SummaryGeminin is an essential cell-cycle protein that is only present from S phase to early mitosis in metazoan somatic cells [1, 2]. Genetic ablation of geminin in the mouse results in preimplantation embryonic lethality because pluripotent cells fail to form and all cells differentiate to trophoblast [3, 4]. Here we show that geminin is present in G1 phase of mouse pluripotent cells in contrast to somatic cells, where anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C)-mediated proteasomal destruction removes geminin in G1 [1, 2, 5]. Silencing geminin directly or by depleting the APC/C inhibitor Emi1 causes loss of stem cell identity and trophoblast differentiation of mouse embryonal carcinoma and embryonic stem cells. Depletion of cyclins A2 or B1 does not induce this effect, even though both of these APC/C substrates are also present during G1 of pluripotent cells. Crucially, geminin antagonizes the chromatin-remodeling protein Brg1 to maintain expression of Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog. Our results define a pluripotency pathway by which suppressed APC/C activity protects geminin from degradation in G1, allowing sustained expression of core pluripotency factors. Collectively, these findings link the cell cycle to the pluripotent state but also raise an unexplained paradox: How is cell-cycle progression possible in pluripotent cells when oscillations of key regulatory proteins are lost?

No abstract

The tumour suppressor p53 has been shown to be modified at its C-terminus with ubiquitin and the ubiquitin-like proteins SUMO and NEDD8. Whereas monoubiquitination of p53 is strongly associated with nuclear export, the effects of sumoylation and neddylation remain unclear. In this study we have generated p53-Ub, p53-SUMO-1 and p53-NEDD8 fusion proteins as models for the effect of these modifications on the localization and function of p53. As shown before, the ubiquitin fusion clearly drives nuclear export of p53 and we now find that this is also partially the case for a SUMO-1 fusion, which does not localise to PML bodies. In contrast a NEDD8 fusion has little effect on nuclear export, and mutating NEDD8 to more closely resemble ubiquitin did not restore nuclear export. Despite their differing subcellular localization, we find that both p53-ubiquitin and p53-NEDD8 retain similar transcriptional activity and both induce apoptosis at a similar level to unfused p53. The p53-ubiquitin fusion protein is potentially a good model for studying the role of p53 outside the nucleus. However, in our experiments we find that the export of p53 from the nucleus is not sufficient to activate its cytoplasmic apoptotic function which may depend on the ability to deubiquitinate cytoplasmic p53.