Background and aimsbackground
Currently there is limited knowledge on cancer and COVID-19; we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of cancer on serious events including ICU admission rate and mortality in COVID 19.
Methods
PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials were searched on April 16, 2020, to extract published articles that reported the outcomes of cancer in COVID-19 patients. The search terms were “coronavirus” and “clinical characteristics” with no language or time restrictions. We identified 512 published results and 13 studies were included in the analysis.
Results
There were 3775 patients, of whom 63 (1·66%) had a cancer. The pooled estimates of ICU admission in COVID 19 patients with and without cancer were 40% versus 8·42%.The odds ratio of ICU admission rates between the cancer and non-cancer groups was 2.88 with a 95% CI of 1·18 to 7·01 (p = 0·026). The pooled estimates of death rate in COVID -19 patients with and without cancer were 20·83% versus 7·82%. The odds ratio of death rates between the cancer and non-cancer groups was 2.25 with a 95% CI ranging from 0·71 to 7·10 with p value of 0·166. The pooled prevalence of cancer patients was 2% (95 CI 1–4).
Conclusions
Presence of cancer in COVID-19 leads to higher risk of developing serious events i.e. ICU admission, mechanical ventilation and mortality. The presence of cancer has a significant impact on mortality rate in COVID-19 patients.
Objective: To evaluate the role of logarithmic ODDS (LODDS) in the number of positive lymph nodes and the number of negative lymph nodes as a prognostic metric in the squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) penis.Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from 96 cases of SCC penis that underwent bilateral groin dissection between 2010 and 2015 at our institute.Lymph node density (LND) and LODDS were calculated for all the patients and classified according to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pN staging.Thresholds for LND (24% and 46%) and LODDS (−0.75 and 0) were established.Multivariate analysis of various cofactors was done with overall survival (OS) as a dependent factor. Three classification systems were compared using receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.Results: Univariate analysis showed that AJCC pN, LND, and LODDS were all significantly correlated with OS. However, only LODDS (HR, 11.185; p = .023) remained an independent prognostic factor through multivariate analysis. LODDS (log-likelihood = 3832 vs. 3798; p < .001) had better prognostic performance than pN and better discriminatory ability than LND (AIC = 3902 vs. 3928). LODDS had better power of discrimination than LND and pN. LODDS could predict survival in lymph node yield (LNY) < 15 (p < .001).
Conclusion:LODDS is an independent predictor of OS in the SCC penis and has superior prognostic significance than the AJCC pN and LND classification systems.
Objective/Hypothesis: With non-surgical treatment, T4b oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) have an unacceptably poor prognosis. A subset of patients if selected wisely for surgery, can have significantly improved survival. The present study aims to explore the feasibility of radical resection and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in the T4b OSCC and their impact on survival, along with the factors affecting it.Study Design: This is a retrospective analysis of 302 consecutive patients with T4b OSCC presented at our institute between July 2015 and January 2016.Methods: Three different treatment protocols were decided depending on the extent of the disease-upfront resection, NACT (followed by surgery or chemo/radiation depending on the response), or upfront non-surgical treatment (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy).Results: Upfront surgery was done in 67 (22.19%) patients and 155 (51.32%) patients received NACT. The rest of the patients received upfront non-surgical treatment. The overall response rate of NACT was 23.23% and the resectability rate was 36.13%. The median OS for the whole population was 12 months (30 months for the surgical group and 9 months for the non-surgical group). There was no survival difference between supra versus infra-notch tumors (P value = .552) or post-NACT versus upfront surgery (P value = .932). Nodal involvement was the most important poor prognostic factor affecting both DFS (P = .006) and OS (P = .002).Conclusions: With proper patient selection after thorough clinico-radiological assessment, a subset of T4b OSCC can be operated with curative intention; either upfront or after downstaging with NACT, which ultimately translates into improved survival.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.