The evidence currently available is sparse with methodological flaws, making it difficult to recommend a specific physiotherapy option. There is an urgent need for high-quality randomized controlled trials to identify the most effective physiotherapy management strategy for patients with CPP.

ABSTRACT.Purpose: To observe the excursions of short-term intraocular pressure (IOP) after 20-G pars-plana vitrectomy (ppV). Material and methods: In a prospective study, 851 patients (age: mean 63 ± 15 years) underwent unilateral ppV for various vitreoretinal diseases using different endotamponades [Balanced Salt Solution (BSS) 33.1%, Air 7.2%, SF 6 33.6%, silicon oil 5000 cst 26.1%]. Intraocular pressure was measured in all patients before and at 3, 6, 24 and 48 hr after surgery. Survival analysis was performed to determine the cumulative hazard of IOP changes depending on endotamponade and time point after ppV (Log-Rang -Mantel Cox; p < 0.0001). Results: At baseline, IOP ranged from 0 to 50 mmHg (mean IOP: 15.3 ± 5.3 mmHg). Mean IOP after surgery revealed a slight elevation (3 hr: 16.5 ± 11.0 mmHg; 6 hr 16.9 ± 9.8 mmHg; 24 hr 19.7 ± 8.0 mmHg; 48 hr 17.3 ± 6.2 mmHg; range: 0-64 mmHg). Silicon oil filling revealed highest mean values at already 3 hr after surgery (21.8 mmHg). Also, BSS filling showed a peak after 3 hr; however, mean values were lower. Equivalent high IOP values as for silicon oil tamponade were found for gas filling; however, maximal peak was reached after 24 hr but not after 3 hr post-treatment. The cumulative hazard in all patients to reach IOP ‡ 30 mmHg after 24 hr was 23.9%; (IOP ‡ 40 mmHg = 8.2%). Herein, oil filling revealed highest risk at all time points after surgery. The risk of suffering from IOP < 5 mmHg lasting longer than 6 hr was only 1.2% after 20 G vitrectomy. Conclusion: Intraocular pressure measurements after ppV are important to prevent unintentional high IOP, especially within the early phase (3 hr posttreatment) in eyes with silicon oil filling. Gas filling leads to prolonged IOP increase (24 hr post-treatment). Long-lasting hypotony ( ‡6 hr) is very rare after 20G vitrectomy.

ARP is a common acute complication, requiring close posttreatment follow-up, particularly for elderly patients. The use of gemcitabine before radiation should be avoided. The benefits and risks of CTR must be carefully analyzed, according to the dosimetric parameters.

ObjectiveTo explore feasibility in terms of delivering and evaluating a combination of physiotherapy and psychotherapy for patients with chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS).DesignProspective non-randomised controlled pilot study.SettingTertiary care facility with a specialised interdisciplinary outpatient clinic for patients with CPPS.ParticipantsA total of 311 patients was approached; 60 participated. 36 patients were included in the intervention group (mean age ±SD 48.6 years±14.8; 52.8% female) and 24 in the control group (mean age ±SD 50.6 years±14.5; 58.3% female). Fourteen participants were lost to follow-up.InterventionsParticipants were non-randomly allocated to the intervention group with two consecutive treatment modules (physiotherapy and cognitive behavioural therapy) with a duration of 9 weeks each or to the control group (treatment as usual).Main outcome measuresFeasibility was operationalised in terms of delivering and evaluating the therapeutic combination. Regarding eligibility as the first aspect of feasibility, willingness to participate, dropout and satisfaction were assessed; for the second aspect, standardised self-report questionnaires measuring health-related quality of life, depression severity and pain were applied.ResultsAlthough eligibility and willingness-to-participate rates were low, satisfaction of the participants in the intervention group was high and dropout rates were low. Results indicated a small and non-significant intervention effect in health-related quality of life and significant effects regarding depression severity and pain.ConclusionsThe combination of physiotherapy and psychotherapy for patients with CPPS seems to be feasible and potentially promising with regard to effect. However, a subsequent fully powered randomised controlled trial is needed.Trial registration numberGerman Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00009976) and ISRCTN (ISRCTN43221600).

There might be a link between psychosomatic and myofascial aspects in CPPS; thus further studies are needed. Nevertheless, the results stress the urgent need of a multimodal treatment including physiotherapy and psychotherapy in these patients.

BackgroundChronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) is a pain condition perceived in the pelvic area for at least 6 months. While evidence of the aetiology and maintenance of CPPS is still unclear and therapy options are rare, there is preliminary evidence for the efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy and physiotherapy. However, an integrated treatment has not yet been studied. The primary aim of this study is therefore to test the feasibility of combined psychotherapy and physiotherapy for female and male patients with CPPS. The secondary aim is to explore changes in patient-relevant and economic outcomes compared to a control group.MethodsA feasibility study with a crossover design based on the principles of a ‘cohort multiple randomized controlled trial’ will be conducted to test a combined therapy for patients with CPPS. The study will consist of two consecutive treatment modules (cognitive behavioural group psychotherapy and physiotherapy as individual and group sessions), which will be applied in varying order. The modules will consist of nine weekly sessions with a 4-week break between the modules. The control group will undergo treatment as usual. Study subjects will be recruited from the interdisciplinary outpatient clinic for CPPS at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf. Thirty-six patients will be assigned to the intervention, and 18 patients will be assigned to the control group. The treatment groups will be gender homogeneous. Feasibility as the primary outcome will be analysed in terms of the demand, acceptability, and practicality. Secondary study outcomes will be measured using validated self-rating-scales and physical examinations.DiscussionTo the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the feasibility of combined psychotherapy and physiotherapy for patients with CPPS. In addition to testing feasibility, the results can be used for the preliminary estimation of therapeutic effects. The results from this study will be used to generate an enhanced therapeutic approach, which might be subject to further testing in a larger study.Trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00009976. Registered on 15 March 2016.ISRCTN, ISRCTN43221600. Registered on 10 May 2016.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-017-2387-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

No abstract

No abstract