Objective: To visualize and analyze the published literature on diabetes and pyroptosis based on a bibliometric approach, so as to provide a comprehensive picture of the hot research directions and dynamic progress in this field. Methods: This study was based on the web of science core collection database to conduct a comprehensive search of the published literature in the field of diabetes and Pyroptosis from January 1985 to August 2022, including the published research literature in this field, as well as a visual analysis of the number of citations, year of publication, journal, author, research institution, country, and research topic. Results: A total of 139 literature on research related to diabetes and cellular scorch from 2011 to 2022 were retrieved, with a total of 3009 citations and a maximum of 255 citations for a single article, which had a first authorSchmid-Burgk, JLThe first author of this article is from Germany; among 20 publishing countries, China leads with 100 articles; among 222 publishing institutions, Harbin Medical University leads with 18 articles and 184 citations; among 980 authors, Chen, X from China tops the list of high-impact authors with 5 articles and 29 citations; Among the 98 journals, "CELL DEATH DISEASE" ranked first in both volume and high impact journals with 4 articles and 29 citations; among 349 keywords, "pyroptosis" ranked first with a cumulative frequency of 65 times. The cluster analysis was divided into three categories, chronic complications of diabetes and pyroptosis (67 articles), diabetes and pyroptosis (60 articles), and diabetes combined with other diseases and pyroptosis (12 articles), and the number of articles related to diabetes and its chronic complications increased rapidly from 2019, among which, diabetic cardiomyopathy (27 articles) had the highest number of articles. Conclusions: Based on a comprehensive analysis of published literature in the field of diabetes and pyroptosis from 2011-2022, this study achieved a visual analysis of studies with significant and outstanding contributions to the field, thus framing a picture showing the development and changes in the field. At the same time, this study provides research information and direction for clinicians and investigators to conduct diabetes and pyroptosis related research in the future.
ObjectiveTo observe the distribution characteristics of peripheral blood inflammatory indexes and retinal macular area optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging biomarkers in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) with or without diabetic nephropathy (DN), in order to seek clinical biomarkers that can predict the development of DR and DN.MethodsA total of 169 inpatients with DR who visited the ophthalmology department of the Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from October 2020 to June 2022 and had complete clinical data were collected, and the patients with DR were divided into two major groups, DR and DR/DN, according to whether they had DN, and then further divided into four subgroups, Non-proliferative DR(NPDR), proliferative DR(PDR), NPDR/DN and PDR/DN, according to the stage of DR. The distribution characteristics of peripheral blood inflammatory indexes [Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio(NLR) and Platelet to neutrophil ratio(PLR)], renal function indexes [Cystatin-C(CYS-C), Creatinine(Crea), Uric acid(UA)and Urinary albumin to creatinine ratio(UACR)] and OCT imaging indexes [Hyperreflective foci(HRF), Disorgnization of retinal inner layers(DRIL), Outer retinal tubulations(ORTs), Central retinal thickness(CRT), Retinal nerve fiber layer(RNFL) and Ganglion cell layer(GCL)] were analyzed between the above subgroups.ResultsThere was no difference between DR and DR/DN groups in terms of gender, family history of diabetes, duration of diabetes and Body mass index(BMI) (P>0.05), the mean age of the DR/DN group was significantly lower than that of the DR group (P<0.05), and the proportion of the DR/DN group with a history of hypertension was significantly higher than that of the DR group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in hemoglobin A1C(HbA1c) between DR and DR/DN groups (P>0.05). (P>0.05), Hemoglobin(HGB) was significantly higher in the DR group than in the DR/DN group (P <0.05), NLR, PLR, Crea, UA and CYS-C were significantly higher in the DR/DN group than in the DR group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the comparison of HRF, DRIL, ORTs positive rate and CRT between the DR and DR/DN groups (P>0.05). RNFL and GCL thickness were significantly lower in the DR/DN group than in the DR group (P<0.05); history of hypertension (OR=2.759), NLR (OR=1.316), PLR (OR=1.009), Crea (OR=1.018), UA (OR=1.004), CYS-C (OR=3.742) were the independent (OR=0.951), age (OR=0.951), HGB (OR=0.976), RNFL (OR=0.909) and GCL (OR=0.945) were independent protective factors for DR/DN; RNFL (OR=0.899) and GCL (OR=0.935) were independent protective factors for NPDR/DN, RNFL (OR=0.852) and GCL (OR=0.928) were independent protective factors for PDR/DN. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for CYS-C, PLR, Crea, UA and the combination of the four indicators to predict DR/DN were 0.717, 0.625, 0.647, 0.616 and 0.717, respectively.Conclusions(1) Low age combined with hypertension HGB, NLR, PLR, CYS-C, Crea and UA may be serum biological markers for predicting DN in DR; meanwhile, PLR, CYS-C, Crea, UA and the combination of the four indicators can be used for risk assessment and adjunctive diagnosis of DN in DR combined with hypertension. (2) The RNFL and GCL thickness in the temporal aspect of the central macular sulcus may be imaging biological markers for predicting DN in DR; meanwhile, GCL thickness may have important value for risk prediction and diagnosis of DN in combination with DR.
Background. Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most common retinal vascular disease in the world after diabetic retinopathy. Moreover, macular edema (ME) is the main cause of visual impairment in RVO patients. Intravitreal injection of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents is recommended for RVO-ME. However, repeated injections severely limit their efficacy. Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) is widely used in RVO-ME as adjuvant therapy in China. Objective. The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF combined with CHM for RVO-ME and to provide reliable evidence for clinical application. Methods. Seven databases were searched without language or publication status restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anti-VEGF combined with CHM (anti-VEGF + CHM) versus anti-VEGF in participants with RVO-ME were included in this study. The “risk of bias assessment tool” of the Cochrane Handbook was applied to assess the quality of included trials, and RevMan 5.3 software was used for data analysis. Results. A total of 10 relevant trials with 743 patients were identified. The results showed that BCVA of the anti-VEGF + CHM group significantly improved at 3 months ( P < 0.00001 ), 6 months ( P = 0.008 ), and 12 months ( P = 0.01 ), and CMT significantly reduced at 1 month ( P = 0.02 ), 2 months ( P = 0.0009 ), 3 months ( P < 0.05 ), 6 months ( P < 0.0001 ), and 12 months ( P < 0.00001 ) compared with the anti-VEGF group alone. At the same time, the anti-VEGF + CHM group has a better performance in reducing the number of injections ( P < 0.05 ) and improving the total effective rate ( P < 0.0001 ). However, regarding adverse events, there was no statistical difference between the two groups ( P = 0.09 ). Conclusions. Our results provide promising evidence that anti-VEGF therapy combined with CHM may be more beneficial to patients than anti-VEGF therapy alone. However, because of the low quality and small sample size of the included studies, more rigorous and larger-scale trials were necessary to validate our results. Registration Number. CRD42021270262.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.