MSS progresses despite treatment with currently available antispastic agents, and it is associated with a high level of disability. Spasticity treatment represents a minor element of the overall cost of managing MSS patients in Spain. The approach to the assessment of spasticity varies between centers.

Despite significant advances in the day-to-day management of patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantations, including the introduction of new antiviral drugs, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this article is to undertake a literature-based review of foscarnet in this therapeutic setting and to align current best-published evidence with recent recommendations presented at the European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia. Ganciclovir remains the mainstay of CMV infection/disease antiviral management protocols. However, approximately a third of patients develop severe neutropenia and others become resistant to ganciclovir, and thus, a reasonably large proportion of patients are not able to receive and/or continue with this medication. Foscarnet is a suitable option as both pre-emptive therapy or for the treatment of active disease in these patients. Randomized trials have demonstrated that foscarnet is equally effective when compared with ganciclovir for pre-emptive treatment of CMV infections: the outcome was comparable with ganciclovir in terms of control of antigenemia and survival rates. There is a paucity of information for its use in the prophylaxis of CMV, although preliminary data show that it was effective in some patients at high risk of CMV reactivation. The main adverse events associated with foscarnet are renal impairment, serum electrolyte and hemoglobin disturbances, seizures and local genital irritation/ulceration. Foscarnet is a well-established antiviral option in immunocompromised patients, and it is usually administered as a second-line option to ganciclovir. In patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, it has proven efficacy when used pre-emptively to treat CMV reactivation, as an alternative to and also in combination with ganciclovir.

Urogenital disorders associated with oestrogen deficiency affect many women throughout menopausal transition. Symptoms such as vaginal dryness, burning, pruritus, dyspareunia, urinary tract urgency/frequency and incontinence have a significant impact on the individual's quality of life. For younger and healthy menopausal women, systemic oestrogen replacement may improve both vasomotor and urogenital symptoms and will be the treatment of choice. However, a proportion of women on systemic therapy still experience symptoms associated with urogenital atrophy, and patients with oestrogen-dependent cancers may be at risk from systemic oestrogen replacement. For women with mainly urogenital symptoms, local oestrogen is a logical choice and it is often more effective than systemic hormone replacement therapy. Generally speaking, there are no contraindications to local therapy. In terms of which topical preparation to use, a wide range of products are available. Promestriene is an analogue of oestradiol which is minimally absorbed and it has been shown to be effective in reversing atrophic changes caused by oestrogen deficiency in women undergoing natural or surgically induced menopause. Given the absence of systemic activity, promestriene may be a good choice in women requiring purely locally oestrogen, and those who have survived, or who are at risk of breast cancer and who have severe vulvo-vaginal symptoms.

Summary Aims:  The benefits of taking almotriptan early for acute migraine when pain is mild have clearly been demonstrated in the neurology setting. The aim of this study was to determine whether similar benefits with early intervention of almotriptan can be achieved in everyday general practice, where most migraineurs are managed. Methods:  In this European, prospective, observational study, patients were asked to treat up to three migraine attacks over a 2‐month period with almotriptan 12.5 mg administered within 1 h of pain onset and when pain was mild (early + mild intervention group). Results:  A total of 501 patients were enrolled in primary care centres across Spain, France and Italy. The intention‐to‐treat analysis involved 454 patients who reported 1174 migraine attacks, with early intervention being used in 138 of these attacks. A greater proportion of patients who took almotriptan early + mild for their first migraine attack (n = 42) were pain free at 2 h compared with those in the non‐early + mild intervention group (n = 410) (62% vs. 35%; p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained for all migraine attacks comparison [65% (n = 138) vs. 38% (n = 1036); p < 0.001]. Other secondary end‐points were also significantly in favour of early + mild treatment, including sustained pain free (SPF), SPF with no adverse events (SNAE), and time lost because of migraine (all p < 0.001). Almotriptan was well tolerated with no serious adverse events reported. Conclusions:  In the primary care setting, early intervention with almotriptan for treatment of migraine provides significant clinical benefits compared with delaying treatment and/or waiting until pain intensity has progressed beyond mild.

No abstract

Introduction:Diabetes is a chronic disease associated with high morbidity and mortality, which represents a major public health concern. Interventions that can enhance patient care and reduce clinic visits will not only relieve some of this burden, they will also improve patient QOL and wellbeing.Aims:This review assesses the evidence for the use of insulin glargine in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.Evidence review:Once-daily insulin glargine has a prolonged, peakless activity profile, making it a candidate as a long-acting (basal) insulin. In combination with bolus insulin to cover prandial glucose surges, it facilitates a more physiologic approach to patient management. Evidence from large, randomized, controlled clinical trials in patients with type 1 diabetes has confirmed its effectiveness and tolerability relative to neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) insulin, with a tendency toward causing less hypoglycemia. In patients with type 2 diabetes requiring insulin therapy, once-daily insulin glargine has proven to be clinically superior to NPH insulin in terms of providing at least as effective glycemic control, but with significantly fewer episodes of nocturnal hypoglycemia. A variety of economic analyses have confirmed the cost effectiveness of insulin glargine in type 1 and type 2 diabetes and in particular it was shown to be significantly superior to NPH insulin.Clinical value:Insulin glargine has established itself as a first-line choice in patients with type 1 diabetes, including children (>6 years) and adolescents, and is a recommended treatment option. In patients with type 2 diabetes it is clearly associated with less hypoglycemia than NPH insulin, and this may help overcome one of the major barriers to starting insulin therapy in this class of patient. Thus, insulin glargine is a valuable addition to the therapeutic armamentarium available to physicians and it has the potential to significantly improve the quality of life of patients with diabetes.

No abstract