Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been a subject of intense scrutiny as it facilitates metastasis and alters drug sensitivity. Although EMT-regulatory roles for numerous miRNAs and transcription factors are known, their functions can be difficult to disentangle, in part due to the difficulty in identifying direct miRNA targets from complex datasets and in deciding how to incorporate ‘indirect’ miRNA effects that may, or may not, represent biologically relevant information. To better understand how miRNAs exert effects throughout the transcriptome during EMT, we employed Exon–Intron Split Analysis (EISA), a bioinformatic technique that separates transcriptional and post-transcriptional effects through the separate analysis of RNA-Seq reads mapping to exons and introns. We find that in response to the manipulation of miRNAs, a major effect on gene expression is transcriptional. We also find extensive co-ordination of transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms during both EMT and mesenchymal to epithelial transition (MET) in response to TGF-β or miR-200c respectively. The prominent transcriptional influence of miRNAs was also observed in other datasets where miRNA levels were perturbed. This work cautions against a narrow approach that is limited to the analysis of direct targets, and demonstrates the utility of EISA to examine complex regulatory networks involving both transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms.
The dynamic transition between epithelial-like and mesenchymal-like cell states has been a focus for extensive investigation for decades, reflective of the importance of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) through development, in the adult, and the contributing role EMT has to pathologies including metastasis and fibrosis. Not surprisingly, regulation of the complex genetic networks that underlie EMT have been attributed to multiple transcription factors and microRNAs. What is surprising, however, are the sheer number of different regulators (hundreds of transcription factors and microRNAs) for which critical roles have been described. This review seeks not to collate these studies, but to provide a perspective on the fundamental question of whether it is really feasible that so many regulators play important roles and if so, what does this tell us about EMT and more generally, the genetic machinery that controls complex biological processes.
MiRNAs post-transcriptionally repress gene expression by binding to mRNA 3′UTRs, but the extent to which they act through protein coding regions (CDS regions) is less well established. MiRNA interaction studies show a substantial proportion of binding occurs in CDS regions, however sequencing studies show much weaker effects on mRNA levels than from 3′UTR interactions, presumably due to competition from the translating ribosome. Consequently, most target prediction algorithms consider only 3′UTR interactions. However, the consequences of CDS interactions may have been underestimated, with the reporting of a novel mode of miRNA-CDS interaction requiring base pairing of the miRNA 3′ end, but not the canonical seed site, leading to repression of translation with little effect on mRNA turnover. Using extensive reporter, western blotting and bioinformatic analyses, we confirm that miRNAs can indeed suppress genes through CDS-interaction in special circumstances. However, in contrast to that previously reported, we find repression requires extensive base-pairing, including of the canonical seed, but does not strictly require base pairing of the 3′ miRNA terminus and is mediated through reducing mRNA levels. We conclude that suppression of endogenous genes can occur through miRNAs binding to CDS, but the requirement for extensive base-pairing likely limits the regulatory impacts to modest effects on a small subset of targets.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.