This systematic review studies the relationship between vitamin D serum levels and basal cell carcinoma (BCC). The primary source of vitamin D is sunlight exposure. Recently, an increase in the intake of vitamin D supplements has been noticed. The protective value of vitamin D is well established and has been studied several times for the health of the bones, cartilage, growth, various dermatological diseases, and also as a chemoprotective agent against several cancers. On the scientific front, it has yet to be established that increasing serum vitamin D levels increase the incidence of BCC. We included reports that investigated this relationship in this review. We applied keywords in published papers in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, and Google Scholar to find relevant studies. After applying the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist and the quality appraisal for 68 records, we included only ten studies. In these studies, serum levels of vitamin D were measured. Five of them supported the link between BCC incidence and development and high serum vitamin D levels (e.g., Mahamat-Saleh Y, et al.), while the other five did not (e.g., Tang JY, et al.). We included only two studies that investigated the vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphism. Experts debate adding a high dose of vitamin D supplements to our daily routine. After studying most of the reports, it was ascertained that the literature supports keeping vitamin D serum levels below 30-60 nmol/L. However, further studies should be done to help find a healthy balance of vitamin D serum levels, especially when it comes to increasing the risk of cancer like BCC.

Those who received early diagnosis and treatment for poststroke depression had lower mortality rates, cognitive impairments, improved long-term disability, a higher quality of life, and lower rates of suicidal thoughts than those who did not. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 standards were used to conduct this systematic review. Until May 1, 2022, a systematic search was conducted utilizing ScienceDirect, Cochrane, PubMed, Google Scholar, and PubMed central databases, which have been used during the previous 10 years. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, systematic reviews, review articles, case reports, clinical studies, and meta-analyses were included in the research, which covered post-stroke depression patients and how to identify and treat them.There were 545 possibly related titles found in the database search. Finally, each publication was given a quality rating, and 10 studies with a score of higher than 70% were allowed into the review. Because of their brevity and ease of use, they employed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and PHQ-2 screening instruments in stroke patients. According to pooled studies, the risk of acquiring post-stroke depression (PSD) was lower in participants undergoing pharmacological therapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), especially after a year. Identifying further features of the PSD process, we believe, is the most pressing need for future study since it might lead to a more precise treatment strategy.

Substantial evidence highlights the association between physical inactivity and diabetes onset and complications. Little is known regarding the link between physical inactivity and diabetic retinopathy in terms of onset, progression, and severity. This review aims to investigate these associations and understand the underlying mechanisms behind these associations. Decreased sedentary times and the inclusion of more physical activity have been linked to the delayed onset and progression of diabetic retinopathy and less severe forms of said condition. Physical activity provides both protective and anti-inflammatory effects on the retina. Further research is needed to understand and elucidate the exact mechanisms by which lack of physical activity affects retinal health and the onset, progression, and severity of diabetic retinopathy.

This review evaluates the potential benefits of sodium-glucose transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors on symptom burden/health-related quality of life (HRQoL), functional improvement, hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), cardiovascular mortality (CVM), and all-cause mortality (ACM) in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced or preserved ejection fraction (EF). We analyzed 12 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) accessed through 11 records and three secondary analyses from PubMed and Scopus following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. These studies evaluated 23,389 patients treated with either an SGLT-2 inhibitor or placebo in addition to the standard of care. Four studies recruited diabetic patients, some of whom had HF at the baseline and were evaluated as a subgroup. One study had diabetes and HF present in all patients at the baseline. Ten studies recruited patients with HF at their baseline irrespective of diabetic status. Eight studies evaluated the SGLT-2 inhibitors for a composite of hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular mortality (HHF/CVM) and ACM. Five of these studies showed a decreased risk for HHF/CVM, and two showed a reduced risk for ACM. One trial showed benefits in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) only and not in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Other studies revealed benefits but did not reach statistical significance. Ten studies assessed the SGLT-2 inhibitors for improvement in symptoms and HRQoL; four demonstrated a significant improvement, three showed a slight improvement, and three did not find any benefit. Five trials evaluated participants' functional progress by assessing for a six-minute walk test (6MWT). Two studies showed a significant increase in the distance walked by the patient, while three others did not. The SGLT-2 inhibitors reduce the risk of HHF/CVM irrespective of ejection fraction and result in a symptomatic improvement.

A frequent complication in kidney transplantation is post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). The primary goal of this study is to review the risk factors and preventive methods and compare the different available anti-diabetic medications for the management of PTDM. We searched databases like Pubmed and Google Scholar for related articles using specific terms and phrases. Following a thorough investigation, we applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria and completed a quality assessment.Modifiable risk factors have a significant role in the development of PTDM. The combinations of immunosuppressive treatment tacrolimus (TAC), cyclosporine A (CYC), and everolimus (EVL), steroids increase the incidence of PTDM significantly. Insulin is the most effective treatment for PTDM in the early transplant period; however, oral anti-diabetic medications look promising. Further clinical trials are required to determine the optimum treatment method for reducing the occurrence of PTDM and treating the existing condition with novel anti-hyperglycemic medications.