This study uses a nationwide survey of health journalists (N = 774) to explore the agenda-building process in health news, examining how journalists develop story ideas, value expert source characteristics, and perceive the acceptability of using public relations materials. Results indicate that intermedia agenda setting may be a stronger influence on agenda building than are information subsidies, and that journalists rate characteristics associated with public relations training as important in expert sources. Also, journalists who take an audience advocate role are more accepting of news releases than those who take a skeptic role.When developing health news reports, journalists often use information that comes in the form of "information subsidies." An information subsidy is news information packaged free for journalists by those seeking publicity.' Public relations materials are examples of information subsidies. In the area of science and health, the literature suggests that general assignment reporters depend on subsidies because they, themselves, may know less about the story subject, and that beat or specialty reporters may use them as a means to meet deadline pressures. While there is nothing inherently wrong with using information subsidies from public relations professionals, some critics2 have raised concern about the credibility and framing power this process can confer on groups that already are perceived to have extensive societal power (e.g., corporations).One way that journalists try to maintain ownership of health stories is to rely less on information subsidies for the generation of story ideas, even though it may take more time and effort. Nevertheless, the process of producing news is complicated and influenced by many factors, not the least of which are money and time. The realities of a twenty-four-hour news cycle do not always make it practical or possible to avoid using information subsidies. The purpose of this study is to examine how health journalists make decisions about using information subsidies in reporting on health stories by analyzing how they (1) develop Maria E. Len-Rios is an assistant professor; Amanda Hinnant is an assistant professor; Sun-A Park is a doctoral student; Glen T. Cameron is a professor; Cynthia M. Frisby is an associate professor; and Youngah Lee is a doctoral student. A11 are at the University of Missouri. Fundingfor this research was provided through a grantfrom the Missouri Foundation for Health, Agreement 07-0242-HL-07. HEALTH NEWS AGENDA BUILDING 315 J~M C ~~~d vol. 86, NO. 2 S~m e r 2 0 0 9 315-331

Background: Nursing focuses on the development of an empathic relationship between the nurse and the patients. Compassionate competence, in particular, is a very important trait for oncology nurses. The current study sought to determine the degree of compassionate competence in oncology nurses, as well as to determine the relationships between compassionate competence, burnout, job stress, turnover intention, degrees of job satisfaction, and organizational commitment in oncology nurses. Materials and Methods: A descriptive correlational study evaluating the relationships between compassionate competence, burnout, job stress, turnover intention, degrees of job satisfaction, and organizational commitment in 419 oncology nurses was conducted between January 30 and February 20, 2015. Results: The average score of compassionate competence for oncology nurses in the current study was higher than for clinical nurses. Conclusions: The correlational analysis between compassionate competence and organizational commitment, burnout, job stress, turnover intention, and degree of job satisfaction revealed a high correlation between compassionate competence and positive job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Conclusions: Compassionate competence was higher in oncology nurses than in nurses investigated in previous studies and positively correlated with work experience. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment in nurses may be improved through compassionate competence enhancement programs that employ a variety of experiences.

Within the context of a pandemic flu, this experiment investigated whether source (government officials or physicians), severity condition (high or low), and mention of self-efficacy method (mention present or absent) in H1N1 health news affected participants' (a) perception of media influence on self and others and (b) intentions to get vaccinated. Results found support for third-person effects, and the magnitude of the effects grew with social distance. Main effect of source, as well as interaction effects among the independent variables on third-person effect and vaccination intentions, were also found.

No abstract