New Zealand (NZ) has low immunization coverage for a Western country. Media coverage, including views and content expressed on editorial pages, can affect immunization uptake both positively and negatively. The objectives of this research were to analyze the content of written media in 2001 and 2003 throughout NZ in terms of vaccination and vaccine preventable diseases from a supporting, neutral, or opposing perspective; how vaccination and vaccine-preventable diseases are presented to their target audiences; and changes over time with possible influences on these changes. Print media clippings were analyzed from 400 national publications in 2001 and 2003 for references to immunization and vaccine-preventable diseases. Articles were coded as supportive, neutral, or opposing immunization. During two 12-month periods, 2,113 articles, including letters to the editor and opinion columns were analyzed: 1,228 from 2001; and 885 from 2003. Thirty-three percent (704) were classified as "supportive," 17% (362) as "opposing," and 51% (1,081) as "neutral." Articles and perspectives in the media opposed to immunization were significantly more plentiful in 2001 than in 2003 (328/1,228; 27% vs. 34/885; 4% of all immunization media; chi(2) = 189.46; p = <0.0001; df = 1). References to specific vaccines and disease were examined. During this study period there were high-profile infectious disease and vaccine issues that may have shaped the differences observed in the media clippings. This study indicates an overall positive trend toward reduction in alarmist anti-immunization messages in media. Strategies implemented by the Immunization Advisory Centre to counter misinformation may have contributed to reduction in anti-immunization messages.
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to identify the percentage of patients that were transferred from rural hospitals and who received an investigation or intervention at an urban hospital that was not readily available at the rural hospital.MethodsA retrospective observational study.DesignPatients were randomly selected and clinical records were reviewed. Patient demographic and clinical information was collected, including any interventions or investigations occurring at the urban referral hospital. These were compared against the resources available at the rural hospitals.SettingSix New Zealand (NZ) rural hospitals were included.ParticipantsPatients that were transferred from a rural hospital to an urban hospital between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 December 2019 were included.Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients who received an investigation or intervention that was not available at the rural hospital.ResultsThere were 584 patients included. Overall 73% of patients received an intervention or investigation that was not available at the rural hospital. Of the six rural hospitals, there was one outlier, where only 37% of patients transferred from that hospital received an investigation or intervention that was not available rurally. Patients were most commonly referred to general medicine (23%) and general surgery (18%). Of the investigations or interventions performed, 43% received a CT scan and 25% underwent surgery.ConclusionsMost patients that are transferred to urban hospitals receive an intervention or investigation that was not available at the rural hospital.
Introduction There is considerable variation in the structure and resources of New Zealand (NZ) rural hospitals; however, these have not been recently quantified and their effects on healthcare outcomes are poorly understood. Importantly, there is no standardised description of each rural hospital’s catchment boundary and the characteristics of the population living within this area. Aim To define and describe a catchment population for each of New Zealand’s rural hospitals. Methods An exploratory approach to developing catchments was employed. Geographic Information Systems were used to develop drive-time-based geographic catchments, and administrative health data (National Minimum Data Set and Primary Health Organisation Data Set) informed service utilisation-based catchments. Catchments were defined at both the Statistical Area 2 (SA2) and domicile levels, and linked to census-based population data, the Geographic Classification for Health, and the area-level New Zealand Index of Socioeconomic Deprivation (NZDep2018). Results Our results highlight considerable heterogeneity in the size (max: 57 564, min: 5226) and characteristics of populations served by rural hospitals. Substantial differences in the age structure, ethnic composition, socio-economic profile, ‘remoteness’ and projected future populations, are noted. Discussion In providing a standardised description of each rural hospital’s catchment boundary and its population characteristics, the considerable heterogeneity of the communities served by rural hospitals, both in size, rurality and socio-demographic characteristics, is highlighted. The findings provide a platform on which to build further research regarding NZ’s rural hospitals and inform the delivery of high-quality, cost-effective and equitable health care for people living in rural NZ.
No abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.