Non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are foodborne pathogens of growing concern worldwide that have been associated with several recent multistate and multinational outbreaks of foodborne illness. Rapid and sensitive molecular-based bacterial strain discrimination methods are critical for timely outbreak identification and contaminated food source traceback. One such method, multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA), is being used with increasing frequency in foodborne illness outbreak investigations to augment the current gold standard bacterial subtyping technique, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). The objective of this study was to develop a MLVA assay for intra-and inter-serogroup discrimination of six major non-O157 STEC serogroups-O26, O111, O103, O121, O45, and O145-and perform a preliminary internal validation of the method on a limited number of clinical isolates. The resultant MLVA scheme consists of ten variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) loci amplified in three multiplex PCR reactions. Sixty-five unique MLVA types were obtained among 84 clinical non-O157 STEC strains comprised of geographically diverse sporadic and outbreak related isolates. Compared to PFGE, the developed MLVA scheme allowed similar discrimination among serogroups O26, O111, O103, and O121 but not among O145 and O45. To more fully compare the discriminatory power of this preliminary MLVA method to PFGE and to determine its epidemiological congruence, a thorough internal and external validation needs to be performed on a carefully selected large panel of strains, including multiple isolates from single outbreaks.

Campylobacter is a leading causing of bacterial foodborne and zoonotic illnesses in the USA. Pulsed-field gene electrophoresis (PFGE) and 7-gene multilocus sequence typing (MLST) have been historically used to differentiate sporadic from outbreak Campylobacter isolates. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) has been shown to provide superior resolution and concordance with epidemiological data when compared with PFGE and 7-gene MLST during outbreak investigations. In this study, we evaluated epidemiological concordance for high-quality SNP (hqSNP), core genome (cg)MLST and whole genome (wg)MLST to cluster or differentiate outbreak-associated and sporadic Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolates. Phylogenetic hqSNP, cgMLST and wgMLST analyses were also compared using Baker’s gamma index (BGI) and cophenetic correlation coefficients. Pairwise distances comparing all three analysis methods were compared using linear regression models. Our results showed that 68/73 sporadic C. jejuni and C. coli isolates were differentiated from outbreak-associated isolates using all three methods. There was a high correlation between cgMLST and wgMLST analyses of the isolates; the BGI, cophenetic correlation coefficient, linear regression model R 2 and Pearson correlation coefficients were >0.90. The correlation was sometimes lower comparing hqSNP analysis to the MLST-based methods; the linear regression model R 2 and Pearson correlation coefficients were between 0.60 and 0.86, and the BGI and cophenetic correlation coefficient were between 0.63 and 0.86 for some outbreak isolates. We demonstrated that C. jejuni and C. coli isolates clustered in concordance with epidemiological data using WGS-based analysis methods. Discrepancies between allele and SNP-based approaches may reflect the differences between how genomic variation (SNPs and indels) are captured between the two methods. Since cgMLST examines allele differences in genes that are common in most isolates being compared, it is well suited to surveillance: searching large genomic databases for similar isolates is easily and efficiently done using allelic profiles. On the other hand, use of an hqSNP approach is much more computer intensive and not scalable to large sets of genomes. If further resolution between potential outbreak isolates is needed, wgMLST or hqSNP analysis can be used.

Foodborne pathogens are a major public health burden in the United States, leading to 9.4 million illnesses annually. Since 1996, a national laboratory-based surveillance program, PulseNet, has used molecular subtyping and serotyping methods with the aim to reduce the burden of foodborne illness through early detection of emerging outbreaks. PulseNet affiliated laboratories have used pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and immunoassays to subtype and serotype bacterial isolates. Widespread use of serotyping and PFGE for foodborne illness surveillance over the years has resulted in the accumulation of a wealth of routine surveillance and outbreak epidemiological data. This valuable source of data has been used to understand seasonal frequency, geographic distribution, demographic information, exposure information, disease severity, and source of foodborne isolates. In 2019, PulseNet adopted whole genome sequencing (WGS) at a national scale to replace PFGE with higher-resolution methods such as the core genome multilocus sequence typing. Consequently, PulseNet's recent shift to genome-based subtyping methods has rendered the vast collection of historic surveillance data associated with serogroups and PFGE patterns potentially unusable. The goal of this study was to develop a bioinformatics method to associate the WGS data that are currently used by PulseNet for bacterial pathogen subtyping to previously characterized serogroup and PFGE patterns. Previous efforts to associate WGS to PFGE patterns relied on predicting DNA molecular weight based on restriction site analysis. However, these approaches failed owing to the non-uniform usage of genomic restriction sites by PFGE restriction enzymes. We developed a machine learning approach to classify isolates to their most probable serogroup and PFGE pattern, based on comparisons of genomic k-mer signatures. We applied our WGS classification method to 5,970 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) isolates collected as part of PulseNet's routine foodborne surveillance activities between 2003 and 2018. Our machine learning classifier is able to associate STEC WGS to higher-level serogroups with very high accuracy and lower-level PFGE patterns with somewhat lower accuracy. Taken together, these classifications support the ability of public health investigators to associate currently generated WGS data with historical epidemiological knowledge linked to serogroups and PFGE patterns in support of outbreak surveillance for food safety and public health.