Supracondylar humeral fractures account for 60% of elbow fractures in childhood, with cubitus varus being its most common complication. It can be avoided by accurate assessment of distal humeral alignment after fracture reduction, and the Baumann angle is the usual measurement for this purpose. However, several reports demonstrate an inconsistency of this angle, and our hypothesis is that reliability could be improved with angles drawn between the trochlear physeal line and the humeral longitudinal axis. The aim of the study was to compare intra- and interobserver reliability between the Baumann angle and angles drawn between the trochlear physeal line and (1) humeral longitudinal axis (X-angle), (2) humeral lateral cortex line (Y-angle), (3) humeral medial cortex line (Z-angle). Angle measurements were performed on 141 distal humerus’ radiographs of children aged 3–10 years by five observers in a tertiary hospital. The measurements were compared for their intra- and interobserver agreement. All measurements showed good or excellent intraobserver agreement levels, with the highest for Z-angle [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.906] and the lowest for Baumann angle. There were also excellent interobserver agreement levels for all angles, the highest for Z-angle (ICC = 0.885). There are indications that Z-angle had higher agreement levels when compared to the others (ICC = 0.954; 0.936–0.969) in the group aged 7–10 years. The angle drawn between the humeral medial cortex and trochlear physeal line showed greater agreement than the other angles analysed, becoming a potentially useful tool for evaluation of children with supracondylar humeral fractures in daily practice.
Purpose of reviewThis study aimed to review the established concepts and advances related to growth modulation for treating knee angular deformities. Although they are considered well tolerated procedures, careful indications and accurate techniques are necessary to ensure good results.Recent findingsIn addition to general clinical and radiographic evaluations, new tools such as two-dimensional low-dose radiography and gait analysis have been used to clarify angular and torsional combinations and the impact of mild angulations on the knee joint. Temporary epiphysiodesis is commonly the choice, and it can be performed with different implants such as staples, tension band plates (TBP), percutaneous transphyseal screws (PETS), sutures, and screws.SummaryConsidering its principles, TBP has been preferred for younger children. Cost can be a limitation, and research for alternative implants such as screws and nonabsorbable sutures indicate they might be an alternative in the future. In adolescents, PETS becomes an attractive alternative; however, its reversible character has been controversial, and further studies are needed to establish limits in younger patients.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the importance of pelvic fractures in childhood by analyzing epidemiological characteristics and associated injuries.Methods: This is a retrospective study performed between 2002 and 2012 at two trauma referral centers in São Paulo. We identified 25 patients aged 16 years old or younger with pelvic fracture.Results: The main mechanism of trauma was traffic accident (80%), followed by fall from height (16%). At hospital admission, 92% had traumatic brain injury and 40% had hemodynamic instability. Besides pelvic fractures, 56% of the children had other associated injuries (genitourinary, abdominal, vascular, chest and neurological), and 79% of them required operative treatment. According to the Torode and Zieg classification, the majority of cases were types III and IV. Seventy-two percent of all pelvic fractures were treated by surgery; 52% involved external fixation and 20% involved open reduction and internal fixation.Conclusions: The pelvic fractures in childhood can be considered a marker for injury severity, because the associated injuries usually are severe, needing operative treatment and leading to a high mortality rate (12%). Level of Evidence IV, Case Series.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.