No abstract

Objective.-To provide evidence-based treatment recommendations for adults with acute migraine who require treatment with injectable medication in an emergency department (ED). We addressed two clinically relevant questions: (1) Which injectable medications should be considered first-line treatment for adults who present to an ED with acute migraine? (2) Do parenteral corticosteroids prevent recurrence of migraine in adults discharged from an ED?Methods.-The American Headache Society convened an expert panel of authors who defined a search strategy and then performed a search of Medline, Embase, the Cochrane database and clinical trial registries from inception through 2015. Identified articles were rated using the American Academy of Neurology's risk of bias tool. For each medication, the expert panel determined likelihood of efficacy. Recommendations were created accounting for efficacy, adverse events, availability of alternate therapies, and principles of medication action.Results/Conclusions.-The search identified 68 unique randomized controlled trials utilizing 28 injectable medications. Of these, 19 were rated class 1 (low risk of bias), 21 were rated class 2 (higher risk of bias), and 28 were rated class 3 (highest risk of bias). Metoclopramide, prochlorperazine, and sumatriptan each had multiple class 1 studies supporting acute efficacy, as did dexamethasone for prevention of headache recurrence. All other medications had lower levels of evidence.Recommendations.-Intravenous metoclopramide and prochlorperazine, and subcutaneous sumatriptan should be offered to eligible adults who present to an ED with acute migraine (Should offer-Level B). Dexamethasone should be offered to these patients to prevent recurrence of headache (Should offer-Level B). Because of lack of evidence demonstrating efficacy and concern about sub-acute or long-term sequelae, injectable morphine and hydromorphone are best avoided as first-line therapy (May avoid-Level C).

The HIT-6 and MIDAS appear to measure headache-related disability in a similar fashion. However, some important differences may exist. Headache intensity appears to influence HIT-6 score more than the MIDAS, whereas the MIDAS was influenced more by headache frequency. Using the HIT-6 and MIDAS together may give a more accurate assessment of a patient's headache-related disability.

We strongly recommend the use of prochlorperazine based on a high level of evidence, lysine acetylsalicylic acid, metoclopramide and sumatriptan, based on a moderate level of evidence, and ketorolac, based on a low level of evidence. We weakly recommend the use of chlorpromazine based on a moderate level of evidence, and ergotamine, dihydroergotamine, lidocaine intranasal and meperidine, based on a low level of evidence. We found evidence to recommend strongly against the use of dexamethasone, based on a moderate level of evidence, and granisetron, haloperidol and trimethobenzamide based on a low level of evidence. Based on moderate-quality evidence, we recommend weakly against the use of acetaminophen and magnesium sulfate. Based on low-quality evidence, we recommend weakly against the use of diclofenac, droperidol, lidocaine intravenous, lysine clonixinate, morphine, propofol, sodium valproate and tramadol.

Rizatriptan is a selective 5-HT_1B/1D receptor agonist with rapid oral absorption and early onset of action in the acute treatment of migraine. This randomized double- blind crossover outpatient study assessed the preference for 1 rizatriptan 10 mg tablet to 2 ergotamine 1 mg/caffeine 100 mg tablets in 439 patients treating a single migraine attack with each therapy. Of patients expressing a preference (89.1%), more than twice as many preferred rizatriptan to ergotamine/caffeine (69.9 vs. 30.1%, p ≤ 0.001). Faster relief of headache was the most important reason for preference, cited by 67.3% of patients preferring rizatriptan and 54.2% of patients who preferred ergotamine/caffeine. The co-primary endpoint of being pain free at 2 h was also in favor of rizatriptan. Forty-nine percent of patients were pain free 2 h after rizatriptan, compared with 24.3% treated with ergotamine/caffeine (p ≤ 0.001), rizatriptan being superior within 1 h of treatment. Headache relief at 2 h was 75.9% for rizatriptan and 47.3% for ergotamine/caffeine (p ≤ 0.001), with rizatriptan being superior to ergotamine/caffeine within 30 min of dosing. Almost 36% of patients taking rizatriptan were pain free at 2 h and had no recurrence or need for additional medication within 24 h, compared to 20% of patients on ergotamine/caffeine (p ≤ 0.001). Rizatriptan was also superior to ergotamine/caffeine in the proportions of patients with no nausea, vomiting, phonophobia or photophobia and for patients with normal function 2 h after drug intake (p ≤ 0.001). More patients were (completely, very or somewhat) satisfied 2 h after treatment with rizatriptan (69.8%) than at 2 h after treatment with ergotamine/caffeine (38.6%, p ≤ 0.001). Recurrence rates were 31.4% with rizatriptan and 15.3% with ergotamine/caffeine. Both active treatments were well tolerated. The most common adverse events (incidence ≧5% in one group) after rizatriptan and ergotamine/caffeine, respectively, were dizziness (6.7 and 5.3%), nausea (4.2 and 8.5%) and somnolence (5.5 and 2.3%).

