Background: While doublet therapies provide important first-line treatment options in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), novel and mechanistically distinct agents are needed for pts who are not cured by/intolerant of such therapies. Due to the high incidence (~80%) of CD70 antigen expression in primary and mRCC, yet limited expression in normal tissue, ccRCC is an attractive proof-of-concept tumor for CD70 directed allogeneic CAR T. TRAVERSE (NCT04696731), a first-in-human trial, seeks to identify a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ALLO-316 after conditioning with fludarabine/cyclophosphamide with/without ALLO-647 in pts with advanced or metastatic ccRCC. ALLO-316 is an anti-CD70 allogeneic CAR T cell product that utilizes TALEN® gene editing to knock out TCRα constant gene to reduce the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and knock out CD52 gene to permit use of ALLO-647 (a humanized anti-CD52 mAb) to selectively deplete host T cells without affecting allogeneic CAR T cells. Methods: This multicenter, single-arm, open-label, 3+3 dose-escalation trial enrolls adults with advanced or metastatic ccRCC and ≥1 measurable lesion and ECOG Performance Status 0 or 1. Prior treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor and a vascular endothelial growth-factor targeted therapy was required, with evidence of progression on/after treatment or discontinuation due to toxicity. ALLO-316 is administered at escalating doses (40 - 240 × 106 allogeneic CAR+ cells IV) on Day 0 after conditioning. The primary endpoint is a target incidence rate for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) <33% in the first 28 days after infusion of ALLO-316. Results: By 12/3/2022, 18 pts with ccRCC (median age: 63 yrs; 82% male) were enrolled; all (100%) 17 pts who received ALLO-316, had metastatic disease with 3 lines (median) of prior therapy. Eleven (65%) of these pts experienced CRS, all low Gr except one (6%) Gr 3. No ICANS or GVHD was observed. One (6%) DLT (elevated LFT) was observed and required dose expansion. MTD has not yet been reached. Three pts achieved best overall response of PR at all time points with two PRs confirmed at subsequent visits; ORR = 12% and disease control rate (DCR) = 71%. In pts with confirmed CD70+ tumors (n=9), confirmed ORR = 22% (unconfirmed ORR = 33%) and DCR = 100%. High CAR T cell expansion was observed in peripheral blood (median Cmax > 35,000 copies/μg) and high VCN in available tumor aspirates (n=3). Conclusions: ALLO-316, an allogeneic CAR T cell product targeting CD70 in advanced mRCC, is demonstrating encouraging antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile. A single administration of ALLO-316 could be an effective treatment for pts with CD70+ solid tumors, including RCC, and hematologic malignancies. The MTD for ALLO-316 in TRAVERSE will support Phase 2 trial design. Enrollment of pts with CD70+ tumors is ongoing. Citation Format: Samer Srour, Ritesh Kotecha, Brendan Curti, Jad Chahoud, Alexandra Drakaki, Lily Tang, Lovely Goyal, Sacha Prashad, Victoria Szenes, Kevin Norwood, Sumanta Pal. A phase 1 multicenter study (TRAVERSE) evaluating the safety and efficacy of ALLO-316 following conditioning regimen in pts with advanced or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT011.
678 Background: Recent studies have suggested an association between the time-of-day of ICI infusions and disease outcomes, including progression free survival and overall survival, among patients with cancer. (Qian et al Lancet Oncology 2021). We sought to identify whether such an association exists in patients with mRCC receiving ICIs. Methods: Patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab alone, or in combination with ipilimumab, in either first- or second-line treatment were retrospectively identified. Patients who received <25% of infusions after 4:30 pm were assigned to the early time of infusion (TOI) sub-cohort while patients who received ≥ 25% of infusions after 4:30 pm were assigned to the late TOI sub-cohort. Objective response rate (ORR, per RECIST 1.1), time to treatment failure (TTF, defined as time from the date of first ICI infusion to time of treatment discontinuation), and overall survival (OS) were compared across the two groups using Cox proportional hazard models before and after adjustment for potential confounders (age, gender, line of treatment, IMDC risk, and histologic subtype). Results: A total of 145 mRCC pts (M:F,102:43) were included in the analysis. Median age was 64 (range 31-89) years, 81.4% had clear cell histology, and 75.9% had intermediate/poor risk disease. Early TOI sub-cohort included 110 (75.9%) patients while late TOI sub-cohort included 35 (24.1%) patients. Baseline characteristics were comparable across the two groups. Median OS for the entire cohort was 41.7 months (95% CI, 33.0 – Not reached [NR]), with a median TTF of 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.0 – 10.8). ORR was 32.7% in early TOI sub-group versus 25% in late TOI sub-group (p=0.60). Median TTF for the early TOI sub-cohort was 8.3 months (95% CI 6.0 – 12.6), as compared to 4.4 months (95% CI 2.1 - 10.8) among the late TOI group with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.50 – 1.25; p=0.32). Multivariate analysis showed a HR of 1.55 (95% CI, 0.98 – 2.57; p=0.06) after adjustment for potential confounders. The median OS was 46.3 months (95% CI, 32.2 – NR) in early TOI sub-cohort versus 41.7 months (95% CI, 16.7 – NR) in late TOI sub-group with a HR of 0.67 (95% CI 0.37 – 1.23; p=0.20) in univariate analyses and 0.61 (95% CI 0.33 – 1.15; p=0.13) in multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated a numerical increase in ORR, TTF and OS with early TOI compared to late TOI, with the TTF difference approaching significance after adjustment for potential confounders. Larger randomized and controlled investigations are warranted to examine the impact of chronomodulation on the efficacy of ICIs in cancers, including mRCC.
