Tanystropheus represents one of the most characteristic genera of Triassic reptiles and is typified by easily recognizable, hyperelongate cervical vertebrae. First described in 1852, isolated cervical vertebrae and other remains have been referred to the genus and various species have been erected and rejected based on this material. This has resulted in a complicated and convoluted taxonomic history of the genus and confusion as to the validity of species and the referral of specimens. With the exception of the well-represented T. longobardicus, the five other species of Tanystropheus are known from isolated elements or a single, partial specimen. Here, we provide a complete overview of the taxonomic history and a revision of the genus based on first hand observations of the type material of most of the species. From this, we conclude that T. conspicuus and T. haasi should be considered nomina dubia and that T. meridensis constitutes a junior synonym to T. longobardicus. Furthermore, T. longobardicus can be subdivided into two discrete morphotypes that might represent separate species. However, a more detailed study is required to test this hypothesis. Finally, T. fossai is considered distinctly different from the other Tanystropheus taxa and is therefore referred to a separate genus, Sclerostropheus.

No abstract

the genus Macrocnemus is a member of the Tanystropheidae, a clade of non-archosauriform archosauromorphs well known for their very characteristic, elongated cervical vertebrae. Articulated specimens are known from the Middle Triassic of Alpine Europe and China. Although multiple articulated specimens are known, description of the cranial morphology has proven challenging due to the crushed preservation of the specimens. Here we use synchrotron micro computed tomography to analyse the cranial morphology of a specimen of the type species Macrocnemus bassanii from the Besano Formation of Monte San Giorgio, Ticino, Switzerland. The skull is virtually complete and we identify and describe the braincase and palatal elements as well the atlas-axis complex for the first time. Moreover, we add to the knowledge of the morphology of the skull roof, rostrum and hemimandible, and reconstruct the cranium of M. bassanii in 3D using the rendered models of the elements. The circumorbital bones were found to be similar in morphology to those of the archosauromorphs Prolacerta broomi and Protorosaurus speneri. In addition, we confirm the palatine, vomer and pterygoid to be tooth-bearing palatal bones, but also observed heterodonty on the pterygoid and the palatine. The genus Macrocnemus was described in the early twentieth century by Baron von Nopcsa based on a fragmentary specimen from Monte San Giorgio 1,2. After subsequent expeditions to the Besano Formation, which crops out in the Monte San Giorgio area, resulted in the discovery of additional specimens, the taxon was more properly described 3. Unfortunately, the holotype, stored in Milan, has since been lost as it was destroyed during the Second World War 4. The phylogenetic affinities of Macrocnemus were initially unclear. Early researchers observed similarities in the shape of the cervical vertebrae with contemporaneous taxa and erected the taxon Protorosauria 5,6. Notable members of this formerly recognised 'superorder' were Tanystropheus, Protorosaurus, Macrocnemus and Prolacerta, and all these taxa have elongated cervical vertebrae. The elongation of the cervical vertebrae is expressed most extremely in the genus Tanystropheus, of which the neck is three times the length of its trunk 7. Researchers were unsure whether to place the clade closer to the Lepidosauria or to the Archosauromorpha (e.g. 7,8). Currently, the members of the Protorosauria are all considered non-archosauriform archosauromorphs (e.g. 9-11). However, the clade itself has been observed to be paraphyletic or even polyphyletic in recent phylogenetic analyses 9 and references therein. Nonetheless, the recent analyses noted above have all recovered a monophyletic Tanystropheidae at the base of Archosauromorpha that includes Macrocnemus as well as Tanystropheus, Amotosaurus, Langobardisaurus, and Tanytrachelos, with Jesairosaurus often recovered as sister taxon to the clade.

Crocodylomorpha is the stem-lineage of modern crocodylians and the only pseudosuchian (i.e. crocodylian-line archosaurs) clade that survived the Triassic–Jurassic mass extinction event. Its earliest members, the non-crocodyliform crocodylomorphs, also known as ‘sphenosuchians’, were terrestrial and mostly small-bodied (<2 m long), although some large-bodied forms are known. Saltoposuchus connectens is one of the first described crocodylomorph species but it remains poorly studied, in part due to its contentious taxonomy. Here, all referred Saltoposuchus specimens are described in detail for the first time and its taxonomy is revised, with additional taxonomic implications for the British crocodylomorph Terrestrisuchus gracilis and the coelophysoid theropod Procompsognathus triassicus. Saltoposuchus connectens is clearly distinguished from Terrestrisuchus gracilis based on both cranial and postcranial features. The phylogenetic analysis finds that Saltoposuchus connectens, Terrestrisuchus gracilis, and Litargosuchus leptorhynchus form a clade of gracile, long-legged crocodylomorphs, identified as Saltoposuchidae Crush 1984. A histological section of a femur reveals highly vascularized fibrolamellar tissue in the second-largest specimen of Saltoposuchus connectens (SMNS 12596), indicating sustained high growth rates. A similar pattern was previously observed in Terrestrisuchus sp., contrasting with slower growth rates in the crocodylomorph Hesperosuchus agilis. These findings suggest that saltoposuchids had a high resting metabolic rate and active lifestyle.

