Analyses of AREDS2 data on natural history of GA provide representative data on GA evolution and enlargement. GA enlargement, which was influenced by lesion features, was relentless, resulting in rapid central vision loss. The genetic variants associated with faster enlargement were partially distinct from those associated with risk of incident GA. These findings are relevant to further investigations of GA pathogenesis and clinical trial planning.

No abstract

This study replicates the results of previous natural history studies of eyes with DPED including the high rates of progression to late AMD and vision loss (regardless of progression to late AMD). The genetic associations are consistent with genes associated with AMD progression.

The paper provides a review of current issues relating to the use of DNA profiling in forensic science. A short historical section gives the main statistical milestones that occurred during a rapid development of DNA technology and operational uses. Greater detail is then provided for interpretation issues involving STR DNA profiles, including:-methods that take account of population substructure in DNA calculations; -parallel work carried out by the US National Research Council; -the move away from multiple independence testing in favour of experiments that demonstrate the robustness of casework procedures; -the questionable practice of source attribution 'with reasonable scientific certainty'; -the effect on the interpretation of profiles obtained under increasingly sensitive techniques, the LCN technique in particular; -the use of DNA profiles as an intelligence tool; -the interpretation of DNA mixtures.Experience of presenting DNA evidence within UK courts is also discussed. The paper then summarises a generic interpretation framework based on the concept of likelihood ratio within a hierarchy of propositions. Finally the use of Bayesian networks to interpret DNA evidence is reviewed.

DNA profiling has been automated by the fluorescent tagging of amplified variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) loci. This was achieved by the use of fluorescently labeled primers in the amplification of 10 ng of genomic DNA, coupled with laser detection of the products during electrophoresis. The PCR products are sized by co-electrophoresing a standard size ladder mixed with every sample, thereby eliminating errors in size estimation caused by lane-to-lane differences in migration rate. This increases the precision of VNTR characterization and enables alleles that differ by a single 1S-bp repeat to be resolved. The system is capable of high throughput: Twenty-four samples are electrophoresed and analyzed within 6 hr. Also, because four different dyes are available, three different loci can be simultaneously characterized with the fourth dye used for the internal standard. Approximately 100 unrelated British caucasians were analyzed at the loci DIS80, D17SS, and ApoB. The probabilities of two unrelated individuals matching by chance (pM) at these three loci were determined to be 0.065, 0.040, and 0.069, respectively, with a combined pM of 1.8 • 10 -4.

This letter comments on the report "Forensic science in criminal courts: Ensuring scientific validity of feature-comparison methods" recently released by the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). The report advocates a procedure for evaluation of forensic evidence that is a two-stage procedure in which the first stage is "match"/"non-match" and the second stage is empirical assessment of sensitivity (correct acceptance) and false alarm (false acceptance) rates. Almost always, quantitative data from feature-comparison methods are continuously-valued and have within-source variability. We explain why a two-stage procedure is not appropriate for this type of data, and recommend use of statistical procedures which are appropriate.

Transformation of Neurospora crassa spheroplasts is reported for three different genes, using uncloned Neurospora DNA, both naked and encapsulated in synthetic phosphatidylserine liposomes. Whereas transformation by naked DNA is DNase-sensitive, that by liposomes is not. Per unit of transforming DNA, liposome transformation is significantly more efficient than that with naked DNA, ranging from 19x for the am gene to 41x for pyr-3. Levels of activity of pyr-3 and am transformants, and segregation data on pyr-3 transformation are given.

No abstract