The use of immunotherapies for the treatment of brain tumors is a topic that has garnered considerable excitement in recent years. Discoveries such as the presence of a glymphatic system and immune surveillance in the central nervous system (CNS) have shattered the theory of immune privilege and opened up the possibility of treating CNS malignancies with immunotherapies. However, despite many immunotherapy clinical trials aimed at treating glioblastoma (GBM), very few have demonstrated a significant survival benefit. Several factors for this have been identified, one of which is that GBMs are immunologically “cold,” implying that the cancer does not induce a strong T cell response. It is postulated that this is why clinical trials using an immune checkpoint inhibitor alone have not demonstrated efficacy. While it is well established that anti-cancer T cell responses can be facilitated by the presentation of tumor-specific antigens to the immune system, treatment-related death of GBM cells and subsequent release of molecules have not been shown to be sufficient to evoke an anti-tumor immune response effective enough to have a significant impact. To overcome this limitation, vaccines can be used to introduce exogenous antigens at higher concentrations to the immune system to induce strong tumor antigen-specific T cell responses. In this review, we will describe vaccination strategies that are under investigation to treat GBM; categorizing them based on their target antigens, form of antigens, vehicles used, and pairing with specific adjuvants. We will review the concept of vaccine therapy in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors, as it is hypothesized that this approach may be more effective in overcoming the immunosuppressive milieu of GBM. Clinical trial design and the need for incorporating robust immune monitoring into future studies will also be discussed here. We believe that the integration of evolving technologies of vaccine development, delivery, and immune monitoring will further enhance the role of these therapies and will likely remain an important area of investigation for future treatment strategies for GBM patients.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the field of cancer immunotherapy. Most commonly, inhibitors of PD-1 and CTLA4 are used having received approval for treatment of many cancers like melanoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), and leukemia. In contrast, to date clinical studies conducted in patients with central nervous system (CNS) malignancies have not demonstrated promising results. However, patients with CNS malignancies have several underlying factors such as treatment with supportive medications like corticosteroids and cancer therapies including radiation and chemotherapy that may negatively impact response to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). Although many clinical trials have been conducted with ICIs, measures that reproducibly and reliably indicate that treatment has evoked an effective immune response have not been fully developed. In this article, we will review the history of ICI therapy and the correlative biology that has been performed in the clinical trials testing these therapies in different cancers. It is our aim to help provide an overview of the assays that may be used to gauge immunologic response. This may be particularly germane for CNS tumors where there is currently a great need for predictive biomarkers that will allow for the selection of patients with the highest likelihood of responding.
Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain malignancy with a dismal prognosis. With emerging evidence to disprove brain-immune privilege, there has been much interest in examining immunotherapy strategies to treat central nervous system (CNS) cancers. Unfortunately, the limited success of clinical studies investigating immunotherapy regimens, has led to questions about the suitability of immunotherapy for these cancers. Inadequate inherent populations of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and limited trafficking of systemic, circulating T cells into the CNS likely contribute to the poor response to immunotherapy. This paucity of TILs is in concert with the finding of epigenetic silencing of genes that promote immune cell movement (chemotaxis) to the tumor. In this study we evaluated the ability of GSK126, a blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeable small molecule inhibitor of EZH2, to reverse GBM immune evasion by epigenetic suppression of T cell chemotaxis. We also evaluated the in vivo efficacy of this drug in combination with anti-PD-1 treatment on tumor growth, survival and T cell infiltration in syngeneic mouse models. GSK126 reversed H3K27me3 in murine and human GBM cell lines. When combined with anti-PD-1 treatment, a significant increase in activated T cell infiltration into the tumor was observed. This resulted in decreased tumor growth and enhanced survival both in sub-cutaneous and intracranial tumors of immunocompetent, syngeneic murine models of GBM. Additionally, a significant increase in CXCR3+ T cells was also seen in the draining lymph nodes, suggesting their readiness to migrate to the tumor. Closer examination of the mechanism of action of GSK126 revealed its ability to promote the expression of IFN-γ driven chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 from the tumor cells, that work to traffic T cells without directly affecting T maturation and/or proliferation. The loss of survival benefit either with single agent or combination in immunocompromised SCID mice, suggest that the therapeutic efficacy of GSK126 in GBM is primarily driven by lymphocytes. Taken together, our data suggests that in glioblastoma, epigenetic modulation using GSK126 could improve current immunotherapy strategies by reversing the epigenetic changes that enable immune cell evasion leading to enhanced immune cell trafficking to the tumor.
