Drawing on the notion that revision involves the performance of a writer’s identity in a conversation with herself, this article argues for conceptualizing revision as ecstasis and ventriloquism. By using the metaphor of ventriloquism to translate theory into heuristics for teaching revision, it enacts an underlying argument that pedagogy is metaphor. In doing so, it offers four practical strategies for teaching students to revise.
Harold Bloom's How to Read and Why (2000) came as a surprise. Twenty-five years earlier, his insightful and theoretically informed A Map of Misreading (1975) had begun to shape a generation of powerful scholarship on reading, writing, and pedagogy. After Bloom's provocative and enabling notion that all readings are "misreadings" but that some misreadings are stronger because they enable new work to be produced by the reader (who is always-already a writer), How to Read heralds either a retrenchment or an exercise in willful amnesia. Bloom writes for a reader who wants to share in what he calls "the restoration of reading" (2000: 25), reading having apparently been destroyed by universities that teach "supermarket fiction" (196) and thereby sacrifice pleasure for the sake of ideology or social reform. Instead, Bloom argues, we should read for ourselves only: for pleasure, wisdom, and healing and to prepare ourselves for change and death. The book seems to be written for a translucent reader who is, impossibly, untouched by ideology and located at an impossible time.I call this kind of reading pure reading because it invokes a series of deeply rooted atemporal utopian impulses, and here I argue instead for an impure, located, deeply temporal notion of reading. Pure reading imagines that the act of reading is truly (at its lost but recoverable roots) for upliftment and solitary pleasure unstained by any current social forces of marketing, ideology, theory, or schooling. Like all utopian concepts, pure reading places the reader in an impossible time by invoking change but circumventing any
To build on the legacy of reader-response theory, English studies needs to destabilize the foundational binary separation of reading and writing by creating stronger intradisciplinary relations between composition and literary studies. English studies professors can do so by foregrounding the hybridity and performativity of the texts they teach and study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.