Real-time elastography is a method for visualization of the elastic properties of soft tissue and may potentially enable differentiation between malignant and benign pathologic lesions. Our aim was to validate the method on a tissue-mimicking (TM) phantom and to evaluate the influence of different scanning parameters and investigator variability. A TM-phantom containing eight spherical inclusions with known storage modulus was examined using two different transducers on an ultrasound (US) scanner equipped with software for real-time elasticity imaging. The ultrasound transducers were moved vertically in a repetitive manner to induce strain. Two investigators performed series of standardized elastography scans applying a 0-4 categorical quality scale to evaluate the influence of seven parameters: dynamic range of elasticity, region-of-interest, frequency of transducer movement, rejection of elastogram noise, frame rate, persistence and smoothing. Subsequently, repeated examinations of four selected inclusions were performed using a visual analog scale (VAS) where investigators marked a 100 mm horizontal line representing the span in image quality based on experience from the first examination. The hardest and softest inclusions were imaged more clearly than the inclusions with elasticity more similar to the background material. Intraobserver agreement on elastogram quality was good (kappa: 0.67 - 0.75) and interobserver agreement average (kappa: 0.55 - 0.56) when using the categorical scale. The subsequent VAS evaluation gave intraclass-correlation coefficients for the two observers of 0.98 and 0.93, respectively, and an interclass-correlation coefficient of 0.93. Real-time elastography adequately visualized isoechoic inclusions with different elastic properties in a TM-phantom with acceptable intra- and interobserver agreement. Dynamic range of elasticity was the parameter with most impact on the elastographic visualization of inclusions.

No abstract

In the last two decades, there has been substantial development in the diagnostic possibilities for examining the small intestine. Compared with computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, capsule endoscopy and double-balloon endoscopy, ultrasonography has the advantage of being cheap, portable, flexible and user- and patient-friendly, while at the same time providing the clinician with image data of high temporal and spatial resolution. The method has limitations with penetration in obesity and with intestinal air impairing image quality. The flexibility ultrasonography offers the examiner also implies that a systematic approach during scanning is needed. This paper reviews the basic scanning techniques and new modalities such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound, elastography, strain rate imaging, hydrosonography, allergosonography, endoscopic sonography and nutritional imaging, and the literature on disease-specific findings in the small intestine. Some of these methods have shown clinical benefit, while others are under research and development to establish their role in the diagnostic repertoire. However, along with improved overall image quality of new ultrasound scanners, these methods have enabled more anatomical and physiological changes in the small intestine to be observed. Accordingly, ultrasound of the small intestine is an attractive clinical tool to study patients with a range of diseases.

The purpose of this study was to develop a sonographic method to monitor postprandial size of the proximal stomach. Twenty-three healthy persons were scanned in a sitting position with a 3.25 MHz transducer after ingestion of 500 ml meat soup. The area in a sagittal section and the maximal diameter in an oblique frontal section were chosen as standard measurements. The soup emptied from the proximal stomach in a linear manner (r = 0.99) and at a rate of 2.0 +/- 1.3%/min. Intraobserver error of the scans (mean +/- SD) was 5.6% +/- 2.3% and 9.5% +/- 4.5% for sagittal area and frontal diameter, respectively, and the corresponding interobserver error was 5.3% +/- 4.0% and 8.3% +/- 5.3%, respectively. This sonographic method demonstrated a moderate day-to-day variation, had low intra- and interobserver error, and allowed estimation of initial emptying fractions of the proximal stomach.

PURPOSE: Real-time elastography (RTE) is an ultrasound-based method for the visualization of relative strain distribution in soft tissues. Strain ratio is a semi-quantitative measurement of strain differences between two user-defined areas in an elastogram. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the size and location of a reference area when measuring the strain ratio of focal lesions in a tissue-mimicking phantom and in normal liver tissue. We also investigated whether the strain ratio was affected by changing the scanner parameter: elasticity dynamic range (E-dyn). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two investigators individually collected data by scanning 4 spherical inclusions with different elasticity in a phantom in which the elastic modulus was known in both the lesions and the background. Subsequently, a liver scan was performed in-vivo using the same scanning protocol. Five different setups with changes in reference area position or size were tested. All eight levels of the scanner setting E-dyn were recorded for each setup and the strain ratio was measured in 3 different representative elastograms for each recording situation. RESULTS: The four inclusions had significantly different mean strain ratio levels (p < 0.01) when compared to the surrounding material. Changing the position of the reference area to a deeper position influenced the strain ratio measurements significantly for all phantom lesions and in the liver. Changing the size of the reference area, while keeping the center depth unchanged, did not influence the mean strain ratio levels significantly. The strain ratio was independent of the E-dyn parameter setting. The intra- and interobserver reliability was high when measuring the strain ratio with a free-hand technique. CONCLUSION: Strain ratio provides reproducible measurements of inclusions representing different elastic contrasts using a free-hand technique in vitro. Changes in the distance of the reference areas to the ultrasound probe, representing the stress source, seem to have a significant impact on strain ratio measurements.

No abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether ultrasound-based strain imaging can discriminate between colorectal adenocarcinomas and stenotic Crohn?s lesions in newly resected surgical specimens. Materials and Methods: Resected surgical specimens from 27 patients electively operated for colorectal tumors or stenotic lesions from Crohn?s disease were prospectively examined with ultrasonography using a Hitachi HV 900 US scanner with real-time elastography (RTE). Three different methods were applied to assess tissue strain: A four-level categorical visual classification, a continuous visual analog scale (VAS, 0???100) and a strain ratio (SR) measurement between the lesion and surrounding reference tissue. The imaged sections were marked and subsequently examined by a pathologist. Results from RTE were evaluated according to diagnosis, degree of fibrosis, inflammatory parameters, tumor stage and grade. Results: 16 sections from Crohn?s lesions, 18 sections from adenocarcinomas and 4 sections from adenomas were examined. Both adenocarcinomas and Crohn?s lesions were found to be harder than the surrounding tissue, but they could not be discriminated from each other by any of the strain imaging evaluation methods. All adenocarcinomas had significantly higher strain ratios than adenomas. The categorical classification differentiated poorly between Crohn?s lesions, adenocarcinomas and adenomas. Categorical evaluation and VAS score showed fair interobserver agreement. SR measurements provided semi-quantitative strain data and added improved information about elasticity properties, despite substantial intra-observer variation. Conclusion: Sonoelastography with SR measurements and visual evaluation of strain differences could not differentiate stenotic Crohn?s lesions from adenocarcinomas in resected bowel specimens. A small number of adenomas were found to be significantly softer than adenocarcinomas using the same evaluation methods. The tumor stage or grade did not have a significant impact on the elastography results.

The Gatekeeper Reflux Repair System is a safe endoscopic treatment modality that significantly improves GERD symptoms and has objective effects on acid reflux.