The historical clade “Protorosauria” represents an important group of archosauromorph reptiles that had a wide geographic distribution between the Late Permian and Late Triassic. “Protorosaurs” are characterized by their long necks, which are epitomized in the genus Tanystropheus and in Dinocephalosaurus orientalis. Recent phylogenetic analyses have indicated that “Protorosauria” is a polyphyletic clade, but the exact relationships of the various “protorosaur” taxa within the archosauromorph lineage is currently uncertain. Several taxa, although represented by relatively complete material, have previously not been assessed phylogenetically. We present a new phylogenetic hypothesis that comprises a wide range of archosauromorphs, including the most exhaustive sample of “protorosaurs” to date and several “protorosaur” taxa from the eastern Tethys margin that have not been included in any previous analysis. The polyphyly of “Protorosauria” is confirmed and therefore we suggest the usage of this term should be abandoned. Tanystropheidae is recovered as a monophyletic group and the Chinese taxa Dinocephalosaurus orientalis and Pectodens zhenyuensis form a new archosauromorph clade, Dinocephalosauridae, which is closely related to Tanystropheidae. The well-known crocopod and former “protorosaur” Prolacerta broomi is considerably less closely related to Archosauriformes than was previously considered.

Prolacerta broomi is an Early Triassic archosauromorph of particular importance to the early evolution of archosaurs. It is well known from many specimens from South Africa and a few relatively small specimens from Antarctica. Here, a new articulated specimen from the Fremouw Formation of Antarctica is described in detail. It represents the largest specimen of Prolacerta described to date with a nearly fully articulated and complete postcranium in addition to four skull elements. The study of this specimen and the re-evaluation of other Prolacerta specimens from both Antarctica and South Africa reveal several important new insights into its morphology, most notably regarding the premaxilla, manus, and pelvic girdle. Although well-preserved skull material from Antarctica is still lacking for Prolacerta, a detailed comparison of Prolacerta specimens from Antarctica and South Africa corroborates previous findings that there are no characters clearly distinguishing the specimens from these different regions and therefore the Antarctic material is assigned to Prolacerta broomi. The biogeographical implications of these new findings are discussed. Finally, some osteological characters for Prolacerta are revised and an updated diagnosis and phylogenetic analysis are provided.

Correctly identifying taxa at the root of major clades or the oldest clade-representatives is critical for meaningful interpretations of evolution. A small, partially crushed skull from the Late Triassic (Norian) of Connecticut, USA, originally described as an indeterminate rhynchocephalian saurian, was recently named Colobops noviportensis and reinterpreted as sister to all remaining Rhynchosauria, one of the earliest and globally distributed groups of herbivorous reptiles. It was also interpreted as having an exceptionally reinforced snout and powerful bite based on an especially large supratemporal fenestra. Here, after a re-analysis of the original scan data, we show that the skull was strongly dorsoventrally compressed post-mortem, with most bones out of life position. The cranial anatomy is consistent with that of other rhynchocephalian lepidosauromorphs, not rhynchosaurs. The ‘reinforced snout' region and the ‘exceptionally enlarged temporal region’ are preservational artefacts and not exceptional among clevosaurid rhynchocephalians. Colobops is thus not a key taxon for understanding diapsid feeding apparatus evolution.

The postcranial morphology of the extremely long-necked Tanystropheus hydroides is well-known, but observations of skull morphology were previously limited due to compression of the known specimens. Here we provide a detailed description of the skull of PIMUZ T 2790, including a partial endocast and endosseous labyrinth, based on synchrotron microtomographic data, and compare its morphology to that of other early Archosauromorpha. In many features, such as the wide and flattened snout and the configuration of the temporal and palatal regions, Tanystropheus hydroides differs strongly from other early archosauromorphs. The braincase possesses a combination of derived archosaur traits, such as the presence of a laterosphenoid and the ossification of the lateral wall of the braincase, but also differs from archosauriforms in the morphology of the ventral ramus of the opisthotic, the horizontal orientation of the parabasisphenoid, and the absence of a clearly defined crista prootica. Tanystropheus hydroides was a ram-feeder that likely caught its prey through a laterally directed snapping bite. Although the cranial morphology of other archosauromorph lineages is relatively well-represented, the skulls of most tanystropheid taxa remain poorly understood due to compressed and often fragmentary specimens. The recent descriptions of the skulls of Macrocnemus bassanii and now Tanystropheus hydroides reveal a large cranial disparity in the clade, reflecting wide ecological diversity, and highlighting the importance of non-archosauriform Archosauromorpha to both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems during the Triassic.