Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) has consistently demonstrated clinical efficacy in metastatic melanoma. Recent widespread use of checkpoint blockade has shifted the treatment landscape, raising questions regarding impact of these therapies on response to TIL and appropriate immunotherapy sequence. Seventy-four metastatic melanoma patients were treated with autologous TIL and evaluated for clinical response according to irRC, overall survival, and progression-free survival. Immunologic factors associated with response were also evaluated. Best overall response for the entire cohort was 42%; 47% in 43 checkpoint-naïve patients, 38% when patients were exposed to anti-CTLA4 alone (21 patients) and 33% if also exposed to anti-PD1 (9 patients) prior to TIL ACT. Median overall survival was 17.3 months; 24.6 months in CTLA4-naïve patients and 8.6 months in patients with prior CTLA4 blockade. The latter patients were infused with fewer TIL and experienced a shorter duration of response. Infusion of higher numbers of TIL with CD8 predominance and expression of BTLA correlated with improved response in anti-CTLA4 naïve patients, but not in anti-CTLA4 refractory patients. Baseline serum levels of IL9 predicted response to TIL ACT, while TIL persistence, tumor recognition, and mutation burden did not correlate with outcome. This study demonstrates the deleterious effects of prior exposure to anti-CTLA4 on TIL ACT response and shows that baseline IL9 levels can potentially serve as a predictive tool to select the appropriate sequence of immunotherapies. .

INO-1001 is a PARP-1 inhibitor that interrupts the repair process of N-methylpurines generated by temozolomide. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of INO-1001 and determined its safety when used with temozolomide at 200 mg/m(2)/day x 5 days every 4 weeks. We enrolled 12 adult patients, in cohorts of 3-6 patients, into the study. INO-1001 at doses of 100, 200 and 400 mg was given intravenous for 1 hr q 12 hr for 10 doses. INO-1001 had a moderate clearance, volume of distribution and a relatively short terminal half-life. Myelosuppression and elevation of liver transaminases were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of INO-1001 at 400 mg.

Uveal melanoma is a common intraocular malignant tumor that is uniformly fatal once metastatic. No effective adjuvant therapy currently exists to reduce the risk of distant metastasis after definitive treatment of the primary lesion. Immunotherapy has been used effectively in the adjuvant setting in locally advanced cutaneous melanoma. We performed a Phase I/II clinical trial of adjuvant ipilimumab in high-risk primary uveal melanoma with distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) as the primary objective. A total of 10 patients with genomically high-risk disease were treated: three at a dose of 3 mg/kg and seven at 10 mg/kg. Two of the seven patients at the higher dose had to discontinue therapy secondary to grade 3 toxicity. At 36 months follow-up, 80% of patients had no evidence of distant disease (95% CI, 58.7–100). With recent advancements in CTLA-4 inhibition, PD-1 inhibition, and combined checkpoint blockade, immunotherapy is a promising avenue of treatment in uveal melanoma. Further clinical trials are needed to elucidate the role of immunotherapy in the adjuvant setting.

Checkpoint blockade has revolutionized the treatment of melanoma; however, it benefits only the minority of patients. Several agents have been combined with immunotherapy to improve T-cell activation and persistence including growth factor, chemotherapy, and radiation. Preclinical data suggest temozolomide, which metabolizes to the same active compound as dacarbazine, selectively depletes regulatory T cells. This potential immunomodulatory effect of temozolomide provides rationale for combination with ipilimumab. We performed an open-label single-arm phase II study of ipilimumab plus temozolomide in the frontline setting for patients with metastatic melanoma and LDH <=2x upper limit of normal. Ipilimumab was given at 10 mg/kg on day 1 and temozolomide 200 mg/m2 orally days 1–4 every three weeks for four doses followed by maintenance ipilimumab every 12 weeks plus temozolomide every four weeks. The primary objective of the study was 6-month PFS. A total of 64 patients were enrolled and the 6-month PFS was 45% with median OS of 24·5 months. There were 10 (15·6%) confirmed partial responses and 10 (15·6%) confirmed complete responses. Duration of response amongst responders is 35 months with 10 patients demonstrating an ongoing response at median follow-up of 20 months. There were no deaths or unexpected toxicities on study. The most common gastrointestinal side effects were nausea and constipation rather than diarrhea or colitis. These results suggest that the combination of induction ipilimumab plus temozolomide could potentially be an effective strategy to enhance antitumor activity with a manageable toxicity profile. These findings warrant further evaluation in a large prospective study.

Objectives TPI 287 is a synthetic taxane derivative with structural modifications allowing for central nervous system (CNS) penetration and potential circumvention of multi-drug resistance efflux pump mechanisms. The objective of this Phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of TPI 287 and temozolomide in metastatic melanoma. Methods Patients with stage IV unresectable or recurrent stage III melanoma were eligible. Stable untreated or treated brain metastases were allowed. Patients with prior taxane exposure were excluded. TPI 287 was given intravenously (i.v.) on Day 1, 8, and 15 and temozolomide was taken oral daily on days 1–5 of a 28-day cycle. Responses were assessed every 2 cycles per WHO criteria. Results A total of 21 patients were enrolled. The MTD of the combination at this schedule was determined to be 125 mg/m2 i.v. of TPI 287 and 110 mg/m2 of oral temozolomide. The dose-limiting toxicity was neuropathy and 6 patients experienced Grade III neuropathy. All patients were evaluable for tumor response. There were no complete responses; there were two partial responses and seven patients had stable disease (overall response rate 9.5% and disease control rate 42.9%). Three patients had stable disease in the brain despite progressive extracranial disease. Conclusions The combination of TPI 287 and temozolomide is well-tolerated in patients with metastatic melanoma with the exception of neuropathy. The CNS penetration of both agents makes this a rational combination for further testing in primary and metastatic brain lesions.