No abstract

OBJECTIVE To design a new risk assessment tool to identify patients at high risk for hospital-acquired pressure injuries. METHODS The researchers developed the Shieh Score using retrospective data of 406,032 hospital admissions from January 2014 to December 2016 with 1,299 pressure injury cases from the pressure injury registry. A decision tree and best subset logistic regression were used to select predictors from demographic and clinical candidate variables, which were then used to construct the Shieh Score. RESULTS The final Shieh Score included the following measures: sex, age, diabetes, glomerular filtration rate, albumin level, level of function, use of IV norepinephrine, mechanical ventilation, and level of consciousness. The Shieh Score had a higher Youden Index, specificity, and positive predictive value than the Braden Scale. However, the Braden Scale had a higher sensitivity compared with the Shieh Score. CONCLUSIONS The Shieh Score is an alternative risk assessment tool that may effectively identify a smaller number of patients at high risk for hospital-acquired pressure injuries with a higher specificity and positive predictive value than the Braden Scale.

No abstract

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 rapidly shifted health care toward telehealth. We assessed satisfaction with and preferences for telehealth among patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in an integrated healthcare system in Southern California with members aged 18–90 years with an International Classification of Diseases 9 and 10 codes for IBS from office-based encounters between June 1, 2018, and June 1, 2020. Eligible patients were emailed a survey assessing telehealth satisfaction overall and by patient-related factors, IBS characteristics, health and technologic literacy, utilization, and coronavirus disease 2019 perceptions. We identified perceived telehealth benefits and challenges. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of telehealth dissatisfaction. RESULTS: Of 44,789 surveys sent, 5,832 (13.0%) patients responded and 1,632 (3.6%) had Rome IV IBS. Among 1,314 (22.5%) patients with IBS and prior telehealth use (mean age 52.6 years [17.4]; 84.9% female; and 59.4% non-Hispanic White, 29.0% Hispanic, and 5.6% non-Hispanic Black), 898 (68.3%) were satisfied, 130 (9.9%) were dissatisfied, and 286 (21.8%) felt neutral. In addition, 78.6% would use telehealth again. Independent predictors of telehealth dissatisfaction include social media use of once a week or less (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.1; 1.3–3.5), duration of IBS for <1 year (adjusted OR = 8.2; 1.9–35.8), and willingness to travel 60 plus minutes for face-to-face visits (adjusted OR = 2.6; 1.4–3.7). Patients' main concern with telehealth was a lack of physical examination. DISCUSSION: Most of the patients with IBS are satisfied with telehealth. Shorter duration of IBS diagnosis, comfort with technology, and increased willingness to travel were associated with telehealth dissatisfaction. These predictors may help identify a target population for a focused IBS-telehealth program.