A new p56lck tyrosine kinase inhibitor WIN 61651 [1,4-dihydro-7-(4-methyl-1-piperizinyl)-1-(4-(4-methyl-1-piperi zinyl))phenyl- 4-oxo-3-quinolinecarboxamide) is described. WIN 61651, which is competitive with ATP, demonstrates selectivity for the lymphoid restricted tyrosine kinase p56lck over serine/threonine kinases, such as protein kinase C and protein kinase A, and over some other tyrosine kinases, including erbB2, epidermal growth factor receptor, and insulin receptor; however, it is equipotent for inhibition of p56lck and the platelet derived growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases. WIN 61651 inhibits p56lck activity in cell-free assays, tyrosine kinase activity in a T lymphocytic cell line, and T cell activation, as measured by IL-2 production by purified CD4 positive peripheral blood T lymphocytes and the mixed lymphocyte reaction. WIN 61651 constitutes a new tool for studies on the role for tyrosine kinases in lymphocyte function.
The effects of the steroidal androgen receptor antagonist zanoterone (WIN 49596) and the steroidal 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor finasteride (MK-906) either alone or in combination on prostatic size, histomorphology, and biochemistry were determined in the intact male dog. Additionally, the effects of treatment with zanoterone and/or finasteride on testicular size, serum testosterone and LH levels, and spermatogenesis were determined in the same dogs. Daily oral treatment for 16 weeks with either zanoterone alone at 10 mg/kg.day or finasteride alone at 1.0 mg/kg.day reduced (P < 0.05) the size of the prostate, resulted in mild to moderate diffuse glandular atrophy of the prostate, and decreased prostatic DNA and prostatic arginine esterase (the primary canine prostatic protein) levels compared to those in intact controls. These changes occurred with no effect on testicular weight, testicular histomorphology, daily sperm production, or serum LH levels. Serum testosterone concentrations were increased (P < 0.05) approximately 3-fold in the 10 mg/kg.day zanoterone treatment group compared to those in intact controls. Combination treatment of male dogs for 16 weeks with zanoterone (10 mg/kg.day) plus finasteride (1.0 mg/kg.day) orally also reduced (P < 0.05) prostate size, resulted in moderate to marked diffuse prostatic glandular atrophy, and decreased prostatic DNA and arginine esterase levels more than either drug alone, without affecting testicular size, testicular histomorphology, serum LH concentrations, or serum testosterone concentrations compared to those in intact controls. The effects of combination treatment with zanoterone and finasteride on prostatic size; histomorphology; and DNA, arginine esterase protein, and arginine esterase mRNA levels were similar to those observed in castrate controls. In addition, in situ estimates of prostatic size using transrectal ultrasonography indicated that the median time to 70% prostatic regression in dogs administered combination zanoterone plus finasteride was similar to that in castrate controls (9.6 and 9.3 weeks, respectively), indicating that the combination was more effective in causing prostatic regression than either drug alone. Finally, at the dosages used, no adverse effects of combination treatment with zanoterone plus finasteride on testicular or other major body organ weights were observed. Based on these results, combination therapy using zanoterone and finasteride for the treatment of human androgen-dependent disorders such as benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer has potential utility.
We have found that in female rats a variety of stressful stimuli, including sc inflammation, skin incision, endotoxin injection, and cold exposure, cause a significant decrease (30-86%) in the capacity of the hepatic cell membranes to specifically bind [125I]ovine PRL. Stress-induced decrease in food intake was not a factor in these studies, as nourishment was given only by tube feeding. Neither sc inflammation nor cold exposure affected hepatic binding of [125I]insulin. Further, the induction of inflammation in lactating rats and rats bearing 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced mammary carcinomas did not affect the binding of PRL by the lactating or malignant mammary tissue. The suppressive effect of inflammation on hepatic binding of PRL was demonstrable in adrenalectomized-ovariectomized rats, in hypophysectomized rats receiving hormone replacement, and in adrenalectomized rats that had undergone partial chemical sympathectomy. We conclude that sc inflammation, as well as other forms of stress, decreases hepatic binding of PRL, but does not affect hepatic binding of insulin or mammary binding of PRL. The decrease in hepatic PRL binding is not mediated by a hormone secreted by the adrenals, ovaries, or pituitary, or by catecholamines, but could be mediated by another plasma factor or by peripheral dopaminergic neurons. Stress-induced decrease in hepatic PRL binding, or a related decrease in the binding of other polypeptide hormones, could play a role in the physiological response to stress.
Previous experimental observations have suggested to us that PRL and GH may be involved in regulating the metabolism of carnitine, a factor that plays a critically important role in fatty acid oxidation and ketogenesis. In the present study we administered bovine PRL (bPRL) or bovine GH (bGH) at a physiologic rate to hypophysectomized female rats for 2-3 days, and observed that bPRL caused a small (16%) increase (P less than 0.01), and bGH a 36% increase (P less than 0.01), in hepatic carnitine, bPRL decreased serum carnitine by 24% (P less than 0.05), and bPRL and bGH each increased the liver/serum carnitine ratio by 58% (P less than 0.01), suggesting that these hormones enhance the active uptake of carnitine from plasma. bPRL and bGH, alone or in combination, did not affect the carnitine content of cardiac or skeletal muscle, but in combination they increased the heart/serum and muscle/serum carnitine ratios by 45-76% (P less than 0.01), thus allowing maintenance of normal cardiac and skeletal muscle carnitine despite a decreased plasma level. In hypophysectomized male rats, bPRL did not affect liver or epididymal carnitine. We hypothesize that PRL and GH may play a role in the regulation of the carnitine concentration of female liver by enhancing hepatic uptake of carnitine from plasma, and through this mechanism may affect hepatic fatty acid oxidation and ketogenesis. The effect of lactogenic and somatogenic hormones on hepatic carnitine and ketogenesis could be of particular physiological importance in late pregnancy and during lactation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.