No abstract

The activities of ampicillin, meropenem, azithromycin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and moxifloxacin against intracellular hemolysin-positive Listeria monocytogenes were measured in human THP-1 macrophages and were compared with the extracellular activities observed in broth. All extracellular concentrations were adjusted to explore ranges that are clinically achievable in human serum upon conventional therapy. In broth, ampicillin, meropenem, and azithromycin were only bacteriostatic, whereas gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and moxifloxacin were strongly bactericidal in a concentration-dependent manner. In cells, ampicillin, meropenem, azithromycin, and ciprofloxacin were slightly bactericidal (0.3-to 0.8-log CFU reductions), moxifloxacin was strongly bactericidal (2.1-log CFU reduction), and gentamicin was virtually inactive.

Antibiotic efflux pumps expressed in eukaryotic cells can decrease the intracellular accumulation of the corresponding drugs and therefore impair their activity against intracellular bacteria. We have investigated whether verapamil (an inhibitor of P-glycoprotein) and gemfibrozil (an inhibitor of multidrug resistance proteins (MRP) and other organic anion transporters), can modulate the intracellular activity of azithromycin and ciprofloxacin against Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus in J774 macrophages. In parallel, we have measured the cell accumulation and subcellular distribution of both drugs. Antibiotics were used at equipotent extracellular concentrations (from 0.5 x to 10 x MIC) to allow for pharmacological comparisons. Azithromycin was bacteriostatic against L. monocytogenes and slightly bactericidal against S. aureus. Verapamil did not improve the maximal activity of azithromycin but allowed it to reach a similar effect at extracellular concentrations about seven-fold lower in both models. Azithromycin was predominantly localized in cell granules (66%), the remainder being in the cytosol and in the 'nuclei/unbroken cells' fraction. Verapamil increased the cellular accumulation of azithromycin by almost 2.4-fold without modifying its subcellular distribution. Ciprofloxacin displayed a strong concentration-dependent bactericidal activity in both models. Gemfibrozil increased ciprofloxacin activity almost 2.5-fold against L. monocytogenes, but not against S. aureus. Ciprofloxacin was predominantly (65%) distributed in the cytosol. Gemfibrozil increased ciprofloxacin total accumulation by approximately 2.4-fold, but the excess was only found in the cytosol. Inhibition of efflux pumps may be a useful strategy to improve antibiotic efficacy against intracellular bacteria when increased accumulation can be obtained in the compartment where bacteria sojourn.

The intracellular pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oritavancin (LY333328) were studied in cultured cells. Oritavancin was avidly accumulated by J774 and THP-1 macrophages and rat fibroblasts and to a lesser extent by LLC-PK1 and Caco-2 cells. In J774 macrophages, the level of accumulation reached a plateau (at 370-fold the extracellular concentration) within 24 h and was partly defeated by a rise in serum protein levels. Efflux was incomplete (with a plateau at two-thirds of the original level at 6 h). In short-term kinetic studies, oritavancin uptake was linear for up to 4 h (as was the case for horseradish peroxidase and small latex beads, used as markers of the fluid phase and adsorptive endocytosis, respectively), which was in contrast to azithromycin and chloroquine uptake (which accumulate in cells by diffusion and segregation). The rates of clearance of oritavancin and latex beads were comparable (150 and 120 l ؋ mg of protein ؊1 ؋ h ؊1 , respectively) and were approximately 200 times higher than that of horseradish peroxidase. Oritavancin accumulation was partially reduced by monensin but was unaffected by acidic pH (these conditions abolished chloroquine accumulation). Cell-associated oritavancin was found in lysosomal fractions after homogenization of J774 macrophages and fractionation by isopycnic centrifugation. Oritavancin was bactericidal against intracellular Staphylococcus aureus (phagolysosomal infection) but was unable to control the intracellular growth of Listeria monocytogenes (cytosolic infection), even though its cellular concentration largely exceeded the MIC (0.02 mg/liter) and minimal bactericidal concentration (2 mg/liter). We conclude that oritavancin enters cells by adsorptive endocytosis (favored by its lipophilic side chain and/or the presence of three protonatable amines), which drives it to lysosomes, where it exerts antibiotic activity.

Routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) reports only total vancomycin ( VAN) concentrations, although protein binding varies and it is generally accepted that only free VAN is active. The aims of this study were to examine the correlation between free and total VAN concentrations in order to estimate whether free VAN levels can be predicted based on its total concentration.