Since the initial discovery of replication protein A (RPA) as a DNA replication factor, much progress has been made on elucidating critical roles for RPA in other DNA metabolic pathways. RPA has been shown to be required for DNA replication, DNA repair, DNA recombination, and the DNA damage response pathway with roles in checkpoint activation. This review summarizes the current understanding of RPA structure, phosphorylation and protein-protein interactions in mediating these DNA metabolic processes.

Restarting stalled replication forks partly depends on the breakinduced recombination pathway, in which a DNA doublestranded break (DSB) is created on the stalled replication fork to initiate the downstream recombination cascades. Singlestranded DNA gaps accumulating on stalled replication forks are potential targets for endonucleases to generate DSBs. However, it is unclear how this process is executed and which nucleases are involved in eukaryotic cells. Here, we identify a novel gap endonuclease (GEN) activity of human flap endonuclease 1 (FEN-1), critical in resolving stalled replication fork. In response to replication arrest, FEN-1 interacts specifically with Werner syndrome protein for efficient fork cleavage. Replication protein A facilitates FEN-1 interaction with DNA bubble structures. Human FEN-1, but not the GEN-deficient mutant, E178A, was shown to rescue the defect in resistance to UV and camptothecin in a yeast FEN-1 null mutant.

The heterotrimeric DNA-binding protein, replication protein A (RPA), consists of 70-, 34-, and 14-kDa subunits and is involved in maintaining genomic stability by playing key roles in DNA replication, repair, and recombination. RPA participates in these processes through its interaction with other proteins and its strong affinity for single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). RPA-p34 is phosphorylated in a cell-cycle-dependent fashion primarily at Ser-29 and Ser-23, which are consensus sites for Cdc2 cyclin-dependent kinase. By systematically examining RPA-p34 phosphorylation throughout the cell cycle, we have found there are distinct phosphorylated forms of RPA-p34 in different cell-cycle stages. We have isolated and purified a unique phosphorylated form of RPA that is specifically associated with the mitotic phase of the cell cycle. The mitotic form of RPA (m-hRPA) shows no difference in ssDNA binding activity as compared with recombinant RPA (r-hRPA), yet binds less efficiently to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). These data suggest that mitotic phosphorylation of RPA-p34 inhibits the destabilization of dsDNA by RPA complex, thereby decreasing the binding affinity for dsDNA. The m-hRPA also exhibits altered interactions with certain DNA replication and repair proteins. Using highly purified proteins, m-hRPA exhibited decreased binding to ATM, DNA pol alpha, and DNA-PK as compared to unphosphorylated recombinant RPA (r-hRPA). Dephosphorylation of m-hRPA was able to restore the interaction with each of these proteins. Interestingly, the interaction of RPA with XPA was not altered by RPA phosphorylation. These data suggest that phosphorylation of RPA-p34 plays an important role in regulating RPA functions in DNA metabolism by altering specific protein-protein interactions.

Translesion synthesis past Pt-DNA adducts can affect both the cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of the platinum adducts. We have shown previously that the extent of replicative bypass in vivo is influenced by the carrier ligand of platinum adducts. The specificity of replicative bypass may be determined by the DNA polymerase complexes that catalyze translesion synthesis past Pt-DNA adducts and/or by DNA damage-recognition proteins that bind to the Pt-DNA adducts and block translesion replication. In the present study, primer extension on DNA templates containing site-specifically placed cisplatin, oxaliplatin, JM216, or chlorodiethylenetriamine-Pt adducts revealed that the eukaryotic DNA polymerases beta, zeta, gamma, and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase (HIV-1 RT) had a similar specificity for translesion synthesis past Pt-DNA adducts (dien >> oxaliplatin >/= cisplatin > JM216). Primer extension assays performed in the presence of high mobility group protein 1 (HMG1), which is known to recognize cisplatin-damaged DNA, revealed that inhibition of translesion synthesis by HMG1 also depended on the carrier ligand of the Pt-DNA adduct (cisplatin > oxaliplatin = JM216 >> dien). These data were consistent with the results of gel-shift experiments showing similar differences in the affinity of HMG1 for DNA modified with the different platinum adducts. Our studies show that both DNA polymerases and damage-recognition proteins can impart specificity to replicative bypass of Pt-DNA adducts. This information may serve as a model for further studies of translesion synthesis.