Aim A whole-of-community approach can be defined as a range of intervention strategies simultaneously implemented across a whole community. One possibility for the lack of evidence for the effectiveness of this type of approach to reducing alcohol-related harm is that whole-ofcommunity strategies to date have not examined whether this type of approach, relative to alternative strategies, is acceptable to communities. Methods The acceptability of a whole-of-community approach and a range of uni-dimensional strategies are examined using 3,017 survey responses from a random sample of 7,985 individuals (aged 18-62) across 20 rural communities in NSW, Australia, as part of a large-scale randomised controlled trial: the Alcohol Action in Rural Communities (AARC) project. Using the Australian Electoral Roll, the sample was selected to reflect specific characteristics (i.e., gender and age) of each participating town as defined in the Australian Bureau of Statistics 2001 census. Results Relative to other commonly implemented intervention strategies, the whole-of-community approach acceptability rating (85.5%) was statistically significantly greater than increased random breath testing (80.7%), pharmacist information (76.2%) and workplace training (77.0%), and less than increased pub/club compliance (95.8%), highschool programs (96.2%), increased police enforcement (89.5%) and hospital-based advice (88.6%). Intervention acceptability ratings were not associated with exposure to the suggested intervention with two exceptions: those exposed to pub/club compliance provided a lower acceptability rating, while those exposed to workplace training/ policies provided a higher acceptability rating. Conclusions The high level of public support for alcohol interventions and the relatively low exposure to such interventions suggest scope for increasing awareness of intervention activity in communities and implementing a coherent whole-of-community approach.
A substantial proportion of adolescent antisocial behaviour (ASB) research has focused on identifying the chronic offender; comparatively little research has investigated developmental patterns among the general adolescent population, who account for a large proportion of ASB participation. A modified version of the Mak Self-Report Behaviour Scale was administered to 233 (relatively advantaged) community adolescents (aged 9-17), and 193 young adults (aged 18-25). Not available in previous instruments, in addition to prevalence rates, the Adolescent ASB Scale (AASBS) accurately identifies specifically when adolescents enter, exit, and peak in their ASB participation. An earlier age of ASB participation was associated with greater frequency, severity and duration. The most noteworthy finding was a mid-adolescent peak in ASB participation, which was shorter and more dramatic for girls. These findings provide knowledge critical for informing future research into causal explanations for the temporary and dramatic increase in adolescent ASB, and for developing more effective intervention practices with mainstream youth.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.