Three experiments investigated the effect of age and degree of learning on short-term retention (up to 24 hr.) of one-way active-avoidance learning. Following training to a single avoidance, rats aged 25 days or older uniformly showed poorer retention after intermediate retention intervals (1 or 4 hr.) than immediately after training (5-10 min.) or later (24 hr.), i.e., a "Kamin effect." This effect was not observed with younger Ss previously trained to a single avoidance. With increased level of original training, the Kamin effect was present in rats aged 15-18 days. Fear-based hormonal explanations of this effect may be inadequate in view of the apparently underdeveloped hormonal system at this age.Recently there has been a revival of interest in retention as a function of age. Kirby (1963) demonstrated that the retention of an active-avoidance response for 25-day-old Ss was equal to that of 50and 100-day-old Ss on a 24-hr, test but was inferior to that of older Ss on 25and 50-day tests. These age-related retentional differences found only after intervals longer than 24 hr. have been reproduced in escape learning (Smith, 1963), fear conditioning (Campbell & Campbell, 1962), and discrimination learning (Campbell, 1967; Campbell, Jaynes, & Misanin, 1968;Smith, 1968). However, there may be some situations in which there are age differences at retention intervals of 24 hr. or less; for example, rats younger than those tested in the previous studies might show retention differences on a 24-hr, test.An age-dependent "Kamin effect" must also be considered as a possible source of performance differences on short-term retention tests. The Kamin effect consists of an initial decrement in avoidance per-
Four studies were conducted to explore the effects of unpaired lithium chloride (LiCl) injections, the unconditioned stimulus (US), on the acquisition and retention of a taste aversion. In Experiment 1, subjects were preexposed to a US; for one group the US was paired with a distinctive taste, whereas for a second group it was not. Following this preparation, both groups received the US paired with a novel taste. Only the US-alone group showed a retardation of subsequent taste-aversion conditioning. Experiment 2 indicated that an exposure to LiCl without a specific gustatory cue will interfere with the avoidance of a specific taste, regardless of whether the US experience occurs before or after a single taste-LiCl pairing. Following sucrose-LiCl pairings in Experiment 3A, LiCl-alone exposures retroactively interfered with the retention of the prior aversion to sucrose, with the level of post-US interference becoming an increasing function of the number of US-alone experiences. In Experiment 3B, the association of sucrose with LiCl did not interfere with the development of an almond aversion, whereas LiCl-alone exposures following the acquisition of a sucrose aversion proactively interfered with the development of a second taste aversion (almond). It is suggested that a physiological explanation will not adequately account for the present results of these experiments. The results are discussed within the framework of alternative associative models.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.