Objective While the Benjamin-Inglis classification system is widely used to categorize laryngeal clefts, it does not clearly differentiate a type 1 cleft from normal anatomy, and there is no widely accepted or validated protocol for systematically evaluating interarytenoid mucosal height. We sought to propose the interarytenoid assessment protocol as a method to standardize the description of the interarytenoid anatomy and to test its reliability. Study Design Retrospective review of endoscopic videos. Setting Pediatric academic center. Subjects and Methods The interarytenoid assessment protocol comprises 4 steps for evaluation of the interarytenoid region relative to known anatomic landmarks in the supraglottis, glottis, and subglottis. Thirty consecutively selected videos of the protocol were reviewed by 4 otolaryngologists. The raters were blinded to identifying information, and the video order was randomized for each review. We assessed protocol completion times and calculated Cohen’s linear-weighted κ coefficient between blinded expert raters and with the operating surgeon to evaluate interrater/intrarater reliability. Results Median age was 4.9 years (59 months; range, 1 month to 20 years). Median completion time was 144 seconds. Interrater and intrarater reliability showed substantial agreement (interrater κ = 0.71 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.55-0.87]; intrarater mean κ = 0.70 [95% CI, 0.59-0.92/rater 1, 0.47-0.85/rater 2]; P < .001). Comparing raters to the operating surgeon demonstrated substantial agreement (mean κ = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.31-0.79/rater 1, 0.48-0.89/rater 2; P < .001). Conclusion The interarytenoid assessment protocol appears reliable in describing interarytenoid anatomy. Rapid completion times and substantial interrater/intrarater reliability were demonstrated. Incorporation of this protocol may provide important steps toward improved standardization in the anatomic description of the interarytenoid region in pediatric dysphagia.

By JACEP Open policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist.

Objectives: The clinical significance of the interarytenoid mucosal height (IAMH) in pediatric dysphagia, ranging from normal anatomy to a laryngeal cleft, is unknown. This study seeks to evaluate a cohort of patients who underwent evaluation of their IAMH during microdirect laryngoscopy (MDL) for associations between IAMH and dysphagia as diagnosed on preoperative videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS).Methods: A retrospective case series of 1,351 patients who underwent MDL between 2011 and 2016 were reviewed for intraoperative evaluation of IAMH using our interarytenoid assessment protocol. After exclusions, 182 patients were divided into three groups: 1) thickened diet: VFSS with recommendation for thickened liquids (n = 82 of 182; 45.1%), 2) normal diet: VFSS with allowance of thin liquids (n = 19 of 182; 10.4%), and 3) control: no VFSS performed (n = 81 of 182; 44.5%).Results: There was no difference in IAMH between groups (P = 0.35). Power analysis was able to achieve > 80% power to detect an effect size of ≥ 0.5 (1-5 mucosal height scale). The majority of patients in each group had an IAMH above the false vocal folds (thickened diet: 57.3%, normal diet: 57.9%, control: 64.2%). There were similar percentages of patients in each group with an IAMH at or below the true vocal folds (thickened diet: 4.9%, normal diet: 5.3%, control: 6.1%).Conclusion: There was no significant association between IAMH and preoperative thickened liquid recommendation in this cohort. This data fails to support the hypothesis that the IAMH is an independent etiological factor for pediatric pharyngeal dysphagia. Further studies comparing IAMH with outcomes after feeding therapy and surgery may better clarify this relationship between anatomy and physiology.

Objectives/Hypothesis: Given the costs of healthcare, capitation, and desires for quality improvement (QI), there is a need to better assess healthcare value. Time-driven activity-based costing and the Quadruple Aim have evaluated value by assessing health outcomes and provider experiences relative to costs. The proposed OPPS/Cost method expands on this to examine value for aerodigestive clinic treatment of pediatric persistent pharyngeal dysphagia: O + P 1 + P 2 + S/Cost (O = objective health [video-fluoroscopic swallow study results], P 1 = patient/family experience [Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems], P 2 = provider experience [Copenhagen Burnout Inventory {CBI}], S = subjective health [Feeding/Swallowing-Impact Survey], C = cost [time-driven activity-based costing]).Study Design: Use of QI time data, surveys, and retrospective chart review for 56 patient encounters. Methods: Staff interviews were used to develop process maps, and monetary values were assigned to activities. OPPS/ Cost outcomes were normalized amongst variables, and composite values were calculated. Comparisons were made using a Student t test for pre-and postclinic relocation over a 14-month period.Results: Time reductions were check-in (13 minutes/patient), rooming (21 minutes/patient), and providers (4 minutes/patient). Patient in-room wait time increased (4 minutes/patient). The CBI identified burnout as an area for improvement. OPPS/Cost composite values increased by 14%, with a 1.7% cost reduction, improvement in objective and subjective health outcomes of 47.4% (P < .05) and 7.3%, respectively, and stable patient/family experience.Conclusions: OPPS/Cost is feasible in an interdisciplinary clinic and helped evaluate value during a clinic relocation. The QI opportunities identified are indicative of the potential of OPPS/Cost.

