Background: There are potential conflicts between authorities and companies to fund new premium priced drugs especially where there are safety and/or budget concerns. Dabigatran, a new oral anticoagulant for the prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), exemplifies this issue. Whilst new effective treatments are needed, there are issues in the elderly with dabigatran due to variable drug concentrations, no known antidote and dependence on renal elimination. Published studies have shown dabigatran to be cost-effective but there are budget concerns given the prevalence of AF. There are also issues with potentially re-designing anticoagulant services. This has resulted in activities across countries to better manage its use.Objective: To (i) review authority activities in over 30 countries and regions, (ii) use the findings to develop new models to better manage the entry of new drugs, and (iii) review the implications for all major stakeholder groups.Methodology: Descriptive review and appraisal of activities regarding dabigatran and the development of guidance for groups through an iterative process.Results: There has been a plethora of activities among authorities to manage the prescribing of dabigatran including extensive pre-launch activities, risk sharing arrangements, prescribing restrictions, and monitoring of prescribing post-launch. Reimbursement has been denied in some countries due to concerns with its budget impact and/or excessive bleeding. Development of a new model and future guidance is proposed to better manage the entry of new drugs, centering on three pillars of pre-, peri-, and post-launch activities.Conclusion: Models for introducing new drugs are essential to optimize their prescribing especially where there are concerns. Without such models, new drugs may be withdrawn prematurely and/or struggle for funding.

Considerable variety in how patients respond to treatments, driven by differences in their geno- and/ or phenotypes, calls for a more tailored approach. This is already happening, and will accelerate with developments in personalized medicine. However, its promise has not always translated into improvements in patient care due to the complexities involved. There are also concerns that advice for tests has been reversed, current tests can be costly, there is fragmentation of funding of care, and companies may seek high prices for new targeted drugs. There is a need to integrate current knowledge from a payer’s perspective to provide future guidance. Multiple findings including general considerations; influence of pharmacogenomics on response and toxicity of drug therapies; value of biomarker tests; limitations and costs of tests; and potentially high acquisition costs of new targeted therapies help to give guidance on potential ways forward for all stakeholder groups. Overall, personalized medicine has the potential to revolutionize care. However, current challenges and concerns need to be addressed to enhance its uptake and funding to benefit patients.

PurposeIntroduction of the direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection has been challenging in all health systems. In Sweden, a national protocol for managed introduction was developed. It was optional, but all county councils agreed to implement and follow it. The purpose of this study was to study (a) cure rates among all patients initiated on treatment in 2014–2015, (b) prescribers’ adherence to the drug recommendations and treatment eligibility criteria in the protocol, and (c) introduction rate in the six Swedish healthcare regions.MethodA cross-sectional study where national data from the Prescribed Drug Register and the quality register InfCare Hepatitis defined the study population, and clinical data from the Patient Register and InfCare Hepatitis were used to monitor outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used.ResultsA total of 3447 patients were initiated on treatment during 2014–2015. The overall cure rate, based on data from 85% of the cohort, was 96%, with variation between genotypes. Adherence to drug recommendations increased over time and varied between 43.2 and 94.2%. Adherence to the treatment eligibility criteria was initially 80% and increased to 87% when treatment restrictions were widened. The introduction rate differed initially between the regions and reached stable levels 15–18 months after the launch of the first DAA.ConclusionThe estimated overall cure rate was 96%, with some variations between genotypes. A high level of adherence to the introduction protocol as well as similar introduction rates in the health care regions indicate that the introduction protocol, alongside with other measures taken, contributed considerably to a rapid uptake and equal distribution of DAAs in Sweden.

ImportanceThe totality of the societal and individual impact of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is unknown, as is the potential to prognosticate TRD. The generalizability of many observational studies on TRD is limited.ObjectiveTo estimate the burden of TRD in a large population-wide cohort in an area with universal health care by including data from both health care types (psychiatric and nonpsychiatric) and, further, to develop a prognostic model for clinical use.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study, a population-based observational study, assessed data from the Stockholm MDD Cohort for episodes of major depressive disorder (MDD) between 2010 and 2017 that fulfilled predefined criteria for TRD (≥3 consecutive antidepressant treatments). Data analysis was performed from August 2020 to May 2022.Main Outcomes and MeasuresOutcomes were psychiatric and nonpsychiatric comorbid conditions, antidepressant treatments, health care resource utilization, lost workdays, all-cause mortality, and intentional self-harm and, in the prognostic model, TRD.ResultsA total of 158 169 unipolar MDD episodes (in 145 577 patients) were identified between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017 (64.7% women; median [IQR] age, 42 years [30-56]). Of these, 12 793 episodes (11%) fulfilled criteria for TRD. The median (IQR) time from the start of MDD episode to TRD was 552 days (294-932). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor was the most common class of antidepressant treatment in all treatment steps, and 5907 patients (46.2%) received psychotherapy at some point before initiation of the third pharmacological antidepressant treatment. Compared with matched non-TRD episodes, TRD episodes had more inpatient bed-days (mean, 3.9 days; 95% CI, 3.6-4.1, vs 1.3 days; 95% CI, 1.2-1.4) and more lost workdays (mean, 132.3 days; 95% CI, 129.5-135.1, vs 58.7 days; 95% CI, 56.8-60.6) 12 months after the index date. Anxiety, stress, sleep disorder, and substance use disorder were all more common comorbid conditions in TRD episodes. Intentional self-harm was more than 4 times more common in TRD episodes. The all-cause mortality rate for patients with MDD with TRD episodes was 10.7/1000 person-years at risk, compared with 8.7/1000 person-years at risk for patients with MDD without TRD episodes (hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07-1.41). Median time from start of the first antidepressant treatment to start of the second, and from start of the second antidepressant treatment to start of the third, was 165 and 197 days, respectively. The severity of MDD, defined using the self-rating Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-S) at time of MDD diagnosis, was found to be the most important prognostic factor for TRD (C index = 0.69).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, TRD was a common variant of MDD when including patients from both health care types, which is associated with a high disease burden for both patients and society. The median time between initiation of new antidepressant treatments was longer than recommended in current treatment guidelines, suggesting room for more structured and timely depression care.

Objective Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent condition and a significant contributor to global disability. The vast majority of MDD is handled by primary care, but most real‐life studies on MDD only include data from secondary care. The aim of this study was therefore to estimate the total clinical and societal burden of incident MDD including data from all healthcare levels in a large well‐defined western European healthcare region. Methods Population‐wide observational study included healthcare data from Region Stockholm, Sweden's largest region with approximately 2.4 million inhabitants. All patients in Region Stockholm having their first unipolar MDD episode between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018, were included. The sample also included matched study population controls. Outcomes were psychiatric and non‐psychiatric comorbid conditions, antidepressant therapy use, healthcare resource utilization, work loss, and all‐cause mortality. Results In the study period, 137,822 patients in Region Stockholm were diagnosed with their first unipolar MDD episode. Compared with matched controls, MDD patients had a higher burden of non‐psychiatric and psychiatric comorbid conditions, 3.2 times higher outpatient healthcare resource utilization and 8.6 times more work loss. MDD was also associated with a doubled all‐cause mortality compared with matched controls (HR: 2.2 [95% CI: 2.0–2.4]). Conclusions The high mortality, morbidity, healthcare resource utilization, and work loss found in this study confirms that MDD is associated with individual suffering and low functioning leading to substantial costs for patients and society. These findings should motivate additional efforts in improving outcomes for MDD patients.