SUMMARY Signaling through RAS/MAP kinase pathway is central to biology. ERK has long been perceived as the only substrate for MEK. Herein we report that HSF1, the master regulator of the proteotoxic stress response, is a new MEK substrate. Beyond mediating cell-environment interactions, the MEK-HSF1 regulation impacts malignancy. In tumor cells, MEK blockade inactivates HSF1 and thereby provokes proteomic chaos, presented as protein destabilization, aggregation, and, strikingly, amyloidogenesis. Unlike their non-transformed counterparts, tumor cells are particularly susceptible to proteomic perturbation and amyloid induction. Amyloidogenesis is tumor-suppressive, reducing in vivo melanoma growth and contributing to the potent anti-neoplastic effects of proteotoxic stressors. Our findings unveil a key biological function of the oncogenic RAS-MEK signaling in guarding proteostasis and suppressing amyloidogenesis. Thus, proteomic instability is an intrinsic feature of malignant state and, disrupting the fragile tumor proteostasis to promote amyloidogenesis may be a feasible therapeutic strategy.

Proteomic instability is causally related to human diseases. In guarding proteome stability, the heat shock factor 1 (HSF1)-mediated proteotoxic stress response plays a pivotal role. Contrasting with its beneficial role of enhancing cell survival, recent findings have revealed a compelling pro-oncogenic role for HSF1. However, the mechanisms underlying the persistent activation and function of HSF1 within malignancy remain poorly understood. Emerging evidence reveals that oncogenic signaling mobilizes HSF1 and that cancer cells rely on HSF1 to avert proteomic instability and repress tumor-suppressive amyloidogenesis. In aggregate, these new developments suggest that cancer cells endure chronic proteotoxic stress and that proteomic instability is intrinsically associated with malignant state, a characteristic that could be exploited to combat cancer.

To cope with proteotoxic stress, cells attenuate protein synthesis. However, the precise mechanisms underlying this fundamental adaptation remain poorly defined. Here we report that mTORC1 acts as an immediate cellular sensor of proteotoxic stress. Surprisingly, the multifaceted stress-responsive kinase JNK constitutively associates with mTORC1 under normal growth conditions. Upon activation by proteotoxic stress, JNK phosphorylates both RAPTOR at Ser863 and mTOR at Ser567, causing partial disintegration of mTORC1 and subsequent translation inhibition. Importantly, HSF1, the central player in the proteotoxic stress response (PSR), preserves mTORC1 integrity and function by inactivating JNK, independently of its canonical transcriptional action. Thereby, HSF1 translationally augments the PSR. Beyond promoting stress resistance, this intricate HSF1-JNK-mTORC1 interplay, strikingly, regulates cell, organ and body sizes. Thus, these results illuminate a unifying mechanism that controls stress adaptation and growth.

Numerous extrinsic and intrinsic insults trigger the HSF1-mediated proteotoxic stress response (PSR), an ancient transcriptional program that is essential to proteostasis and survival under such conditions. In contrast to its well-recognized mobilization by proteotoxic stress, little is known about how this powerful adaptive mechanism reacts to other stresses. Surprisingly, we discovered that metabolic stress suppresses the PSR. This suppression is largely mediated through the central metabolic sensor AMPK, which physically interacts with and phosphorylates HSF1 at Ser121. Through AMPK activation, metabolic stress represses HSF1, rendering cells vulnerable to proteotoxic stress. Conversely, proteotoxic stress inactivates AMPK and thereby interferes with the metabolic stress response. Importantly, metformin, a metabolic stressor and popular anti-diabetic drug, inactivates HSF1 and provokes proteotoxic stress within tumor cells, thereby impeding tumor growth. Thus, these findings uncover a novel interplay between the metabolic stress sensor AMPK and the proteotoxic stress sensor HSF1 that profoundly impacts stress resistance, proteostasis, and malignant growth.

Dopamine D 2 receptor (DRD2) is important for normal function of the brain reward circuit. Lower DRD2 function in the brain increases the risk for substance abuse, obesity, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and depression. Moreover, DRD2 is the target of most antipsychotics currently in use. It is well known that dopamine-induced DRD2 endocytosis is important for its desensitization. However, it remains controversial whether DRD2 is recycled back to the plasma membrane or targeted for degradation following dopamine stimulation. Here, we used total internal reflection fluorescent microscopy (TIRFM) to image DRD2 with a superecliptic pHluorin tagged to its N terminus. With these technical advances, we were able to directly visualize vesicular insertion events of DRD2 in cultured mouse striatal medium spiny neurons. We showed that insertion of DRD2 occurs on neuronal somatic and dendritic surfaces. Lateral diffusion of DRD2 was observed following its insertion. Most importantly, using our new approach, we uncovered two functionally distinct recycling pathways for DRD2: a constitutive recycling pathway and a dopamine activity-dependent recycling pathway. We further demonstrated that Rab4 plays an important role in constitutive DRD2 recycling, while Rab11 is required for dopamine activitydependent DRD2 recycling. Finally, we demonstrated that the two DRD2 recycling pathways play distinct roles in determining DRD2 function: the Rab4-sensitive constitutive DRD2 recycling pathway determines steady-state surface expression levels of DRD2, whereas the Rab11-sensitive dopamine activity-dependent DRD2 recycling pathway is important for functional resensitization of DRD2. Our findings underscore the significance of endosomal recycling in regulation of DRD2 function.