In higher eukaryotes, pre-rRNA processing occurs almost exclusively post-transcriptionally. This is not the case in rapidly dividing yeast, as the majority of nascent pre-rRNAs are processed cotranscriptionally, with cleavage at the A 2 site first releasing a pre-40S ribosomal subunit followed by release of a pre-60S ribosomal subunit upon transcription termination. Ribosome assembly is driven in part by hierarchical association of assembly factors and r-proteins. Groups of proteins are thought to associate with pre-ribosomes cotranscriptionally during early assembly steps, whereas others associate later, after transcription is completed. Here we describe a previously uncharacterized phenotype observed upon disruption of ribosome assembly, in which normally late-binding proteins associate earlier, with pre-ribosomes containing 35S pre-rRNA. As previously observed by many other groups, we show that disruption of 60S subunit biogenesis results in increased amounts of 35S pre-rRNA, suggesting that a greater fraction of pre-rRNAs are processed post-transcriptionally. Surprisingly, we found that early preribosomes containing 35S pre-rRNA also contain proteins previously thought to only associate with pre-ribosomes after early pre-rRNA processing steps have separated maturation of the two subunits. We believe the shift to post-transcriptional processing is ultimately due to decreased cellular division upon disruption of ribosome assembly. When cells are grown under stress or to high density, a greater fraction of pre-rRNAs are processed post-transcriptionally and follow an alternative processing pathway. Together, these results affirm the principle that ribosome assembly occurs through different, parallel assembly pathways and suggest that there is a kinetic foot-race between the formation of protein binding sites and pre-rRNA processing events.

Ribosome biogenesis involves numerous preribosomal RNA (pre-rRNA) processing events to remove internal and external transcribed spacer sequences, ultimately yielding three mature rRNAs. Removal of the internal transcribed spacer 2 spacer RNA is the final step in large subunit pre-rRNA processing and begins with endonucleolytic cleavage at the C site of 27SB pre-rRNA. C cleavage requires the hierarchical recruitment of 11 ribosomal proteins and 14 ribosome assembly factors. However, the function of these proteins in C cleavage remained unclear. In this study, we have performed a detailed analysis of the effects of depleting proteins required for C cleavage and interpreted these results using cryo-electron microscopy structures of assembling 60S subunits. This work revealed that these proteins are required for remodeling of several neighborhoods, including two major functional centers of the 60S subunit, suggesting that these remodeling events form a checkpoint leading to C cleavage. Interestingly, when C cleavage is directly blocked by depleting or inactivating the C endonuclease, assembly progresses through all other subsequent steps.

A major gap in our understanding of ribosome assembly is knowing the precise function of each of the ∼200 assembly factors. The steps in subunit assembly in which these factors participate have been examined for the most part by depleting each protein from cells. Depletion of the assembly factor Erb1 prevents stable assembly of seven other interdependent assembly factors with pre-60S subunits, resulting in turnover of early preribosomes, before the ITS1 spacer can be removed from 27SA3 pre-rRNA. To investigate more specific functions of Erb1, we constructed eight internal deletions of 40–60 amino acid residues each, spanning the amino-terminal half of Erb1. The erb1Δ161–200 and erb1Δ201–245 deletion mutations block a later step than depletion of Erb1, namely cleavage of the C2 site that initiates removal of the ITS2 spacer. Two other remodeling events fail to occur in these erb1 mutants: association of twelve different assembly factors with domain V of 25S rRNA, including the neighborhood surrounding the peptidyl transferase center, and stable association of ribosomal proteins with rRNA surrounding the polypeptide exit tunnel. This suggests that successful initiation of construction of these functional centers is a checkpoint for committing to spacer removal.

Ribosomes are responsible for translating the genome, in the form of mRNA, into the proteome in all organisms. Biogenesis of ribosomes in eukaryotes is a complex process involving numerous remodeling events driven in part by the concerted actions of hundreds of protein assembly factors. A major challenge in studying eukaryotic ribosome assembly has, until recently, been a lack of structural data to facilitate understanding of the conformational and compositional changes the pre-ribosome undergoes during its construction. Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has begun filling these gaps; recent advances in cryo-EM have enabled the determination of several high resolution pre-ribosome structures. This review focuses mainly on lessons learned from the study of pre-60S particles purified from yeast using the assembly factor Nog2 as bait. These Nog2 particles provide insight into many aspects of nuclear stages of 60S subunit assembly, including construction of major 60S subunit functional centers and processing of the ITS2 spacer RNA.

