Objective: The Miranda v. Arizona (1966) decision was intended to protect individuals’ rights in custodial situations. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate Miranda abilities of individuals with intellectual disability and evaluate the utility of intelligence in predicting these abilities. Additionally, we aimed to provide an updated resource for forensic examiners regarding the performance of individuals with intellectual disability on the Standardized Assessment of Miranda Abilities (SAMA). Hypotheses: We hypothesized that IQ, particularly verbal intelligence and working memory, would significantly predict abilities related to recall, vocabulary, knowledge, and acquiescence in a sample with intellectual disability. Method: Sixty-two individuals diagnosed with intellectual disability completed the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–4th ed. (WAIS-IV), the SAMA, and a background questionnaire. Results: Participants demonstrated significantly worse Miranda abilities when compared to the normative sample of the SAMA apart from acquiescence, which they demonstrated at significantly higher rates. Participants exhibited limited existing knowledge of Miranda rights and showed minimal improvement following exposure to a Miranda warning. Verbal abilities were a significant predictor of recall and vocabulary abilities with large effect sizes on average (i.e., ds > 1). IQ was not predictive of misconceptions about Miranda or acquiescence. Conclusions: Verbal intelligence was an important contributor to understanding Miranda. This study provided data related to performance on the SAMA by a sample of individuals with intellectual disability. It may serve as a reference for evaluators, legal professionals, and law enforcement officers when working with justice-involved persons with suspected intellectual disability.
In May 2016, the U.S. Department of Justice released a report describing the aging of the state prison population from 1993 to 2013 (Carson & Sabol, 2016). During this period, the number of prisoners aged 55 or older sentenced to serve more than 1 year increased 400% (in 1993, 3% of the total state prison population was 55 or older whereas in 2013 this figure rose to 10%). Some reasons for this increase are longer sentences in the United States and the international demographic shift toward longer lifespans. Notably, the United States incarcerates more individuals per capita than does any other nation (Wilper et al., 2009). On December 31, 2013, 40% of state prisoners aged 55 or older had been imprisoned for at least 10 years, compared with 9% in 1993 (Carson & Sabol, 2016). Between 1993 and 2013, more than 65% of prisoners aged 55 or older were serving time for violent offenses, compared with a maximum of 58% for other age groups. Forty percent of such prisoners were admitted to prison after age 55 (Carson & Sabol, 2016). Carson (2014) summarized the demographic characteristics of federal and state prison
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.