We conclude that Drad21, as a member of a cohesin complex, is required in Drosophila cultured cells and embryos for proper mitotic progression. The protein is required in cultured cells for chromosome cohesion, spindle morphology, dynamics of a chromosome passenger protein, and stability of the cohesin complex, but apparently not for normal chromosome condensation. The observation of SA instability in the absence of Drad21 implies that the expression of cohesin subunits and assembly of the cohesin complex will be tightly regulated.

The precise mechanism of chromosome condensation and decondensation remains a mystery, despite progress over the last 20 years aimed at identifying components essential to the mitotic compaction of the genome. In this study, we analyse the localization and role of the CAP-D2 non-SMC condensin subunit and its effect on the stability of the condensin complex. We demonstrate that a condensin complex exists in Drosophila embryos, containing CAP-D2, the anticipated SMC2 and SMC4 proteins, the CAP-H/Barren and CAP-G (non-SMC) subunits. We show that CAP-D2 is a nuclear protein throughout interphase, increasing in level during S phase, present on chromosome axes in mitosis, and still present on chromosomes as they start to decondense late in mitosis. We analysed the consequences of CAP-D2 loss after dsRNA-mediated interference, and discovered that the protein is essential for chromosome arm and centromere resolution. The loss of CAP-D2 after RNAi has additional downstream consequences on the stability of CAP-H, the localization of DNA topoisomerase II and other condensin subunits, and chromosome segregation. Finally, we discovered that even after interfering with two components important for chromosome architecture (DNA topoisomerase II and condensin), chromosomes were still able to compact, paving the way for the identification of further components or activities required for this essential process.

Using a stringent purification procedure on singlestranded DNA cellulose, we have isolated the mitochondrial single-stranded DNA-binding protein from Drosophila melanogaster embryos. Its identity is demonstrated by amino-terminal sequencing of the homogeneous protein and by its localization to a mitochondrial protein fraction. The mitochondrial protein is immunologically and biochemically distinct from the previously characterized nuclear replication protein A from Drosophila (Mitsis, P. G., Kowalczykowski, S. C., and Lehman, I. R. Many of the processes involved in DNA metabolism including DNA replication, recombination, and repair, generate intermediates containing single-stranded regions of DNA. These regions are stabilized and kept accessible for the various catalytic processes by the binding of single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs).1 Prokaryotic SSBs (e.g. Escherichia coli (Eco) SSB and bacteriophage T4 gene 32 protein) are generally small proteins which bind to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) with high affinity. They show high specificity for ssDNA over doublestranded DNA (dsDNA) and RNA, but display little sequence specificity (reviewed in Refs. 1-3). Although they do not exhibit direct catalytic function, they stimulate DNA replication in vitro. Mitochondrial DNA replication is independent from chromosomal DNA replication and is carried out largely with specific mitochondrial replication proteins including the mitochondrial DNA polymerase (pol ␥) and an SSB (mtSSB) distinct from the nuclear SSB, replication protein A (RP-A). mtSSB appears to serve an important function during mtDNA replication, by stabilizing the displaced ssDNA that is the template for lagging DNA strand synthesis (4). mtSSBs have been isolated from several species including rat (4, 5), Xenopus laevis (6), and yeast (7). These proteins consist of a single small (13-16 kDa) polypeptide, which shows a high degree of similarity to Eco SSB in its primary structure (7,8). Although all the functions of mtSSB in mtDNA metabolism have not been defined, it is critical for replication, because deletion of the yeast protein (RIM1) causes loss of mitochondrial DNA (7). Consistent with a role in mtDNA replication, interactions between mtSSB and other mitochondrial replication proteins have been observed. In vitro studies indicate that under some conditions, the rat and X. laevis mtSSBs stimulate partially purified forms of mitochondrial DNA polymerase (9, 10), and a putative human mtSSB stimulates human pol ␥ (11). In addition, genetic evidence from yeast suggests an interaction between RIM1 and the mtDNA helicase, PIF1 (7).We have purified a single-stranded DNA-binding protein from Drosophila embryos (hereafter called Dm mtSSB) to near homogeneity. Its physical and biochemical properties demonstrate that it is distinct from the nuclear SSB, dRP-A, but has a high degree of similarity to Eco SSB and to eukaryotic mtSSBs. Further, its functional interaction with the near-homogeneous mitochondrial DNA polymerase from Drosophila melanogaster embryos (1...

BackgroundThe MCM2-7 proteins are crucial components of the pre replication complex (preRC) in eukaryotes. Since they are significantly more abundant than other preRC components, we were interested in determining whether the entire cellular content was necessary for DNA replication in vivo.Methodology/Principle FindingsWe performed a systematic depletion of the MCM proteins in Drosophila S2 cells using dsRNA-interference. Reducing MCM2-6 levels by >95–99% had no significant effect on cell cycle distribution or viability. Depletion of MCM7 however caused an S-phase arrest. MCM2-7 depletion produced no change in the number of replication forks as measured by PCNA loading. We also depleted MCM8. This caused a 30% reduction in fork number, but no significant effect on cell cycle distribution or viability. No additive effects were observed by co-depleting MCM8 and MCM5.Conclusions/SignificanceThese studies suggest that, in agreement with what has previously been observed for Xenopus in vitro, not all of the cellular content of MCM2-6 proteins is needed for normal cell cycling. They also reveal an unexpected unique role for MCM7. Finally they suggest that MCM8 has a role in DNA replication in S2 cells.