In conclusion, this study suggests that 20% azelaic acid cream applied twice daily may be more effective than hydroquinone 4% in reducing mild melasma. However, because this was an open trial, it is suggested that further studies involving large groups of patients be conducted to achieve a more conclusive result.
Alopecia areata is an autoimmune disease resulting in partial or total nonscarring hair loss and the treatment of severe alopecia areata is difficult. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of azathioprine as a systemic monotherapy for moderate to severe alopecia areata. A total of 20 patients [14 men (70%) and six women (30%)] with minimum 6 months history of alopecia areata were included. The extent of scalp hair regrowth during and after the completion of the 6 months treatment was evaluated by the Severity of Alopecia Tool (the SALT score). The daily drug intake was calculated as 2 mg/kg of body weight. Mean duration of current episode of scalp hair loss was 26.4 (26.4 ± 17) months. Mean regrowth percentage was 52.3% (52.3 ± 38.4). Mean hair loss percentage before treatment was 72.7% (72.7 ± 28.3) compared with 33.5% (33.5 ± 30.7) after 6 months of azathioprine treatment. This showed a highly significant statistical difference (Paired t-test, CI 95% =21.5-54.1). Mean hair loss score (S(0) -S(5) ) before treatment was 3.9 (3.9 ± 1.6) and after 6 months of azathioprine treatment was 1.8 (1.8 ± 1.3). Assessment showed significant difference from baseline score (sign test, P < 0.0001). No significant statistical difference was observed with respect to gender before and after azathioprine treatment. Treatment with azathioprine as a systemic monotherapy clinically produces relevant improvement in moderate-to-severe alopecia areata. Generally azathioprine is a low-cost and well-tolerated drug and with controlled studies on larger number of patients, long-term efficacy and safety of this treatment should be investigated.
Summary
L‐Cysteamine is a biological antioxidant produced during the coenzyme A metabolism cycle and is naturally present in all mammalian cells. The efficacy of topical cysteamine for the treatment of melasma has been recently shown in two double‐blind, randomized, and placebo‐controlled clinical trials. Herein, we report a 44‐year‐old patient with melasma resistant to Kligman's formula (Pigmanorm cream), who was successfully treated with topical cysteamine as a new depigmenting agent. Skin colorimetric measurements, MASI score determination, and standard photographies after 2 and 4 months of once daily application of cysteamine cream showed a marked improvement of the hyperpigmented lesions. Telangiectasia and perilesional hypopigmentation improved rapidly after the discontinuation of Kligman's formula and starting the treatment with topical cysteamine. After 4 months, the therapeutic results were maintained through a biweekly application regimen of cysteamine cream. The use of cysteamine cream was well tolerated and did not induce any side effects during the 3‐year follow‐up of the patient. Cysteamine is a natural molecule with an excellent safety profile and known antimutagenic, antimelanoma, and anticarcinogenic effects. Considering the high efficacy of cysteamine cream, it is possible that it could replace mutagenic and carcinogenic depigmenting agents such as hydroquinone in near future.
Background: Melasma is a difficult to treat pigmentation disorder. However, some successes have been attained by microneedling. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of microneedling using meso-depigmentation solution (mesoneedling) in comparison with standard microneedling, over a 4-month treatment period.Methods: As a part of this pilot study, 20 patients received microneedling on one side and mesoneedling on another side of their face. Treatment was repeated on a monthly basis for 4 months. Treatment efficacy was defined through Dermacatch ® colorimetry, modified Melasma Area and Severity (mMASI) score determination, Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), and patient questionnaires, whereby all assessments were conducted at the baseline, as well after 2 and 4 months of treatment.Results: Before treatments, mean difference between pigmented and normal skin calculated by Dermacatch ® was 43.7 ± 20.12 and 44.6 ± 20.72 in microneedling sides and mesoneedling sides, respectively. After two and four sessions, these values declined to 34.5 ± 16.26 and 28.05 ± 13.79 on the side subjected to microneedling, while 29.75 ± 15.07 and 20.45 ± 10.58 were measured on the mesoneedling side. Statistically significant differences have been observed between microneedling and mesoneedling treatments at both time points (P = .0001, P = .0001). The mMASI scores obtained upon treatment completion were significantly lower on both the microneedling and the mesoneedling side. The IGA and patients' self-assessment scores further confirmed that both treatments were effective in treating melasma, without producing any notable side-effects or complications.
Conclusion:In sum, both microneedling and mesoneedling are effective in decreasing melanin content in the epidermal melasma lesions.
In this case series, ten patients with plaque-type psoriasis were treated with Hypericum perforatum ointment. The hypericum ointment was applied to one side of each patient's body and the vehicle to the opposite side twice daily for 4 weeks in a single blinded manner. Modified psoriasis area severity index (PASI) scores were significantly lowered where the formulated ointment had been applied. In determining PASI scores, three factors, erythema, scaling and thickness, were evaluated; all were significantly lower where the formulated ointment had been applied (P = 0.01, P = 0.004, P = 0.04). Hypericum perforatum ointment applied twice daily may be effective in reducing PASI scores in mild plaque-type psoriasis, however, further larger studies need be conducted to achieve a more conclusive result.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.