The localization of NQO1 near acetylated microtubules has led to the hypothesis that NQO1 may work in concert with the NAD + -dependent deacetylase SIRT2 to regulate acetyl α-tubulin (K 40 ) levels on microtubules. NQO1 catalyzes the oxidation of NADH to NAD + and may supplement levels of NAD + near microtubules to aid SIRT2 deacetylase activity. While HDAC6 has been shown to regulate the majority of microtubule acetylation at K 40 , SIRT2 is also known to modulate microtubule acetylation (K 40 ) in the perinuclear region. In this study we examined the potential roles NQO1 may play in modulating acetyl α-tubulin levels. Knock-out or knock-down of NQO1 or SIRT2 did not change the levels of acetyl α-tubulin in 16HBE human bronchial epithelial cells and 3T3-L1 fibroblasts; however, treatment with a mechanism-based inhibitor of NQO1 (MI2321) led to a short-lived temporal increase in acetyl α-tubulin levels in both cell lines without impacting the intracellular pools of NADH or NAD + . Inactivation of NQO1 by MI2321 resulted in lower levels of NQO1 immunostaining on microtubules, consistent with redox-dependent changes in NQO1 conformation as evidenced by the use of redox-specific, anti-NQO1 antibodies in immunoprecipitation studies. Given the highly dynamic nature of acetylation-deacetylation reactions at α-tubulin K 40 and the crowded protein environment surrounding this site, disruption in the binding of NQO1 to microtubules may temporally disturb the physical interactions of enzymes responsible for maintaining the microtubule acetylome.

No abstract

The mouse retina comprises seven major cell types that exist in differing proportions. They are generated from multipotent progenitors in a stochastic manner, such that the relative frequency of any given type generated changes over time. The mechanisms determining the proportions of each cell type are only partially understood. Photoreceptors and bipolar interneurons are derived from cells that express Otx2. Within this population, Blimp1 (Prdm1) helps set the balance between photoreceptors and bipolar cells by suppressing bipolar identity in most of the cells. How only a subset of these Otx2+ cells decides to upregulate Blimp1 and adopt photoreceptor fate is unknown. To understand this, we investigated how Blimp1 transcription is regulated. We identified several potential Blimp1 retinal enhancer elements using DNase hypersensitivity sequencing. Only one of the elements recapitulated Blimp1 spatial and temporal expression in cultured explant assays and within the retinas of transgenic mice. Mutagenesis of this retinal Blimp1 enhancer element revealed four discrete sequences that were each required for its activity. These included highly conserved Otx2 and ROR (retinoic acid receptor related orphan receptor) binding sites. The other required sequences do not appear to be controlled by Otx2 or ROR factors, increasing the complexity of the Blimp1 gene regulatory network. Our results show that the intersection of three or more transcription factors is required to correctly regulate the spatial and temporal features of Blimp1 enhancer expression. This explains how Blimp1 expression can diverge from Otx2 and set the balance between photoreceptor and bipolar fates.

No abstract