A comparative analysis of the genomes of Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae-and the proteins they are predicted to encode-was undertaken in the context of cellular, developmental, and evolutionary processes. The nonredundant protein sets of flies and worms are similar in size and are only twice that of yeast, but different gene families are expanded in each genome, and the multidomain proteins and signaling pathways of the fly and worm are far more complex than those of yeast. The fly has orthologs to 177 of the 289 human disease genes examined and provides the foundation for rapid analysis of some of the basic processes involved in human disease.

No abstract

Previous studies have established that the regulation of gene expression is dependent upon the nucleosomal integrity of nuclear DNA. To a large extent, this integrity is dictated by the acetylation status of the core histone particles. The acetylation of histones is, in turn, controlled by the combined activity of specific acetylases and deacetylases. Moreover, disruption of histone acetylases and deacetylases has been linked to a wide variety of human cancers. For this reason, the recent availability of potent and specific histone deacetylase inhibitors has provoked a great deal of interest amongst cancer biologists, oncologists and pharmacologists. Within the past 2- 3 years, several novel histone deacetylase inhibitors have been reported, many of which have already been tested in vivo in mouse models of cancer. In this review we focus on the rationale behind the use of histone deacetylase inhibitors as anticancer agents. Moreover, we review some of the recent findings pertaining to the use of these compounds as anticancer agents.

E2F and DP family members are established regulators of the cell cycle. In this study, we examined their activity/expression during keratinocyte growth arrest. Treating human epidermal keratinocytes with the growth inhibitors TPA or IFN-gamma or allowing the cells to reach confluence resulted in 90% inhibition of DNA synthesis, whereas a keratinocyte-derived squamous carcinoma cell line (SCC25) was resistant to growth inhibitors. Gel shift analysis of keratinocytes using an E2F response element indicated that growth arrest was associated with a decrease in all E2F binding complexes. This indicates that growth inhibition is not due to negative regulation by pocket proteins. Conversely, gel shift analysis of growth inhibitor-resistant SCC25 cells showed no decrease in E2F binding. If deregulated E2F expression/activity is involved in tumor development, then the deliberate deregulation of E2F activity may make keratinocytes resistant to growth inhibitors in much the same way as the SCC cells. The HPV16 E7 protein is known to activate E2F. Retroviral infection of keratinocytes with E7-expressing constructs resulted in growth inhibitor resistance, whereas infection with E6 constructs did not. E2F is a heterodimeric complex consisting of E2F family members (1-5) and DP proteins (1-3). Examination of the expression levels for E2F genes and other genes associated with the cell cycle indicated that E2F1 was profoundly decreased in growth-arrested keratinocytes (90%), whereas E2F3, E2F5, and DP1 were not. E2F2 and E2F4 were increased in IFN-gamma-treated keratinocytes but not in TPA-treated or confluent keratinocytes. In contrast, SCC25 cells did not undergo growth arrest and did not downregulate E2F1 mRNA expression in response to growth inhibitors. Our results indicate that E2F DNA binding and in particular E2F1 mRNA expression are associated with keratinocyte proliferation. Our results with the SCC25 cells and the E7-infected cells are consistent with the proposition that deregulated E2F expression/activity (in particular E2F1) may be involved in the unregulated proliferation of skin tumor cells.

The high-activity homozygotes showed significantly higher scores of aggression, whereas the heterozygotes showed significantly lower scores. The odds ratio for aggression for the high-activity homozygotes was 2.07 (95% Cl=1.03-4.15), whereas that for the heterozygotes was 0.54 (95% Cl=0.30-1.00). CONCLUSIONS; The high-activity COMT homozygote confers a higher risk of recorded aggression in schizophrenia. Heterozygotes had a significantly lower risk, which may represent an example of heterosis/heterozygote advantage.

No abstract

Some studies have reported associations between COMT and MAO genotypes and aggression, though results have been inconsistent. We examined the relationship between Overt aggression scale (OAS) scores, and both MAOA and MAOB polymorphisms in a well-powered sample of 346 subjects with schizophrenia. We also examined COMT in a Stage II replication sample of 150 individuals, and combined these results with our previously reported (Stage I) findings for COMT. We found no evidence of any associations between OAS ratings and any of the polymorphisms investigated under different genetic models. There was no evidence of epistatic interaction between MAOA and COMT on OAS scores. These results fail to support the theory that functional polymorphisms within the MAOA, MAOB, or COMT genes, as determinants of catecholamine enzymatic activity, are risk factors for aggressive behavior.

No abstract