Summary The Granite Wash unconventional gas and oil play of the US midcontinent has a multitrillion-cubic-feet-equivalent upside potential. The condensates and natural-gas liquids associated with this gas play make it one of the most-prolific and fastest-growing unconventional fields in North America. However, efficient extraction of hydrocarbons from the Granite Wash play poses drilling and geological challenges. The Granite Wash deposit has significant lateral variation, with extremely abrasive thinly bedded sandstones. Geological complexity of this field requires precise placement and navigation of the wellbore in real time to overcome the variable characteristics of the reservoir. To overcome these challenges, logging-while-drilling (LWD) technology was used in conjunction with geosteering. An azimuthal gamma ray image was used to determine formation bed dip and stratigraphic complexity within the reservoir. Multiple-propagation resistivity measurements were used to correlate position within the reservoir and indicate formation porosity. The LWD data was transmitted in real time by means of satellite to a remote reservoir-navigation center where the reservoir-navigation engineer incorporated the real-time data into the geological model. This strategy has been implemented to drill with excellent results, as compared with the offset wells. The initial production rate obtained was 19.4 MMcfe/D (cfe = cubic foot equivalent). The well was completed 10 days ahead of schedule, resulting in significant cost savings. With the successful implementation of real-time reservoir-navigation and drilling technology, the operator accelerated their drilling program. The results are significant organic production growth, improved drilling performance, precise placement of the wellbore, and significant reduction in rotating hours at lower drilling and production costs.
The Barnett Shale field of North Texas is one of the most prolific and fastest growing natural gas fields in North America with a multi-trillion cubic feet equivalent upside potential. However, the area presents numerous drilling challenges. In the vertical section, roller cone bits had unacceptable low penetration rates while PDC bits suffered premature damage. High torque and drag along with low penetration rates hampered drilling the curve and lateral sections. To address these challenges, a detailed engineering analysis was performed utilizing sophisticated BHA and drill string modeling software. Engineers studied offset wells and drillstring modeling including buckling load analysis, critical speed analysis, and torque and drag analysis. As a result of the study, engineers determined that bit whirl and stick-slip were resulting in premature bit damage and reduced ROP while drillstring buckling resulted in inefficient transfer of weight on bit. Modeling helped design a BHA that mitigated buckling while optimized drilling parameters avoided critical speeds. The improvements resulted in 42% to 121% higher penetration rates with minimal damage to the PDC bits. The 8¬3/4" vertical section was drilled in one PDC run in 60 out of 104 wells resulting in significant reduction in rotating hours and average cost per foot. The new BHA reduced drillstring buckling and significantly reduced torque and drag while drilling the curve and lateral sections. The authors will describe the significance of applying principles of buckling load and torque and drag analysis; to design technically sound BHA's. They will also discuss how to utilize drillstring dynamics to avoid critical speeds. Introduction Low porosity along with other geological/lithological challenges has hampered the efficient extraction of natural gas from the Barnett Shale for over 40 years. During the last several years, the operator has been utilizing fracturing technology which has significantly increased production in the field.[1] Drilling lateral sections further enhanced production/economics in the region (Figure 1). On an average, a horizontal well produces triple the cubic feet of gas compared to a vertical well at only twice the cost. Building on this success, the operator contacted a leading service provider to identify opportunities for improving drilling performance. To meet the operator's aggressive drilling schedule and achieve performance improvement, the team developed a strategy that included optimizing drilling methods to improve horizontal well delivery time. The goal was to achieve a significant increase in ROP drilling the vertical, curve, and lateral intervals. Geological Background The Fort Worth Basin (Figure 2), is a shallow, north-south elongated trough encompassing approximately 15,000 square miles in north-central Texas.[2] The basin is bounded on the north, northeast, and east by faulted basement uplifts of the Red River Arch, the Muenster Arch, and the Ouachita Structural Front. The southern limit is defined by the Llano Uplift.[2] To the west, the basin shallows onto the positive feature of the Bend Arch. The Fort Basin contains a maximum of 12,000 feet of sedimentary section in its deepest area adjacent to the Muenster Arch.[2] In this area, the Barnett section can reach a thickness greater than 1,000 feet.[2] In the core area (Figure 3) of the Newark East Barnett Shale Field, the Barnett shale is encased by tight carbonates which act as fracture barriers during the completion process.[2] A typical stratigraphic column of the Fort Worth basin is depicted in Figure 4. Drilling Optimization Process Structure Drilling optimization has resulted in significant improvements in drilling performance in the region.[3–5] The structure of the drilling optimization process followed by the service company is show in Figure 5. This process is comprised of four phases: pre-project, planning, drilling, and post-well. Each phase consists of clearly defined steps and peer review Figure 5.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.