600 Background: The outcomes of patients with brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are not well characterized due to exclusion of these patients from clinical trials. Methods: Using the IMDC, patients with brain metastases from RCC at the initiation of first-line therapy were analyzed. Baseline patient characteristics, brain-directed local therapies, clinician assessment of best overall response as per RECIST 1.1, and overall survival (OS) were compared across first-line therapies, namely immuno-oncology (IO)-based combination therapy (IO/IO or IO/vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)) and anti-VEGF monotherapy (sunitinib or pazopanib). Results: The overall cohort of patients with brain metastases included 775 patients, consisting of 78/1298 (6.0%) and 697/8633 (8.1%) in the IO-based and anti-VEGF cohorts, respectively (p = 0.009). Among the baseline patient characteristics, only the proportion of patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy differed significantly across the IO-based and anti-VEGF cohorts with proportions of 25.0% and 55.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). Best overall response in all disease sites was 3.4% complete response (CR), 25.9% partial response (PR), 39.7% stable disease (SD), and 31% progressive disease (PD) in the IO-based cohort, whereas it was 0.7% CR, 29.6% PR, 36.7% SD, and 33.0% PD in the anti-VEGF cohort (p = 0.223). The following factors were significantly associated with longer OS on multivariable analysis: IMDC favourable-/intermediate-risk (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.37–0.65; p < 0.001), IO-based combination therapy (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29–0.92; p = 0.026), neurosurgery (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47–0.83; p = 0.001), and stereotactic radiosurgery (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49–0.84; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with brain metastases receiving IO-based combination therapy may have longer OS than those receiving anti-VEGF monotherapy. Brain-directed local therapies including neurosurgery and stereotactic radiosurgery were associated with longer OS. [Table: see text]
536 Background: Cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been associated with functional cures (i.e., DDFTFS) in a small subset of patients with mUC. However, the mechanistic basis for this phenomenon has remained elusive. Immune checkpoint blockade may enhance the ability of cisplatin-based chemotherapy to cure mUC, particularly if the latter is achieved by promoting antitumor immunity. From a phase II trial evaluating a phased schedule of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) followed by GC plus Ipilimumab (Ipi) for mUC, 4/36 patients were treatment-free disease-free >7 years after initiation of treatment. We sought to identify the immunological mechanisms associated with functional cure of such patients. Methods: Whole exome sequencing was performed on pre-treatment archival tumor tissue. Neoantigen binding affinity was predicted using NetMHCcons. Neoantigen-specific T cell response was assessed via IFNγ ELISpot assays after co-culture of patient-derived peripheral blood CD4+ and CD8+ T cells with autologous neoantigen-pulsed antigen presenting B cells. Serum protein soluble analytes were measured using the Olink Target 96 Immuno-Oncology Panel at the pre-treatment, post-GC, and post-GC+Ipi timepoints. Results: CD4+ and CD8+ neoantigen-specific T cell reactivity was measured at serial timepoints in 2 patients achieving DDFTFS and 5 patients not achieving DDFTFS. Strikingly, peripheral blood CD4+ and CD8+ T cell reactivity to a predicted neoantigen emerged on cycle 6 day 1 (after 2 cycles of GC followed by 4 cycles of GC + Ipi) in 2/2 patients achieving DDFTFS (variant in TP53 or DHX9) but in 0/5 patients not achieving DDFTFS. Peripheral serum proteomic analysis at serial timepoints (n = 35 patients) revealed that pre-treatment, patients achieving DDFTFS demonstrated an immune activated phenotype with elevations in cytotoxic adaptive immunity markers and immune checkpoints (Table). After the addition of Ipi, patients achieving DDFTFS demonstrated decreased markers of tumor-promoting inflammation but increased markers of adaptive immunity, co-stimulation, and cytotoxicity. Conclusions: Anti-tumor immunity may underlie functional cures achieved in patients with mUC treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy +/- immune checkpoint blockade. Probing the mechanistic basis for DDFTFS may facilitate the identification of pre- and on-treatment features, and therapeutic components and sequences, necessary to extend this ultimate therapeutic goal to a larger subset of patients. [Table: see text]
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.