No abstract

Objective To synthesize the nature and extent of research on rehabilitation care provision to COVID‐19 (COVID) patients. Specifically, we aimed to: (1) Describe the impact of COVID on patients and associated rehabilitation needs; (2) Outline the adaptations and preparations required to enable the provision of COVID rehabilitation; (3) Describe the types of rehabilitation services and treatments provided to COVID patients; and (4) Identify barriers and facilitators to delivering COVID rehabilitation. Literature Survey We searched Medline, PsychINFO, Embase, and CINAHL on June 26 th , 2020 using key words such as “rehabilitation”, “physical medicine”, “allied health professionals” and variations of “COVID”. The search was updated on October 13 th , 2020. We included articles published in English and that focused on some aspect of COVID rehabilitation for adults. We excluded articles focused on pediatric populations and those not focused (or minimally focused) on rehabilitation for COVID patients. Methodology Data were charted based on article type (i.e. primary data, secondary data, guidelines). Key information extracted included: (i) COVID sequelae; (ii) rehabilitation adaptations; (iii) structure, function and content of rehabilitation services/programs; (iv) facilitators and/or barriers to providing COVID rehabilitation; and (v) recommendations for COVID rehabilitation programming. Data were synthesized narratively. Synthesis In total, 129 articles were included in the review that reported primary data (n=33), secondary data (n=82), and clinical practice/patient self‐management guidelines (n=13). Evidence begins to suggest that rehabilitation is necessary and valuable for addressing COVID‐related declines in health, function, and well‐being. Most articles recommended that an individualized rehabilitation program be provided across the continuum of care by an interdisciplinary team of professionals and that the nature and extent of rehabilitation be informed by the care setting and COVID severity. Most issues that challenged COVID rehabilitation delivery were directly addressed by the facilitators and adaptations identified. Conclusions Future recommendations include a greater emphasis on the psychosocial aspects of COVID rehabilitation, inclusion of families in rehabilitation planning, and the use of qualitative approaches to complement clinical data. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background:Digital residual limb shape capture (three-dimensional [3D] scanning), computer-assisted design (CAD), and computer-assisted manufacturing with 3D printing technology show promise for a completely digital process of fabricating prosthetic sockets for patients with limb loss. The effectiveness and quality of digitally designed 3D-printed lower extremity prosthetic sockets is understudied, and there is lack of data on the patient and prosthetist experiences with this digital workflow.Objective:To obtain stakeholder feedback on the feasibility and acceptability of using a completely digital prosthetic fabrication process consisting of 3D scanning, CAD, and 3D printing in a rehabilitation setting for adults with transtibial limb amputations.Study design:Qualitative design.Methods:Study participants with a transtibial-level amputation were fit with a prosthetic socket fabricated using digital shape capture with a 3D scanner, CAD, and 3D printing in addition to a traditionally handcasted manually fabricated socket. Participants tried on and evaluated both sockets. Semistructured interviews took place after the fitting appointments. A focus group was conducted with prosthetists to obtain their feedback. Audio data were transcribed verbatim, and an inductive content analysis was undertaken.Results:Eleven patient participants and 3 prosthetists identified 4 main themes: 1) openness and enthusiasm for digital prosthetic fabrication; 2) relative advantages of digital fabrication vs. traditional socket fabrication; 3) readiness of the technology used for adoption in practice; and 4) digital prosthetic workflow and 3D printing implementation considerations.Conclusions:Patients and prosthetists were enthusiastic about digital prosthetic socket fabrication and saw potential advantages over traditional methods. Both patients and prosthetists had concerns about the durability, safety, and aesthetics of the 3D printed sockets in this study. Further studies are needed to optimize digital prosthetic fabrication with 3D printing in prosthetic practice.

Adult-acquired burn injuries are a life-altering event that can lead to debilitating functional or psychological impairments. With advancements in health care resulting in decreased mortality rates, survivors of burn injuries can expect to live longer. This warrants a shift in focus to better understand what happens to adults once they are discharged from the hospital into the community. Therefore, the purpose of this scoping review was to map the literature regarding the long-term outcomes of community-dwelling adult-acquired burn survivors. A computer-assisted literature search was conducted on literature from January 1, 2000 to August 31, 2018 utilizing four large databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL, and PsycINFO). Articles were included if they had a minimum of five individuals with a burn injury as a result of an accidental injury who were at least 18 years of age at the time of injury. Fifty-four articles were found suitable for inclusion in this review. The majority of studies were conducted in the United States and were longitudinal in design. Four themes were apparent from the articles: postburn complications, psychosocial outcomes, quality of life, and community participation. Data are lacking with respect to outcomes more than 5 years postburn as well as qualitative research. Furthermore, more literature is needed to understand the impact of postburn complications, coping strategies, and posttraumatic growth as well as barriers to community participation. Overall, there is an emerging body of literature that describes the long-term outcomes of adult-acquired burn survivors up to 5 years postburn.