Second-life batteries are defined as those removed from electric vehicles (EVs) when their energy density and power density has degraded below the level required for motive applications but are still performant enough for less demanding stationary applications. They could one day be a plentiful, environmentally benign source of low-cost energy storage. Their price evolution is important to know for designers of and investors in such systems. A methodology is developed for predicting second-life battery price and sales quantities up to 2050. Although existing data is too scant to draw reliable quantitative conclusions, sensitivity analyses are run to investigate the effects of different EV uptake scenarios, new battery costs, refurbishment costs, recycling net credit, elasticity of supply, and size of demand. No previous work has incorporated all these driving factors in such a transparent way. The second-life price is found to be insensitive to most of these factors, while the quantity sold is sensitive to nearly all of them. Much work remains to be done in parameterizing the model more accurately. However, this work already elucidates a novel quantitative mode of thinking about what factors influence the long-term price and market size of second-life batteries.
Domestic PV-battery systems are rarely operated in a way which specifically maximizes environmental benefit. Consequently the studies that seriously examine such systems often find that the greenhouse gas and pollutant emissions savings of rooftop PV, though still positive, are lessened by adding a domestic battery. This study shows thatby simulating a PV-battery system with a range of sizes that this need not be inevitable. A novel algorithm was designed specifically to perform 'emissions arbitrage': to charge the battery when the grid emissions intensity is low and to discharge when it is high. It was found that the CO 2 saved relative to the same system with PV only can more than pay back the CO 2 debt of manufacturing the battery. This is true as long as the UK moves away from the present-day situation where natural gas-fired generators are nearly always the marginal generator. This work underlines the importance of both the operating strategy and the interactions between the system and the entire grid, in order to maximize the environmental benefit achievable with domestic PV-battery systems.In contrast, Faria et al. (2014) [18] showed that a second-life electric vehicle battery could reduce global warming, abiotic depletion, acidification and eutrophication factors by 2% when used in a peak-shaving application in France, and 4-5% in a load-shifting application (both without PV). This is because the French grid emissions intensities change throughout the day in such a way that electricity is imported from the grid when emissions are low and exported to the grid when they are high. This 'emissions arbitrage' effect was not accounted for in the other papers mentioned, which assumed a constant grid emissions intensity.A flaw in the work of Faria et al. (2014) [18] is that they used average rather than marginal emissions intensities. If some grid-generated electricity is displaced by the injection of PV power, or indeed any other intervention, not all the generator types (nuclear, coal, biomass, etc.) would have their output reduced in the same proportion as their total generation. The reduction would occur mostly for the generator type with the highest running cost. This gives rise to the concept of marginal emissions factor (MEF, as opposed to average emissions factor, AEF). Studies have shown that using AEF rather than MEF can cause errors of up to 25% [19][20][21][22].It should also be noted that the battery operating strategies studied by Faria et al. (2014) were not designed to achieve emissions arbitrage. As such, environmental impacts were negative when those operating strategies were applied to Portugal and Poland [18]. The literature is abundant with algorithms for peak reduction, cost minimization and self-sufficiency maximization [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. There is good reason for this: All these objectives are quantifiable and desired by consumers, distribution network operators, or other relevant stakeholders. However, environmental benefit is also desirable, as evidenced by survey data on opini...
This paper proposes a methodology to assess the impact of alternative electricity generation and energy storage scenarios for meeting electricity demand on a national level. The method combines real and synthetic electricity generation and demand data to investigate different decarbonization strategies using solar and wind generation and electrical energy storage. This method is applied to provide relevant case studies for two geographically similar electricity systems in New Zealand and Great Britain. Newly available solar and wind data sets at hourly resolution are used within this method for these systems to assess the potential contribution of these technologies and as such, to refresh understanding of the impact of these technologies on decarbonization strategies against historical and future demand patterns. Although wind, solar and storage technologies are found to reduce the carbon emissions in both electricity systems, a key result is quantifying the impact this has on traditional generation as a backup resource. In New Zealand an investment in wind and solar equivalent to less than 15% of the wind/solar capacity in Great Britain is found to (i) reduce fossil fuel use to less than 2% of annual electricity generation requirements in the data assessed and (ii) remove the need for continuous operation of fossil fuel plants. Further, it is shown that existing hydro storage potential could be used to create near complete decarbonization of New Zealand electricity
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.