Background Despite studies showing most patients significantly improve their nasal congestion with surgical management of nasal turbinates, not all achieve acceptable results. Rarely, patients report substantial worsening of symptoms leading to litigation risk. Objective Document the United States medicolegal environment for nasal turbinate surgery. Methods We searched the Westlaw database for turbinate related terms for 1987- July 2019, recording demographics, claims, legal arguments, and outcomes in legal cases related to nasal turbinate surgery. We assessed prevalence and correlations with case outcomes. Results Of the 39 cases identified, the most common complaint was nose/facial pain (53.8% of cases). Surgeons prevailed in 87.2% of cases, with total liabilities of $3,224,606 [mean $97,715.3, ±$283,900.8]. Surgeons had statistically significant favorable outcomes when patients claimed dryness, headache, congestion, crusting, breathing problems, and disfigurement (all p < 0.05). Revision surgery was indicated in 23.1% of cases and was claimed in 40.0% of patient awards. Surgical negligence was claimed in 40.0% of patient awards versus 67.9% of surgeon awards (p = 0.333). Lack of informed consent was claimed in 20.0% of patient awards versus 32.1% of surgeon awards (p = 0.601). Conclusions There are inherent litigation risks for surgeons when performing nasal turbinate surgery. Most claims against surgeons, are resolved in favor of the surgeon. Understanding the types of claims and legal arguments that are made by patients could help assessing the risks of a proposed litigation. Documenting clear indications for surgery and written informed consent may reduce litigations against surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often develop acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and receive invasive mechanical ventilation. Much remains unknown about their respiratory mechanics, including the trajectories of pulmonary compliance and P aO 2 /F IO 2 , the prognostic value of these parameters, and the effects of prone positioning. We described respiratory mechanics among subjects with COVID-19 who were intubated during the first month of hospitalization. METHODS: We included patients with COVID-19 who were mechanically ventilated between February and May 2020. Daily values of pulmonary compliance, P aO 2 , F IO 2 , and the use of prone positioning were abstracted from electronic medical records. The trends were analyzed separately over days 1-10 and days 1-35 of intubation, stratified by prone positioning use, survival, and initial P aO 2 /F IO 2 . RESULTS: Among 49 subjects on mechanical ventilation day 1, the mean compliance was 41 mL/cm H 2 O, decreasing to 25 mL/cm H 2 O by day 14, the median duration of mechanical ventilation. In contrast, the P aO 2 /F IO 2 on day 1 was similar to day 14. The overall mean compliance was greater among the non-survivors versus the survivors (27 mL/cm H 2 O vs 24 mL/cm H 2 O; P 5 .005), whereas P aO 2 /F IO 2 was higher among the survivors versus the non-survivors over days 1-10 (159 mm Hg vs 138 mm Hg; P 5 .002) and days 1-35 (175 mm Hg vs 153 mm Hg; P < .001). The subjects who underwent early prone positioning had lower compliance during days 1-10 (27 mL/cm H 2 O vs 33 mL/cm H 2 O; P < .001) and lower P aO 2 /F IO 2 values over days 1-10 (139.9 mm Hg vs 167.4 mm Hg; P < .001) versus those who did not undergo prone positioning. After day 21 of hospitalization, the average compliance of the subjects who had early prone positioning surpassed that of the subjects who did not have prone positioning. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory mechanics of the subjects with COVID-19 who were on mechanical ventilation were characterized by persistently low respiratory system compliance and P aO 2 /F IO 2 , similar to ARDS due to other etiologies. The P aO 2 /F IO 2 was more tightly associated with mortality than with compliance.

No abstract