Successful proteome analysis requires reliable sample preparation beginning with protein solubilization and ending with a sample free of contaminants, ready for downstream analysis. Most proteome sample preparation technologies utilize precipitation or filter-based separation, both of which have significant disadvantages. None of the current technologies are able to prepare both intact proteins or digested peptides. Here, we introduce a reversible protein tag, ProMTag, that enables whole proteome capture, cleanup, and release of intact proteins for top-down analysis. Alternatively, the addition of a novel Trypsin derivative to the workflow generates peptides for bottom-up analysis. We show that the ProMTag workflow yields >90% for intact proteins and >85% for proteome digests. For top-down analysis, ProMTag cleanup improves resolution on 2D gels; for bottom-up exploration, this methodology produced reproducible mass spectrometry results, demonstrating that the ProMTag method is a truly universal approach that produces high-quality proteome samples compatible with multiple downstream analytical techniques. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD027799.

Sample preparation is a crucial first step for both genomics and proteomics workflows. Removal of contaminants such as salts, detergents, and other biologics while maintaining high yields of the desired product is key to reproducible and informative results from these analyses. More and more frequently, these ‐omics technologies are being used in tandem to gain deeper insights into biological processes. However, multi‐omics sample preparation remains tedious and usually requires many steps in multiple different sample preparation workflows. In this study, we present a new multi‐omics workflow for the simultaneous preparation of DNA and protein samples from a single starting cell lysate. We accomplished this using the ProMTag reversible click chemistry technology that allows for reversible modification of the surface of proteins. Using ProMTag we were able to tag proteins in a cell lysate, bind them to ProMTag capture resin, and then precipitate nucleic acids so they also stay with the resin. With the nucleic acids and proteins bound to the resin, we were then able to wash away detergents, salts, and other contaminants. We then eluted the nucleic acids by resolubilizing in a nucleic acid elution buffer. We then were able to reverse the ProMTag by adding the protein elution buffer and eluted the sample in a mass spectrometry (MS) compatible buffer ready for proteomic analysis. Using this workflow we got yields >75% for protein and >90% for DNA. Gel electrophoresis showed a genomic DNA band free of degradation and the 260/280 absorption ratio indicated a pure DNA sample. Whole genome sequencing and MS proteomics analysis were performed and compared to traditional separate sample preparation workflows for DNA and proteins. This work establishes a new, high yield, reproducible workflow for the simultaneous preparation of DNA and proteins for genomics and proteomic analysis from a single starting sample.

No abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are complex, cell‐derived nanoparticles generated by all cell types. EVs are composed of lipid bilayer membranes and their associated membrane proteins, nucleic acids, and luminal proteins. The mechanism by which Gram‐positive bacteria shed EVs is still unknown. EVs from the Gram‐positive human pathogen S. pneumoniae, which is a major cause of otitis medi and pneumonia, are of particular interest because of how they EVs modulate the host immune response. To uncover possible mechanisms for EV production and shedding in S. pneumoniae, we have performed a comparative proteomics analysis of EV membrane proteins versus whole‐cell membrane proteins. Membrane proteins were enriched from intact S. pneumoniae cells or their EVs using a ProMTag labeling and capture workflow. ProMTag is a bifunctional protein tag where one moiety of the tag is able to form a reversible, covalent link to primary amines on proteins. The other moiety is methyltetrazine, which can form an irreversible, covalent bond with trans‐Cyclooctene (TCO) on the surface of beads to capture ProMTagged proteins for cleanup and elution. Using this workflow plasma membrane proteins can be tagged, captured, washed to remove non‐plasma membrane proteins, and then eluted in their original, unmodified state. In this study, intact cells and EVs from S. pneumoniae cultures were separated and the extracellular domains of membrane proteins in these two fractions were labeled with ProMTag. The membrane proteins were then enriched, washed, and eluted using the ProMTag workflow. These membrane protein populations were then TMT labeled and analyzed using mass spectrometry. Comparative analysis revealed membrane proteins that are concentrated or absent in EV membranes relative to bulk plasma membrane from whole cells, indicating a selective process for EV formation in S. pneumoniae. With this information, we present a new model for EV formation and shedding in S. pneumoniae.