Cancer stem cells are thought to be the main drivers of tumorigenesis for malignancies such as glioblastoma (GBM). They are maintained through a close relationship with the tumor vasculature. Previous literature has well-characterized the components and signaling pathways for maintenance of this stem cell niche, but details on how the niche initially forms are limited. This review discusses development of the nonmalignant neural and hematopoietic stem cell niches in order to draw important parallels to the malignant environment. We then discuss what is known about the cancer stem cell niche, its relationship with angiogenesis, and provide a hypothesis for its development in GBM. A better understanding of the mechanisms of development of the tumor stem cell niche may provide new insights to potentially therapeutically exploit.
Brain tumors are one of the leading causes of cancer related death in both the adult and pediatric patient population. Gliomas represent a cohort of brain tumors derived from glial cell lineages which include astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas and glioblastomas (GBMs). These tumors are known to grow aggressively and have a high lethality with GBM being the most aggressive tumor in this group. Currently, few treatment options exist for GBM outside of surgical resection, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. While these measures have been shown to marginally improve patient survival, patients, especially those diagnosed with GBM, often experience a recurrence of their disease. Following disease recurrence, treatment options become more limited as additional surgical resections can pose life threatening risk to the patient, patients may be ineligible for additional radiation, and the recurrent tumor may be resistant to chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the field of cancer immunotherapy as many patients with cancers residing outside the central nervous system (CNS) have experienced a survival benefit from this treatment modality. It has often been observed that this survival benefit is increased following neoadjuvant administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors as tumor antigen is still present in the patient which enables a more robust anti-tumor immune response. Interestingly, results for ICI-based studies for patients with GBM have been largely disappointing which is a stark contrast from the success this treatment modality has had in non-central nervous system cancers. In this review, we will discuss the various benefits of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition such as how this approach reduces tumor burden and allows for a greater induction of an anti-tumor immune response. Additionally, we will discuss several non-CNS cancers where neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition has been successful and discuss why we believe this approach may provide a survival benefit for GBM patients. We hope this manuscript will foster future studies aimed at exploring whether this approach may be beneficial for patients diagnosed with GBM.
Background Pediatric high-grade gliomas (HGGs) are one of the deadliest brain tumors that arise in children, with an average five-year survival for this disease being less than 20%. 1 HGGs expresses glioma-associated antigens (GAAs) which can be targeted by the immune system. These include Survivin, and EphA2 [2]. Previously, our research group conducted a clinical trial where HLA-A2 positive pediatric patients were vaccinated with these GAA epitopes when newly diagnosed with HGG [2]. Our group observed many patients enrolled in the study showed positive anti-GAA immune responses to IL-13Ra2, EphA2, and Survivin. The findings from this trial highlighted that the sparsity of T-cells within the tumor microenvironment may pose a major challenge to improving immuno-therapeutic outcomes. Methods In this study we engaged in identifying TCR sequences targeted to IL-13Ra2, Survivin, or EphA2. To accomplish this, a single cell-suspension of CD8 T-cells tetramer stained for Survivin, IL13Ra2, or EphA2 were obtained using FACS from PBMCS taken from individual patients who underwent vaccination. Single-cell RNA-sequencing (ScRNA-Seq) was performed on these samples to determine the phenotype of the T-cells. We also assessed T-Cell expansion and obtained the nucleotide sequence for the CDR3 region. Following acquisition of the nucleotide sequence, we developed retroviral TCRvectors and viral particles to enable transduction of T cells. We confirmed the presence of TCRs on the T-cell surface via tetramer staining