del MEC, referencia HUM2004-02313/HIST, titulado Saber y poder en la Castilla medieval (siglos XIV-XV): cultura y carreras profesionales entre el clero de las catedrales. Agradecemos a D. Matías Vicario, canónigo archivero, y a su equipo de archiveras, la amabilidad y diligencia con la que nos han facilitado el acceso a los fondos documentales del Archivo Catedralicio de Burgos.
1 Esta investigación se ha realizado en el marco del proyecto de I+D, HAR2013-41179-P, MINECO, titulado: Cultura, poder y redes sociales en la Castilla medieval: el clero diocesano y catedralicio de Burgos en la Baja Edad Media.Abreviaturas utilizadas: ACB = Archivo de la Catedral de Burgos; Lib. = Libro; marav. = maravedíes; Reg. = Registro; SH= Synodicon Hispanum; vol. = volumen.Resumen: El presente artículo estudia la relación entre la intensa reglamentación sobre las conductas y actos, establecida por el cabildo catedralicio y los obispos de Burgos, y su refl ejo en la práctica penal durante el siglo XV. Para ello se analizan las penas que fueron aplicadas a 282 casos de delitos y faltas extraídos de las actas capitulares burgalesas. Primeramente, se establece una tipología de los delitos y las faltas de clérigos y laicos documentados, así como la terminología empleada por la fuente para defi nirlos. Seguidamente, se clasifi can las penas aplicadas a los diferentes delitos y faltas, teniendo en cuenta su frecuencia y variabilidad. Finalmente, se analiza el grado de implicación de clé-rigos y laicos en los delitos penalizados. Todo ello tiene como objetivo fi nal determinar si puede hablarse de la existencia de un cierto desfase entre la norma y su aplicación.
Abstract:The present article studies the relationship between the extensive regulation regarding behavior and acts, adopted by the Bishops and the Cathedral Chapter of Burgos, and its refl ection on the justice system of penance during the Fifteenth century. To this end, 282 cases of offenses and crimes, obtained from the Cathedral Chapter Acts of Burgos, are analysed. Firstly, a typology of the registered offenses and crimes is established, along with the terminology which is used in the sources to defi ne them. Secondly, the punishments applied to the different wrong doigs are classifi ed according to their frequency and variability, and also to their relationship with the cathedral statutes and the rules of the synods. Finally, the degree of involvement that clergy and laity had in the prosecuted crimes is examined. All of this aims at determining whether or not there is a discrepancy between the norm and its implementation.
This paper studies the differences between the Crowns of Castile and Aragon in the relationship between monarchy and universities in the Late Middle Ages. In the case of the first Castilian universities, it nuances the excessive importance that historiography has granted to the monarchs in their foundation and instead stresses that the initiative came from bishops and cathedral chapters before being seconded by royalty. It also describes the changes in the royal intervention in university funding and protection. As regards the Crown of Aragon, it emphasises the role of the urban oligarchy in the municipal corporations in the creation of the universities, together with the king and the bishops. This was the reason for the importance of municipal funding despite the initial opposition in the 13th century to an institution with its own jurisdiction that was outside its control.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.