SummaryMobilised peripheral blood is now the main source of stem cells collected from normal donors. We report our experience of mobilising and collecting 400 normal healthy donors using standardised procedures and techniques. Target recipient doses were reached with one aphaeresis in 63% of donors and with two aphereses in 81% of donors. Approximately 2% of donors yielded such low progenitor values that they were termed 'poor mobilisers'. There were minor effects of donor age, weight and sex and where possible, larger male donors under the age of 55 years should be selected. Two forms of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) were used at the same dose and no significant difference was seen in the yield of CD34 + cells collected/l of blood processed. However, a greater number of granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming cells were harvested using lenograstim (glycosylated G-CSF) compared with filgrastim (non-glycosylated G-CSF; P ¼ 0AE002). CD34 + cell yields were also measured halfway through the aphaeresis procedure. This was found to be highly predictive of final yield and facilitated distribution of the stem cell product to other centres. The observation that CD34 + yields did not decline in the second half compared with the first half of aphaeresis suggests that the circulating cell numbers are not static.
The role of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in the management of lymphoid malignancies after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) has not been clearly characterized. There is emerging evidence pointing to the effectiveness of this approach, particularly in patients with low-grade disease, although to date this has been reported only in small numbers of patients, and thus the utility of this treatment remains uncertain. A total of 28 patients with low-grade lymphoid malignancies previously treated with allogeneic SCT received a total of 68 infusions of donor lymphocytes. The diagnoses were indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL; n = 23) and transformed NHL (n = 5), and the indications for DLI were progressive disease with or without mixed chimerism (MC) (n = 17) and persistent MC alone (n = 11). Escalating doses of cells were administered in the absence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or continued disease progression, until stable full donor chimerism or disease response were achieved. The cumulative response rates after DLI to treat progressive disease and persistent MC were 76.5% and 91.6%, respectively. The major toxicity resulting from the use of donor lymphocytes was GVHD. The cumulative incidence of acute grade II-IV disease was 15%, and that of extensive chronic disease was 31%; there were no deaths resulting from GVHD. Seven patients had graft-versus-lymphoma responses without significant GVHD. These data support the existence of a clinically significant graft-versus-tumor effect in indolent NHL and suggest that this is an effective treatment for progressive disease after allogeneic SCT.
Cyclophosphamide 1.5 g m−2followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is an effective peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilizing regimen, but has limited anti-lymphoma activity. We therefore assessed the mobilizing potential of ESHAP (etoposide, ara-C, methylprednisolone and cisplatin), a potent second-line lymphoma regimen followed by G-CSF. The results were compared in 78 patients with relapsed or resistant lymphomas with the use of cyclophosphamide 1.5 g m−2followed by G-CSF in a matched pairs analysis, matching the ESHAP recipients (for predetermined prognostic factors) from a cohort of 178 lymphoma patients mobilized with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF. The total numbers of mononuclear cells collected at apheresis was similar with both regimens but ESHAP plus G-CSF resulted in a significantly higher percentage of CD34+ cells, absolute number of CD34+ cells and GM-CFC (all with P -values < 0.001). The number of patients requiring only one apheresis harvest to achieve a CD34+ cell yield of > 2.0 × 106kg−1was greatly increased in the ESHAP recipients (56/78 vs 17/78, P< 0.001). The total number of progenitor cells collected was not significantly different with the two mobilization regimens because of this higher number of apheresis in the cyclophosphamide group. The proportion of patients who failed to achieve a minimum CD34+ cell target of 1 × 106kg−1with the pooled harvests was less in the ESHAP arm (four patients vs nine patients) despite an increased number of aphereses in the cyclophosphamide recipients. ESHAP plus G-CSF is well tolerated and is an excellent mobilization regimen in patients with pre treated lymphoma. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.