and flow cytometric analysis. We then performed in vitro killing assays by co-culturing transduced Tcells with U87 cells and assessed for LDH within our samples. Results ScRNA-seq allowed us to identify a cluster of T-cells consisting of PRF1+ (Perforin) & GZMB+ (Granzyme b), as well as a cluster of PDCD1+ (PD-1) & TIGIT+ cells. Our tetramer staining confirmed the presence of our TCRs on the T-cell surface. In vitro killing assays demonstrated T-cell cytotoxicity as T-cells with U87 cells in 10:1, 4:1 and 1:1 ratios had a percentage cytotoxicity of 30.95%, 22.59% and 9.37% respectively. When pairing T-cells with U87 cells while blocking HLA-A2, there was a marginal decrease in cytotoxicity. Conclusions TCRs targeted to IL-13Ra2, Survivin, or EphA2 were positively identified on the surface of transduced T-cells and demonstrated a cytotoxic response during in vitro killing assays. We now intend to grow these cells into large numbers and adoptively transfer them into tumor-bearing mice in hopes this will provide a survival benefit.
Gliomas have an extremely poor prognosis in both adult and pediatric patient populations as these tumors are known to grow aggressively and respond poorly to standard of care treatment. Currently, treatment for gliomas involves surgical resection followed by chemoradiation therapy. However, some gliomas, such as diffuse midline glioma, have more limited treatment options such as radiotherapy alone. Even with these interventions, the prognosis for those diagnosed with a glioma remains poor. Immunotherapy is highly effective for some cancers and there is great interest in the development of effective immunotherapies for the treatment of gliomas. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of immunotherapies targeted to gliomas have largely failed to date, and we believe this is partially due to the poor choice in pre-clinical mouse models that are used to evaluate these immunotherapies. A key consideration in evaluating new immunotherapies is the selection of pre-clinical models that mimic the glioma-immune response in humans. Multiple pre-clinical options are currently available, each one with their own benefits and limitations. Informed selection of pre-clinical models for testing can facilitate translation of more promising immunotherapies in the clinical setting. In this review we plan to present glioma cell lines and mouse models, as well as alternatives to mouse models, that are available for pre-clinical glioma immunotherapy studies. We plan to discuss considerations of model selection that should be made for future studies as we hope this review can serve as a guide for investigators as they choose which model is best suited for their study.
Chordomas are a locally invasive, low-grade, CNS malignancy that are primarily found in the skull base, spine, and sacrum. They are thought to be derived from notochordal remnants and remain a significant clinical challenge due to their local invasiveness, resistance to chemoradiation, and difficulty in achieving a complete resection. Adjuvant therapy such as proton beam therapy is critical in preventing recurrence in patients who are at high risk, however this treatment is associated with increased risk of complication. Currently, intraoperative observation and imaging findings are used to determine recurrence and success of gross total resection. These methods can be unreliable due to limited operative view, bony and soft tissue involvement, and complex post-operative changes on MRI. Earlier detection of incomplete resection or recurrence will allow for earlier ability to intervene and potentially improve patient outcomes. Circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) is cell-free DNA that is released by tumor cells as they undergo cellular turn-over. Monitoring ctDNA has been shown to be more sensitive at predicting residual tumor than imaging in numerous solid malignancies. Furthermore, ctDNA could be detected earlier in peripheral blood as opposed to imaging changes, allowing for earlier intervention. In this review, we intend to give a brief overview of the current state of molecular diagnosis for skull base chordomas. We will then discuss current advances in the utilization of ctDNA for the management of CNS pathologies such as glioblastoma (GBM) and brain metastases. We will also discuss the role ctDNA has in the management of non-CNS pathologies such as osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma (EWS). Finally, we will discuss potential implications of ctDNA monitoring for chordoma management.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.