No abstract

This review provides a compilation of the methods used to study real-time (37 degrees C) drug release from parenteral microparticulate drug delivery systems administered via the subcutaneous or intramuscular route. Current methods fall into three broad categories, viz., sample and separate, flow-through cell, and dialysis techniques. The principle of the specific method employed along with the advantages and disadvantages are described. With the "sample and separate" technique, drug-loaded microparticles are introduced into a vessel, and release is monitored over time by analysis of supernatant or drug remaining in the microspheres. In the "flow-through cell" technique, media is continuously circulated through a column containing drug-loaded microparticles followed by analysis of the eluent. The "dialysis" method achieves a physical separation of the drug-loaded microparticles from the release media by use of a membrane, which allows for sampling without interference of the microspheres. With all these methods, the setup and sampling techniques seem to influence in vitro release; the results are discussed in detail, and criteria to aid in selection of a method are stated. Attempts to establish in vitro-in vivo correlation for these injectable dosage forms are also discussed. It would be prudent to have an in vitro test method for microparticles that satisfies compendial and regulatory requirements, is user friendly, robust, and reproducible, and can be used for quality-control purposes at real-time and elevated temperatures.

This review summarizes the methods used to study real-time (37 ∘ C) drug release from nanoparticulate drug delivery systems and establish an IVIVC. Since no compendial standards exist, drug release is currently assessed using a variety of methods including sample and separate (SS), continuous flow (CF), dialysis membrane (DM) methods, and a combination thereof, as well as novel techniques like voltametry and turbidimetry. This review describes the principle of each method along with their advantages and disadvantages, including challenges with set-up and sampling. The SS method allows direct measurement of drug release with simple set-up requirements, but sampling is cumbersome. With the CF method, sampling is straightforward but the set-up is time consuming. Set-up as well as sampling is easier with the DM, but it may not be suitable for drugs that bind to the membrane. Novel methods offer the possibility of real-time drug release measurement but may be restricted to certain types of drugs. Of these methods, Level A IVIVCs have been obtained with dialysis, alone or in combination with the sample and separate technique. Future efforts should focus on developing mathematical models that describe drug release mechanisms as well as facilitate formulation development of nano-sized dosage forms.

In humans, the incidence and severity of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are greater in males than in females. Chronic infusion of angiotensin II (AngII) into apolipoprotein E-deficient (apoE(-/-)) mice promotes atherosclerosis and causes the formation of AAAs. Just as human males are more susceptible to developing AAAs, male mice are more susceptible to AngII-induced AAAs. We hypothesized that sex steroid hormones mediate gender differences in AngII-induced AAA through regulation of the renin-angiotensin system. To define the role of ovarian hormones, female apoE(-/-) mice were subjected to ovariectomy or sham operation and infused with AngII (1000 ng/kg x min) for 28 d. Ovariectomy had no effect on AngII-induced atherosclerosis, nor did it influence the incidence or severity of AAA. To define the role of testicular hormones, male apoE(-/-) mice were subjected to orchidectomy (orx) or sham operation and infused with AngII (1000 ng/kg x min) for 28 d. Orx resulted in a profound reduction in AAA incidence (85% vs. 18%, sham vs. orx; P = 0.003) to the level observed in females (25%). However, orx had no effect on AngII-induced reductions in plasma renin concentration or spleen AngII receptor density. In contrast, orx resulted in an increase in atherosclerosis (0.46 +/- 0.07 vs. 1.20 +/- 0.21 mm(2), sham vs. orx; P = 0.002). These results suggest that estrogen does not mediate gender differences in AngII-induced AAA. In contrast, androgens mediate a higher incidence of AngII- induced AAA, through mechanisms that do not appear to involve circulating renin or angiotensin receptor density.