The TDC on the foot was significantly higher compared with ankle and lower leg values. Foot measurements should be interpreted cautiously because of questionable interobserver agreement. The interobserver agreement was high on lower leg and ankle measurements. Neither age, BMI, hair removal nor moisturizer use had any significant on effect on the lower leg TDC. TDC values of 35.2 for the ankle and 38.3 for the lower leg are suggested as upper normal reference limits in women.

Wounds and chronic oedema are common disorders, but rarely studied together. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the point-prevalence and risk factors of wounds on the leg, in chronic leg oedema. Forty sites in nine countries were included. Of 7077 patients with chronic leg oedema, 12.70% had wounds. Independent risk factors were: peripheral arterial disease (odds ratio (OR) 4.87, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 3.63-6.52), cellulitis within the past 12 months (OR 2.69, 95% CI 2.25-3.21), secondary lymphoedema (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.93-3.60), being male (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.78-2.44), being over 85 years of age (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.23-2.62), underweight (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.14-2.79), bed bound (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.01-3.16), chair bound (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.18-1.97), diabetes (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.23-1.77), and walking with aid (OR 1Á41, 95% CI 1.17-1.69). 43.22% of those with wounds had clinically defined well-controlled oedema, associated with a significantly lower risk of wounds (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.42-0.58, P < .001). Hard/fibrotic tissue (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.19-2.48), and a positive Stemmers sign (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.05-2.35) were associated with wounds. The study reinforces the importance of measures to control oedema, as controlled swelling was associated with a 50% lower risk of wounds.chronic oedema, leg ulcers, LIMPRINT, lymphoedema, wounds and injuries Key Messages• chronic leg oedema (oedema >3 months ) and wounds are frequent conditions, but have rarely been studied together. Little is known about mechanisms linking wounds and oedematous limbs

There were no external sources of funding for this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare with regard to the manuscript or its content.

Background: The swelling of the extremities seen in lymphedema can be measured with many different volumetric devices; however, many methods lack important characteristics including reproducibility and independence from the subjectivity and skill of the operator. The aim of this study was to validate the use of the Perometer Ò as a possible standard for volumetric measurement methods based on the inter-observer and intraobserver variability when using a standard method of Perometry Ò. Methods and Results: Volumetric measurements were performed on 10 healthy test subjects by 5 individuals (the observers) who had been instructed in the measurement techniques to be used. The inter-observer variability was assessed by having the five observers measure all the test subjects both in the morning and in the early afternoon. The intra-observer variability was examined by having each observer measure all the 10 test subjects 4 times in a row in the aforementioned time frames. A data set was created using the measurements, allowing for the assessment of other parameters including variation of volume between the right and left leg and daily variation in swelling. Statistical measurements were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), from which it was determined that there was no statistically significant inter-observer (p-value 0.997) and intra-observer variation (p-value 0.995) based on a significance level of >5%. Furthermore, it was observed that a statistically significant difference in volume occurred in the leg volume during the day. Conclusion: It was concluded that the use of the Perometer provides consistent measurements of volume independent of the observer and therefore appears to provide a candidate standard for volumetric measurements.

The powder-free, non-sterile gloves were useful in a wound healing department. The Skinsense Biogel glove showed more advantageous features, less changes for the worse in the skin condition, and was better packed in the containers.