as dead-end products that are not precursors to integration and further viral propagation.ResultsHere, we show that raltegravir action is reversible and that unintegrated viral DNA is integrated in the host cell genome after raltegravir removal leading to HIV-1 replication. Using quantitative PCR approach, we analyzed the consequences of reversing prolonged raltegravir-induced integration blocks. We observed, after RAL removal, a decrease of 2-LTR circles and a transient increase of linear DNA that is subsequently integrated in the host cell genome and fuel new cycles of viral replication.ConclusionsOur data highly suggest that 2-LTR circles can be used as a reserve supply of genomes for proviral integration highlighting their potential role in the overall HIV-1 replication cycle.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12977-015-0153-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

No abstract

Lipid mediators such as prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) play a central role during atherogenesis as a consequence of inflammation. PGE2 is produced from phospholipids by a cascade of enzymatic reactions involving phospholipase A2 (PLA2), cyclooxygenase (COX), and prostaglandin E synthase (PGES). It is released by several cell types, including vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Recent work has shown that the secretory PLA2-IIA (sPLA2-IIA), the most abundant isoform of secreted PLA2 in VSMCs, acts as a potent cytokine and activates VSMCs through a positive feedback loop. High mobility group protein 1 (HMGB1), also known as amphoterin, is a ubiquitous protein that plays various roles in the nucleus. HMGB1 is released by necrotic cells and by immune cells in response to various inflammatory mediators and acts as a potent proinflammatory cytokine. The present study investigates the role of HMGB1 in the activation of sPLA2-IIA expression and PGE2 production in VSMCs. Recombinant HMGB1 slightly activated the sPLA2-IIA, COX-2, and mPGES-1 genes but dramatically stimulated these genes in VSMCs that had been incubated with the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1beta for 24 h. This effect was accompanied by significantly increased PGE2 release. Induction of the three known receptors of HMGB1, namely RAGE, TLR-2, and TLR-4, by IL-1beta suggests that proinflammatory cytokines sensitize VSMCs to HMGB1. This provides new insights into the role of HMGB1 in VSMCs, suggesting it may be essential for the progression of atherosclerosis.