Severe hypoglycaemia remains a significant clinical problem in type 1 diabetes. The rate of severe hypoglycaemia and the influence of risk markers are very sensitive to selection and differences in rates between centres or studies seem to disappear after correction for differences in clinical characteristics. Smoking is a novel overall risk marker of severe hypoglycaemia.
The frequency of symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes was studied in 411 randomly selected conventionally treated Type 1 diabetic out-patients. Between two consecutive visits to the out-patient clinic each patient filled in a questionnaire at home. The number of hypoglycaemic episodes was then recorded prospectively in a diary for 1 week. From the questionnaires, the (retrospective) frequencies of mild and severe symptomatic hypoglycaemia were 1.6 and 0.029 episodes patient-1 week-1. From the diaries, the (prospective) frequencies of mild and severe hypoglycaemic episodes were 1.8 and 0.027 patient-1 week-1. Symptomatic hypoglycaemia was more frequent on working days than during weekends (1.8:1) and more frequent in the morning than during the afternoon, evening, and night (4.5:2.2:1.4:1). The symptoms of hypoglycaemia were non-specific, heterogeneous, and weakened with increasing duration of diabetes. During their diabetic life, 36% of the patients had experienced hypoglycaemic coma. The frequency of hypoglycaemia was positively, but only weakly, correlated with insulin dose, number of injections, percentage unmodified insulin of the total dose, and HbA1c (mild hypoglycaemia only). The frequency was also negatively, but weakly, correlated with age and HbA1c (episodes with coma only), but not correlated with sex, duration of diabetes, or patients' ratings of worries about mild and severe hypoglycaemia.
Where adjustments of diet, physical activity, and dosage of insulin are well known to diabetologists and diabetic patients, present-day knowledge of factors of importance to the pharmacokinetics of insulin is frequently ignored. The pharmacokinetics of insulin comprise the absorption process, the distribution including binding to circulating insulin antibodies, if present, and to insulin receptors, and its ultimate degradation and excretion. The distribution and metabolism of absorbed insulin follow that of endogenous insulin. The distribution and metabolism cannot be actively changed, except in the case of circulating insulin antibodies, which in rare cases also may cause insulin resistance. The use of insulin preparation of low immunogeneity will avoid or reduce this course of variation in action. The absorption process, the detailed mechanisms of which are still unknown, is influenced by many variables where some can be controlled, thereby reducing the intrapatient variability in insulin absorption, which may reach 35%, causing a corresponding metabolic lability. Besides the known differences in timing among different preparations, the size of dose, the injected volume, and the insulin concentration are determinants of absorption role. Fortuitous injection technique contributes to variance, as do changes in blood flow of the injected tissue. This may be induced by changes in ambient temperature, exercise of injected limb, or local massage. Regional differences are also due to differences in blood flow. Serum insulin peaks may peak up to 1 h after injection of soluble insulin into the thigh versus into the abdominal wall. Local degradation of insulin seems of less importance but may, in rare cases, be the cause of high insulin "requirements." Available evidence is reviewed and the importance of implementing the consequences in the daily care of the insulin-treated patient is emphasized.
People with type 1 diabetes generally remember severe hypoglycaemic episodes during a one-year period. A simple method is proposed for classifying the state of awareness of hypoglycaemia in clinical practice.
The relation between blood glucose concentration, the symptoms and signs of hypoglycaemia, and electroencephalographic changes in diabetic patients is not known. The effect of hypoglycaemia on brain function was studied in 13 patients with insulin dependent diabetes. During a gradual fall in blood glucose concentration induced by a bolus injection of insulin followed by an intravenous infusion of insulin, during 60 minutes of biochemical hypoglycaemia, and after restoration of normoglycaemia with intravenous glucose electroencephalograms were evaluated continuously by period-amplitude analysis; blood samples were taken every 10 minutes throughout. No changes were seen in electroencephalograms when the blood glucose concentration was above 3 mmol/l. At a median blood glucose concentration of 2·0 (95% confidence interval 1·7 to 2·3) mmol/l alpha activity decreased abruptly in the electroencephalograms concomitant with an increase in theta activity, reflecting neuronal dysfunction in the cortex. When the blood glucose concentration was further lowered changes were observed in the electroencephalograms indicating that deeper brain structures were affected. A normal electroencephalogram was re-established at a blood glucose concentration of 2·0 (1·8 to 2·1) mmol/l. There was no significant correlation between the blood glucose concentration at the onset of changes in the electroencephalograms and age, duration of diabetes, insulin dose, haemoglobin A1c concentration, initial blood glucose concentration, rate of fall in blood glucose concentration, and appearance of symptoms and signs of hypoglycaemia.
Changes in electroencephalograms during hypoglycaemia appear and disappear at such a narrow range of blood glucose concentrations that the term threshold blood glucose concentration for the onset of such changes seems justified.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.