Currently, two main known mechanisms of aluminum (Al) nanoparticle reaction are discussed in the literature, namely those based on diffusion through an oxide shell and melt-dispersion. The two mechanisms lead to opposite predictions in nanoparticle design. The diffusion mechanism suggests that the reduction or complete elimination of the oxide shell will increase Al reactivity, whereas the meltdispersion mechanism suggests an increase in initial oxide thickness up to an optimal value. The goal of this study is to perform critical experiments in a confined flame tube apparatus to compare these two predictions. Specifically, the flame propagation rates of perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acid (C 13F27COOH)-treated Al nanoparticles with and without an alumina shell were measured. Results show that when there is no alumina passivation shell encasing the Al core, the flame rate decreases by a factor of 22-95 and peak pressure deceases by 3 orders of magnitude, in comparison with the Al particles with an oxide shell. These results imply that the meltdispersion reaction mechanism is responsible for high flame propagation rates observed in these confined tube experiments.
KeywordsAl-nanoparticles, critical experiment, diffusion mechanisms, flame propagation, flame propagation rate, flame tube, optimal values, oxide shell, oxide thickness, peak pressure, mechanical engineering, material science and engineering Currently, two main known mechanisms of aluminum (Al) nanoparticle reaction are discussed in the literature, namely those based on diffusion through an oxide shell and melt-dispersion. The two mechanisms lead to opposite predictions in nanoparticle design. The diffusion mechanism suggests that the reduction or complete elimination of the oxide shell will increase Al reactivity, whereas the meltdispersion mechanism suggests an increase in initial oxide thickness up to an optimal value. The goal of this study is to perform critical experiments in a confined flame tube apparatus to compare these two predictions. Specifically, the flame propagation rates of perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acid (C 13 F 27 COOH)-treated Al nanoparticles with and without an alumina shell were measured. Results show that when there is no alumina passivation shell encasing the Al core, the flame rate decreases by a factor of 22-95 and peak pressure deceases by 3 orders of magnitude, in comparison with the Al particles with an oxide shell. These results imply that the melt-dispersion reaction mechanism is responsible for high flame propagation rates observed in these confined tube experiments.
Flame propagation and peak pressure measurements were taken of two nanoscaled thermites using aluminum (Al) fuel and copper oxide (CuO) or nickel oxide (NiO) oxidizers in a confined flame tube apparatus. Thermal equilibrium simulations predict that the Al+CuO reaction exhibits high gas generation and, thus, high convective flame propagation rates while the Al+NiO reaction produces little to no gas and, therefore, should exhibit much lower flame propagation rates. Results show flame propagation rates ranged between 200 m/s and 600 m/s and peak pressures ranged between 1.7 MPa and 3.7 MPa for both composites. These results were significantly higher than expected for the Al+NiO, which generates virtually no gas. For nanometric Al particles, oxidation has recently been described by a melt-dispersion oxidation mechanism that involves a dispersion of high velocity alumina shell fragments and molten Al droplets that promote a pressure build-up by inducing a bulk movement of fluid. This mechanism unique to nanoparticle reaction may promote convection without the need for additional gas generation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.