Recently, deep learning has been employed in medical image analysis for several clinical imaging methods, such as X-ray, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and pathological tissue imaging, and excellent performance has been reported. With the development of these methods, deep learning technologies have rapidly evolved in the healthcare industry related to hair loss. Hair density measurement (HDM) is a process used for detecting the severity of hair loss by counting the number of hairs present in the occipital donor region for transplantation. HDM is a typical object detection and classification problem that could benefit from deep learning. This study analyzed the accuracy of HDM by applying deep learning technology for object detection and reports the feasibility of automating HDM. The dataset for training and evaluation comprised 4492 enlarged hair scalp RGB images obtained from male hair-loss patients and the corresponding annotation data that contained the location information of the hair follicles present in the image and follicle-type information according to the number of hairs. EfficientDet, YOLOv4, and DetectoRS were used as object detection algorithms for performance comparison. The experimental results indicated that YOLOv4 had the best performance, with a mean average precision of 58.67.

No abstract

Recent advances in deep learning technology, and the availability of public shadow image datasets, have enabled significant performance improvements of shadow removal tasks in computer vision. However, most deep learning-based shadow removal methods are usually trained in a supervised manner, in which paired shadow and shadow-free data are required. We developed a weakly supervised generative adversarial network with a cycle-in-cycle structure for shadow removal using unpaired data. In addition, we introduced new loss functions to reduce unnecessary transformations for non-shadow areas and to enable smooth transformations for shadow boundary areas. We conducted extensive experiments using the ISTD and Video Shadow Removal datasets to assess the effectiveness of our methods. The experimental results show that our method is superior to other state-of-the-art methods trained on unpaired data.