Introduction: Traumatic spinal injury is a major source of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. The number of spinal injuries is growing annually but epidemiological and demographic features may be different in different regions. This study aims to find out the prevalence of traumatic spinal injury among patients with spinal injuries admitted to the spine unit of a tertiary care centre. Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study was done on a total of 102 traumatic spinal injury patients admitted to the spine unit of a tertiary care centre from 1st June, 2019 to 31st May, 2021 after receiving ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee (Reference number: 077/78-09). Demographic details, mode of injury, morphology, patterns of fractures, neurological level, and management methods in the hospital were recorded. Convenience sampling was done. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Science version 24.0. Point estimate at 95% Confidence Interval was calculated along with frequency and percentages for binary data. Results: Among 130 spinal injury patients, the prevalence of traumatic spinal injury was found to be 102 (78.46%) (71.39-85.53 at 95% Confidence Interval). The most common mode of spinal injury was due to falls in 80 (78.43%) cases. Conclusions: The prevalence of traumatic spinal injury was higher when compared to the other studies done in similar settings.

Background: Dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) are the two most commonly used fixation devices for inter-trochanteric fracture of femur. However, many clinical studies have shown lack of differences in the  clinical outcome consistently with between these two fixation techniques. The main objective of this study is to compare the results of dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) fixation in elderly patients with unstable inter-trochanteric fractures of femur. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent operative management for inter- trochanteric fractures of femur in our hospital between February 2013 and September 2017. Elderly   patients (Age >60yrs) with unstable inter-trochanteric fracture of femur treated either with DHS fixation or with PFNA fixation were included and divided into two groups: DHS fixation group and PFNA fixation group. The comparative statistical analysis was done between two group using following   parameters: average length of the incision, operation time, blood loss, fracture healing time, and degree of postoperative functional recovery. Results: The mean follow-up period, in DHS fixation group was 16 month (range 12 to 24 months) and in PFNA fixation group was 14 months (range 12 to 18 months). The differences between two groups regarding average length of the incision, operation time, and blood loss were statistically significant (p<0.05) and better in PFNA group whereas the differences between two groups regarding fracture healing time and the degree of postoperative functional recovery were not statistically significant (p >0.05). Conclusions: PFNA fixation may be  better than DHS fixation for the treatment of unstable inter-trochanteric fractures of the femur in the elderly. However, the application and usage of DHS fixation could not be neglected and the choice of treatment depends upon the systemic condition and socioeconomic status of the patient, patient’s preferences, surgeon’s experience and availability of treatment facility.

Osteochondroma usually arises from the metaphyseal region of growing bones. The occurrence of extraskeletal osteochondroma is rare with very few case reports. Para-articular osteochondroma is a type of extraskeletal osteochondroma. It frequently occurs around the knee, usually at infrapatellar Hoffa’s fat pad. It is usually intracapsular but extrasynovial and arises from the capsule and connective tissues due to osteocartilaginous metaplasia. We present a case of 19-years male with anterior knee pain for 3 years, swelling, and deformity of the knee with flexion limitation for one year. Radiography revealed ovoid, corticated lesion free from adjoining bones. Mass interpreted as benign, so planned for excision. Well circumscribed nodule excised from the medial parapatellar approach. Histology revealed cartilaginous tissues surrounded by fibrous tissues with scattered enchondral ossification.Postoperatively and subsequent follow-up resulted in pain-free joint, complete recovery of range of motion with no clinicoradiological evidence of recurrence.

Osteochondroma, one of the commonest bone tumors, is a cartilage capped exostosis. It occurs commonly in rapidly growing ends of long bones. It’s rare in slowly growing regions of long bones. Osteochondroma present in distal tibial interosseous border causing fibular deformity is very uncommon. Osteochondroma is usually managed conservatively till the age of skeletal maturity, but distal tibial osteochondromas are managed surgically to prevent deformity, impending fibula fracture, ankle pain, syndesmotic injury irrespective of skeletal maturity. It is a case report of an 18-year-old male with gradually increasing, painless mass at the distal leg for 6 years, increasing bowing deformity since 2 years with no functional limitations. Clinical and radiological findings were consistent with distal tibial osteochondroma with deformity of the adjoining fibula. Exostosis was excised successfully leaving a thin deformed distal fibula. The result was painless, stable, and non-progressive residual ankle deformity. Histopathology confirmed the diagnosis with no malignant transformation.