Our results show that a cross-sectional cohort of RA patients had an increased risk of death from various causes.
Aims and Methods: Mortality among RA patients and controls was analyzed with special attention to renal disease in population-based material (originally screened in 1988) of 604 patients with RA (470 females, 134 males) and 457 age- and sex-matched controls (352 females, 105 males). In the original RA population, isolated hematuria (HU) was observed in 54, isolated proteinuria (PU) in 27, combined hematuria and proteinuria (HUPU) in 7, chronic renal failure (CRFtot) in 36 and isolated chronic renal failure without HU or PU (CRFisol) in 15 patients. Among the controls, HU was observed in 39, PU in 11, CRFtot in 32 and CRFisol in 16 subjects. HUPU was not observed in any of the controls. Microalbuminuria (20–200 µg/min) was observed in 34 RA patients and in 27 controls. Histologically confirmed amyloidosis was found in 13 RA patients and mesangial glomerulonephritis (MesGN) in 17 patients. The mortality was evaluated in 1999 from data of the Statistical Office of Finland. Statistical analysis was performed by Cox regression analysis. Results: Mortality was significantly increased in the RA population as compared to controls: hazard ratio (HR) 1.78 (95% CI 1.34–2.31) for all RA patients; HR 2.12 (1.52–2.94) for females; HR 1.15 (0.75–1.77) for males. In the RA material, increased mortality was detected in patients with HUPU (HR 4.45; 1.54–12.84), PU (HR 3.54; 1.88–6.65), CRFtot (HR 3.74; 2.55–5.56) or microalbuminuria (HR 2.77; 1.64–4.69) when compared to those with normal clinical renal findings, whereas HU (HR 1.49; 0.88–2.52), CRFisol (HR 1.71; 0.82–3.54), bacteriuria (HR 0.96; 0.35–2.59) or pyuria (HR 0.65; 0.09–4.65) did not predict mortality. Renal amyloidosis was associated with an over twofold mortality rate (HR 2.31; 1.03–5.15), whereas mortality was within expected limits in RA patients with MesGN (HR 1.61; 0.49–5.24). Conclusion: Our results show that nephropathy presenting with combined hematuria and proteinuria, proteinuria, microalbuminuria or histologically confirmed amyloidosis is associated with increased mortality in RA patients, whereas mortality is within expected limits in those with isolated hematuria or mesangial glomerulonephritis.
The aim of this study was to assess, based on observational data from the Finnish Register of Biological Treatment, the outcomes of switching an initial tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker to another in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RA patients, who started biological therapy with a TNF blocker between May 1999 and April 2009 and who switched to another TNF blocker, were studied (n=479). The outcomes were assessed according to the reason for and type of the switch. Outcome assessments included American College of Rheumatology 50 responder index (ACR50) response at 3 months after the switch, treatment duration of the second TNF blocker, and swollen joint counts, CRP and DAS28 score at the 3 months, best and last observations of the first and second TNF blocker, respectively. In those who switched due to lack of effectiveness (LOE), the disease activity parameters fell significantly from baseline upon use of infliximab or adalimumab, but had increased prior to the switch. Switching to another TNF blocker (etanercept or adalimumab) restored the response initially achieved with the first TNF blocker. The disease activity parameters fell significantly from baseline upon use of etanercept, and were maintained but not further improved after switching to adalimumab. TNF blocker switching seemed to be most beneficial in secondary LOE (defined as loss of ACR50 response). In those who switched due to adverse events (AE) or other reasons, a similar degree of response as had been achieved with the first agent was also achieved and maintained with the second agent. The results suggest that a second TNF blocker can restore the response in cases of secondary LOE and maintain it after switching due to an AE.
The objective of this study was to assess the long-term prognosis of nephropathy findings and the incidence of new abnormal clinical renal findings in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The original population-based cross-sectional study of 604 RA patients was carried out in 1988, 103 nephropathy patients being found. Controls matched for age, sex, and duration of RA were selected from among RA patients with normal renal function and urinalysis in 1988. In 2003, a follow-up study was made of the 103 nephropathy patients and 102 controls, and the median follow-up time was 13 years. In the original nephropathy group, serum creatinine exceeded 200 mumol/l in 8% of the original isolated hematuria patients, in 30% of the isolated proteinuria patients, in 57% of the combined hematuria and proteinuria patients, but in none of the isolated chronic renal failure (CRF) patients (p = 0.001 for the difference). Probable or definitive renal amyloidosis was diagnosed in 19% of the nephropathy patients. Dialysis therapy was given to 10 out of the 103 nephropathy patients, nine of them belonging to the original isolated proteinuria or combined hematuria and proteinuria groups. There were six renal deaths among the nephropathy patients, and none in the controls. In the control group, new abnormal renal findings, in most cases mild, were detected in 28%. Serum creatinine exceeded 200 mumol/l in 4% of the controls, and dialysis therapy was given to 2% of the controls. Probable or definitive renal amyloidosis was diagnosed in 4% of this group. With regards to the development or progression of chronic renal failure, the long-term clinical prognosis of isolated hematuria and isolated CRF was found to be favorable. Proteinuria alone or combined with hematuria or CRF was related to evidently poorer prognosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.