The AM-PAC IMSF and JH-HLM had excellent interrater reliability and test-retest reliability for both physical therapists and nurses. The evaluation of convergent validity suggested that AM-PAC IMSF and JH-HLM measured constructs of patient mobility and physical functioning.
Background:
A decline in physical functioning is common during an intensive care unit (ICU) stay. The Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit (FSS-ICU) is a performance-based measure designed to evaluate aspects of physical functioning in the ICU setting. While existing data support validity of the FSS-ICU, further investigation is needed regarding its interrater reliability.
Objective:
Evaluate interrater reliability of the FSS-ICU when completed by physical therapists (PTs), as part of routine clinical practice, across a wide range of patients with critical illness.
Design:
Prospective observational evaluation.
Methods:
Across patients in surgical, medical, and neurological ICUs, 8 PTs with 6 months of experience or more using the FSS-ICU (median [range] years of ICU experience = 2 [1-3]) administered the FSS-ICU. One of 2 reference rater PTs observed the FSS-ICU evaluation, and simultaneously scored it, with a minimum of 10 assessments per clinical PT. Reference rater and clinical PTs were blinded to each other's scores. Bland-Altman plots were constructed and intraclass correlation coefficients were computed using a random intercept (PT session and rater) model.
Results:
Eighty-one assessments on 76 different patients were observed by a reference rater PT. Bland-Altman plots revealed a mean difference in FSS-ICU scoring of 0.0 (95% limits of agreement: −4.0 to +4.0), with an intraclass correlation coefficient (95% confidence interval) of 0.985 (0.981-0.987). The intraclass correlation coefficients for patients in surgical, medical, and neurological ICUs were very similar: 0.984 (0.973-0.988), 0.987 (0.979-0.990), and 0.977 (0.963-0.983), respectively.
Limitations:
Single-center evaluation.
Conclusions:
The FSS-ICU evaluations, performed by PTs as part of routine clinical care across a variety of patients with critical illness, have excellent reliability compared with reference rater PTs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.