The lack of information regarding exercise program assessment tools during the COVID-19 pandemic was the main gap in this research. The purpose of this study was to investigate lecturers' perceptions of computer-based and paper pencil-based performance to assess sports training programs during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, a combination of quantitative and qualitative (mixed) is used as a method. Participants in this study were male and female lecturers from Jakarta State University (N=15) and Sriwijaya University (N=10). Quantitative instruments use questionnaires and qualitative instruments use in-depth interviews with participants. Quantitative data analysis use the IBM SPSS version 25.0 to find descriptive data, namely mean, standard deviation and percentage of responses from participation. Meanwhile, qualitative data analysis use qualitative thematic data. The results of the study based on quantitative data found that the majority of lecturers strongly agreed to use computer-based instead of paper pencil-based to assess sports training programs. Meanwhile, research results based on qualitative data show that most lecturers favour computer-based over paper pencil-based during the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, computer-based has better performance and advantages than paper pencil-based when used in the pandemic era. This research provides benefits for the development of science assessment tools in the field of sports.
This study aims to reveal the significance of changes in the abilities of athletic athletes at the Student Sports Training Center in the Special Capital Region of Jakarta. The study was carried out during the pandemic for 5 months with a quantitative approach, descriptive and inferential analysis was carried out using the normality test method and the paired sample T-Test significance test. The results showed normal research data with no significant relationship between abdominal muscular endurance variables and 20m running speed physical test results after and before the treatment was carried out. The results of the paired sample T-test showed no significant correlation between the variables studied, with the results of the calculation of paired sample correlations p=0.194 on sit-ups 1 and 2 data, and p=0.083 for 20m running speed data at a significance level of =0.05. The results of the paired sample test showed that there was no significant difference between the abdominal strength variables and the 20m running speed, with the data showing p= 0.28 for the sit-ups T-test results and p=0501 for the paired 20m running speed T-test results at =0.05.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.