Substantially more women than men develop multiple sclerosis (MS), but information about the effects of MS and gender-specific issues such as pregnancy, breastfeeding, menstruation and hormone use is lacking. A survey study of neurologists' practice patterns was undertaken to elicit information about gender-specific topics and the use of disease-modifying MS therapies (DMT) including the interferons and glatiramer acetate (GA). A total of 147 surveys were returned. Half of respondents require patients to discontinue DMT during pregnancy, while 35% encourage discontinuation. Among those who allow patients to continue therapy, half consider GA to be safer during pregnancy than the interferons. Nearly 86% of respondents do not use DMT in patients who are breastfeeding. Among the 11% who actually prescribe during breastfeeding, most recommend GA. Neurologists generally leave the decision to breastfeed up to patients, and most refer patients to obstetrician/gynaecologists for counselling about contraception or hormone replacement therapy. The survey results described here provide insight into how neurologists manage reproductive health issues among women with MS.

ABSTRACT:Objective:To examine demographic characteristics and clinical features of headache patients referred to neurologists specializing in headache in Canada.Methods:Demographic and clinical data were collected at the time of consultation for 865 new headache patients referred to five headache-specialty clinics in Canada. The Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) and Migraine Disability Questionnaire (MIDAS) were used to measure headache impact and disability. Data were analyzed as part of the Canadian Headache Outpatient Registry and Database (CHORD) Project.Results:The average age of the patients was 40 years and the majority were female (78%). Most were employed either full time (49%) or part time (13%). The majority of patients were diagnosed with either migraine or tension-type headache (78%). Over a third of patients experienced headache every day, and half had experienced a headache in the previous month which was of severe intensity. Most (80%) scored in the “very severe” category of the HIT-6 and over half (55%) were severely disabled as measured by the MIDAS.Conclusion:Patients referred to headache specialists in Canada are severely disabled by their headache disorders. These patients are in the most productive phase of their lives in terms of age and employment. It is important to provide the best available treatment to headache patients in order to minimize the disability and impact of their headache disorders.

Migraine is a common neurological disorder that is characterized by episodic headaches associated with symptoms such as nausea, visual disturbances, photophobia, and phonophobia. In Canada, approximately 7% of adult males and 22% of adult females suffer from migraine. 1 Migraine symptoms result in a considerable burden with regard to health care utilization, health care costs, and work/productivity loss due to disability and decreased functional status. [2][3][4][5][6] Clinical trials have demonstrated that sumatriptan (Imitrex®, GlaxoSmithKline) is effective in relieving migraine pain. These studies have established the efficacy of sumatriptan among patients who treated their migraines at a point in which their headache pain was classified as moderate or severe. 7-11 However, ABSTRACT: Background: There is evidence that headache response rates may be higher if triptans are used early when a migraine attack is still mild, as compared to when it is treated after pain has reached moderate or severe intensity. Methods: In this randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, parallel group clinical trial, 361 patients took either placebo, sumatriptan 50 mg, or sumatriptan 100 mg in a single attack study. The primary outcome measure was pain-free status at two hours. Results: In the intention to treat group, two hour pain free rates were 16%, 40%, and 50% in the placebo group, sumatriptan 50 mg group, and the sumatriptan 100 mg group respectively (p<0.001, active treatment groups vs. placebo). Conclusions: Both sumatriptan 50 mg and 100 mg were significantly superior to placebo for the pain-free end point at two hours. The pain-free response rates in this trial where sumatriptan was taken while the headache was still mild were generally higher than in older clinical trials where headache was treated after reaching a moderate or severe intensity. RÉSUMÉ: Absence de douleur comme mesure de l'efficacité du sumatriptan pour le traitement précoce de la migraine. Contexte: Le taux de réponse serait plus élevé si les triptans sont utilisés tôt au cours d'une crise de migraine alors que les symptômes sont légers plutôt que quand la douleur est devenue modérée ou sévère. Méthodes: Il s'agit d'une étude de pharmacologie clinique randomisée, à double insu, avec placebo et groupes parallèles. 361 patients ont pris soit le placebo, le sumatriptan 50 mg ou le sumatriptan 100 mg au cours d'une seule crise migraineuse. Le critère d'évaluation primaire était l'absence de douleur 2 heures après la prise du médicament. Résultats: À l'analyse selon l'intention de traitement, le taux de patients sans douleur était de 16%, 40% et 50% pour le groupe placebo, le groupe sumatriptan 50 mg et le groupe sumatriptan 100 mg respectivement (groupes traitement actif versus placebo, p > 0,001). Conclusions: Le sumatriptan 50 mg et 100 mg étaient significativement supérieurs au placebo quant au critère d'évaluation primaire, soit l'absence de douleur 2 heures après la prise du médicament. Le taux de réponse, soit l'absence de douleur, dans cette étude ...